Skip to main content

Connectionism Versus Symbolism in High-Level Cognition

  • Chapter
Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind

Part of the book series: Studies in Cognitive Systems ((COGS,volume 9))

Abstract

Symbolic processing rests on a computational technology that includes dynamic memory management, virtual pointers to created structured objects, and the use of variables to propagate bindings. Connectionist models have lacked these features, but create distributed representations that are “rich,” i.e., that encode numerous statistically based expectations, acquired from experience. It is argued here that a synthesis of both symbolic and connectionist features will make important contributions to our understanding of high-level cognition. In what follows, a motivation is given for the need of such a synthesis, along with several, novel techniques used in connectionist systems designed to perform high-level, language-related processing tasks.

The research reported here was supported in part by grants from the JTF Program of the DoD (monitored by JPL), the ITA Foundation, the Office of Naval Research, the W. M. Keck Foundation and the Hughes Artificial Intelligence Center. Hardware grants in support of this research were supplied by Apollo Computer, Hewlett-Packard, the W. M. Keck Foundation and the National Science Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajjanagadde, V. and Shastri, L.: 1989, ‘Efficient Inference with Multi-Place Predicates and Variables in a Connectionist System’, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado, S. J., Dyer, M. G. and Flowers, M.: 1990, ‘Natural Language Processing: Computer Comprehension of Editorial Text’, in H. Adeli (ed.), Knowledge Engineering: Volume 1, Fundamentals, (pp. 286–344), McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., Black, J.B. and Turner, T.J.: 1979, ‘Scripts in Memory for Text’, Cognitive Psychology 11, 177–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charniak, E.: 1986, ‘A Neat Theory of Marker Passing’, Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 584–588), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S.: 1986, Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of Mind-Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S. and Sejnowski, T. J.: 1989, ‘Neural Representation and Neural Computation’, in L. Nadel, L. A. Cooper, P. Culicover and R. M. Harnish (eds.), Neural Connections, Mental Computation, Bradford Book, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullingford, R. E.: 1981, ‘SAM’, in R. C. Schank and C. K. Reisbeck (eds.), Inside Computer Understanding: Five Programs Plus Miniatures, (pp. 75–119), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C. and Dyer, M. G.: 1986, ‘Encoding Planning Knowledge for Recognition, Construction, and Learning’, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci-86), Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C. and Dyer, M.G.: 1987, ‘Symbolic Schemata, Role Binding and the Evolution of Structure in Connectionist Memories’, Proceedings of the IEEE First Annual International Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C. P. and Dyer, M. G.: 1989, ‘Parallel Retrieval and Application of Conceptual Knowledge’, in Touretzky, Hinton and Sejnowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 1988 Connectionist Models Summerschool, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C. P.: 1989, Tensor Manipulation Networks: Connectionist and Symbolic Approaches to Comprehension, Learning, and Planning, Ph.D. Computer Science Department, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong II, G. F.: 1982, ‘An Overview of the FRUMP System’, in W. G. Lehnert and M. H. Ringle (eds.), Strategies for Natural Language Understanding, (pp. 149–176), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S.: 1986, Mind Over Machine, Macmillan, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, M. G.: 1983, In-Depth Understanding: A Computer Model of Integrated Processing for Narrative Comprehension, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, M. G.: (in press), ‘Symbolic NeuroEngineering for Natural Language Processing: A Multilevel Research Approach’, in J. Barnden and J. Pollack (eds.), Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory 1, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, M. G., Cullingford, R. and Alvarado, S. J.: 1987, ‘SCRIPTS’, in Shapiro (ed.), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, John Wiley and Sons, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, M., Flowers, M. and Wang, Y. A.: (in press), ‘Distributed Symbol Discovery through Symbol Recirculation: Toward Natural Language Pocessing in Distributed Connectionist Networks’, in Reilly and Sharkey (eds.), Connectionist Approaches to Natural Language Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, M., Hodges, J. and Flowers, M.: (in press), ‘Computer Comprehension of Mechanical Device Descriptions’, in J. Gero (ed.), Knowledge-Based Systems in Engineering and Architecture, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M.: 1987, Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection, Basic Books, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. L.: 1988, ‘Finding Structure in Time’, Technical Report 8801, Center for Research in Language, UCSD, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. L.: 1989, ‘Structured Representations and Connectionist Models’, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 17–25), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. A.: 1989, ‘Neural Representation of Conceptual Knowledge’, in Nadel, Cooper, Culicover and Harnish (eds.), Neural Connections, Mental Computation, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. A. and Ballard, D. H.: 1982, ‘Connectionist Models and Their Properties’, Cognitive Science 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshyn, Z. W.: 1988, ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis’, in Pinker and Mehler (eds.), Connections and Symbols, Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S., Dyer, M. G. and Flowers, M.: 1988, ‘Representing Contractual Situations’, in C. Walter (ed.), Computer Power and Legal Language: The Use of Computational Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Expert Systems in Law, (pp.99–118), Quorum Books, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (ed.): 1987, Categorial Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition, Cambridge University Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S.: 1990, ‘The Symbol Grounding Problem’, Physica D.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendler, J. A.: 1988a, Integrated Marker-Passing and Problem-Solving: A Spreading Activation Approach to Improved Choice in Planning, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendler, J. A.: 1988a, ‘Problem Solving and Reasoning: A Connectionist Perspective’, Technical Report CS-TR-2161, Computer Science Department, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, P. A. and Seidenberg, M. S.: 1989, ‘Is There “Catastrophic Interference” in Connectionist Networks?’, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of The Cognitive Science Society, (pp. 26–33), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E.: 1986, ‘Distributed Representations’, in Rumelhart and McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing 1, Bradford Book/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T., and Tienson, J.: 1988, ‘Settling into a New Paradigm’, in T. Horgan and J. Tienson (eds.), Spindel Conference 1987: Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind, XXVI, (pp. 97–113), Supplement of The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Memphis State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T.: 1988, Self-Organization and Associative Memory, (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag, Secaucus, NJ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, T. E. and Dyer, M. G.: 1989a, ‘Dynamic, Non-Local Role Bindings and Inferencing in a Localist Network for Natural Language Understanding’, in D. Touretzky (ed.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, T. E. and Dyer, M. G.: 1989b, ‘Frame Selection in a Connectionist Model of High-Level Inferencing’, Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Cog-Sci-89), Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, T. E. and Dyer, M. G.: 1989c, ‘High-Level Inferencing in a Connectionist Network’, Connection Science 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, T. E., Vidal, J. J. and Dyer, M. G.: (in press), ‘Phase Locking of Artificial Neural Oscillators Can Perform Dynamic Role-Bindings and Inferencing’, Neurocomputers and Attention: Proceedings in Nonlinear Science, Manchester University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G.: 1991, ‘Learning Distributed Representations of Conceptual Knowledge and Their Application to Script/Goal/Plan-Based Story Processing’. Computer Science Department, Ph.D., UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., Flowers, M. and Dyer, M. G.: 1990, ‘Learning Distributed Representations For Conceptual Knowledge and Their Application to Script-Based Story Processing’, Connection Science 2(4), 313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnern, W. G.: (in press), ‘Symbolic/Subsymbolic Sentence Analysis: Exploiting the Best of Two Worlds’, in J. Bamden and J. Pollack, Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory 1, Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miikkulainen, R. and Dyer, M. G.: 1988, ‘Forming Global Representations with Extended Backpropagation’, Proceedings of the IEEE Second Annual International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN-88), San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miikkulainen, R. and Dyer, M. G.: 1989a, ‘Encoding Input/Output Representations in Connectionist Cognitive Systems’, in Touretzky, Hinton and Sejnowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 1988 Connectionist Models Summerschool, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miikkulainen, R. and Dyer, M. G.: 1989b, ‘A Modular Neural Network Architecture for Sequential Paraphrasing of Script-Based Stories’, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN-89), Washington D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miikkulainen, R. and Dyer, M. G.: (in press), ’Natural Language Processing with Modular PDP Networks and Distributed Lexicon, Cognitive Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A: 1981, ‘The Knowledge Level’, AI Magazine 2(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazzani, M. J. and Dyer, M. G.: 1989, ‘Memory Organization and Explanation-Based Learning’, Expert Systems: Research and Applications 2(3), 331–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. and Prince, A.: 1988, ‘On Language and Connectionism: Analysis of a Parallel Distributed Processing Model of Language Acquisition’, in Pinker and Mehler (eds), Connections and Symbols, Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, J.: 1987, Connectionist Models of Natural Language Processing, Ph.D University of Illinois (Computing Research Laboratory, Technical Report MCCS-87-100 New Mexico State University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, J.: 1988, ‘Recursive Auto-Associative Memory: Devising Compositional Distributed Representations’, in Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, J.: 1989, ‘Implications of Recursive Distributed Representations’, in D. S. Touretzky (ed.), Advances in Neural Information Processing 1, (pp. 527–536), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilici, A., Dyer, M. G., and Rowers, M.: 1988, ‘Recognizing and Responding to Plan-Oriented Misconceptions’, in Computational Linguistics 14(3), 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., and McClelland, J. L. (eds.): 1986a, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations Into the Micmstructure of Cognition, (Vols. 1 and 2), Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D., Hinton, G. and Williams, R.: 1986, ‘Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation’, in Rumelhart and McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R.: 1977, Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, LEA Press, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C: 1982, Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People, Cambridge University Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servan-Schreiber, D., Cleermans, A. and McClelland, J. L.: 1989, ‘Learning Sequential Behavior in Simple Recurrent Networks’, in D. S. Touretzky (ed.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1, (pp. 643–652), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shastri, L.: 1988, Semantic Networks: An Evidential Formalization and its Connectionist Realization, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarda, A. and Freeman, W. J.: 1987, ‘How Brains Make Chaos In Order To Make Sense of the World’, in Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P.: 1987, ‘A Method for Connectionist Variable Binding’, Technical Report CU-CS-356-87, Department of Computer Science and Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P.: 1988a, ‘The Constituent Structure of Connectionist Mental States: A Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn’, in T. Horgan and J. Tienson (eds.), Spindel Conference 1987: Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind XXVI, Supplement of The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Memphis State University, Memphis, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P.: 1988b, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism’, in The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S.: 1983, From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief, Bradford Books/MIT Press, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumida, R. A., and Dyer, M. G.: 1989, ‘Storing and Generalizing Multiple Instances While Maintaining Knowledge-Level Parallelism’, in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-89), (pp.1426–1431), Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumida, R. A., Dyer, M. G., and Flowers, M.: 1988, ‘Integrating Marker Passing and Connectionism for Handling Conceptual and Structural Ambiguities’, in Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, P.: 1989, ‘A Sequential Network for Musical Applications’, in D. Touretzky, G. Hinton and T. Sejnowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 1988 Connectionist Models Summerschool, (pp. 76–84), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomabechi, H. and Kitano, H.: 1989, ‘Beyond PDP: The Frequency Modulation Neural Network Architecture’, in Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (pp. 186–192), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touretzky, D.S.: 1989, ‘Connectionism and PP Attachment’, in Touretzky, Hinton and Sejnowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 1988 Connectionist Models Summerschool, (pp. 325–332), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touretzky, D. S. and Hinton, G. E.: 1988, ‘A Distributed Connectionist Production System’, in Cognitive Science 12 (3), 423–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von der Gardner, L. A.: 1987, An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning, Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werter, S. and Lehnert, W. G.: (in press), ‘Noun Phrase Analysis with Connectionist Networks’, in N. Sharkey and R. Reilly (eds.), Connectionist Approaches to Language Processing, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zernik, U. and Dyer, M. G.: 1987, ‘The Self-Extending Phrasal Lexicon’, in Computational Linguistics 13 (3–4), 308–327.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dyer, M.G. (1991). Connectionism Versus Symbolism in High-Level Cognition. In: Horgan, T., Tienson, J. (eds) Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3524-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3524-5_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5559-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3524-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics