Abstract
One of the ways to honor Husserl is to reflect on the developments which have taken place in his philosophical legacy. We honor him as the hero of a philosophical undertaking which, in this tormented century of ours, opposed the barbarism of modern warfare, intolerance, racism, and the exploitation of the destructive potential of science and technology with a rational dream of humankind striving to forge bonds of solidarity on the indestructible foundation of living reason.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
P. Ricoeur, Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology, trans. E. G. Ballard and L. E. Embree (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967), pp. 3–4.
P. Ricoeur, “On Interpretation,” in After Philosophy: End or Transformation?, ed. by K. Baynes, J. Bohman, and T. McCarthy (Cambridge, Mass. and London: The MIT Press, 1987), p. 370. This text was originally conceived for an English language readership and was published in Philosophy in France Today, ed. by A. Montefiore (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983). The corresponding French text was published, slightly abridged, in P. Ricoeur, Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II (Paris: Seuil, 1986), p. 25.
P. Ricoeur, “On Interpretation,” in After Philosophy: End or Transformation?, ed. by K. Baynes, J. Bohman, and T. McCarthy (Cambridge, Mass. and London: The MIT Press, 1987), p. 371; French text, pp. 25–26.
P. Ricoeur, “On Interpretation,” in After Philosophy: End or Transformation?, ed. by K. Baynes, J. Bohman, and T. McCarthy (Cambridge, Mass. and London: The MIT Press, 1987), p. 372; French text, p. 27.
Cf. P. Ricoeur, Le conflit des interprétations. Essais d’herméneutique (Paris: Seuil, 1969), p. 242; English trans, by W. Domingo et al., The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974), p. 246.
On language as the verbal body of thought, see P. Thevenaz, L’homme et sa raison, Vol. II (Neuchåtel: La Baconnière, 1956), pp. 49–72; on Thévenaz see D. Jervolino, Pierre Thévenaz e la filosofia senza assoluto (Naples: Athena, 1984).
Cf. “Phénoménologie et herméneutique” in P. Ricoeur, Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II (Paris: Seuil, 1986), pp. 39–75; an English translation of this essay, which we shall use here, is found in P. Ricoeur, Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, ed. by J. B. Thompson (Cambridge and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison de Sciences de l’Homme, 1981), pp. 101–128.
D. Jervolino, Il cogito e Vermeneutica. La questione del soggetto in Ricoeur (Naples: Procaccini, 1984), pp. 121–140.
Ricoeur, 201CPhénoménologie et herméneutique” in P. Ricoeur, Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II (Paris: Seuil, 1986), p. 45; English trans., p. 105.
Ricoeur, 201CPhénoménologie et herméneutique” in P. Ricoeur, Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II (Paris: Seuil, 1986), p. 40; English trans., p. 101.
Ricoeur, 201CPhénoménologie et herméneutique” in P. Ricoeur, Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II (Paris: Seuil, 1986), p. 62; English trans., p. 119.
Ricoeur, 201CPhénoménologie et herméneutique” in P. Ricoeur, Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II (Paris: Seuil, 1986), p. 72; English trans., p. 128.
Cf. P. Ricoeur, “Fifth Cartesian Meditation”, in Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology, trans. E. G. Ballard and L. E. Embree (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967), pp. 115–142; French text in Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II (Paris: Seuil, 1986), pp. 197–225.
P. Ricoeur, Temps et récit, Vol. III (Paris: Seuil, 1985), p. 355; English trans, by K. Blarney and D. Pellauer, Time and Narrative, Vol. III (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1988), p. 246.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jervolino, D. (1991). Ricoeur and Husserl: Towards a Hermeneutic Phenomenology. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Husserl’s Legacy in Phenomenological Philosophies. Analecta Husserliana, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3368-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3368-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5489-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3368-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive