Abstract
The 1st World Congress of Phenomenology, which has brought us together here in the ancient University of Santiago de Compostela, has been organized to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of the death of Husserl by reviewing his phenomenological legacy, which has had so much influence on the philosophy of our time. The philosophical movement stemming from Phenomenology has served to restore confidence to thinkers who feared the crisis of metaphysics to be so acute that their only option was to limit it to particular sciences and, within these, to the determination and analysis of phenomena sensu stricto. The causes of this crisis — of the suspectness with which metaphysical investigation had come to be regarded — were twofold. On the one hand, certain metaphysicians, in an attempt to attain to content absolutely unconditioned by form as a metaphysical equivalent of the fulcrum with which Archimedes would have moved the world, had in fact done no more than defy the spatio-temporal limits established by Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason; among the philosophers of this tendency may be included all those following the one-sided monist tradition of Parmenides, Plotinus, Spinoza, Schelling and Hegel.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Zubiri, X., Naturaleza, Historia, Dios: Hegel y el problema metafisico, 9th edition (Madrid: Alianza Editorial 1987), p. 271.
Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), pp. 379
Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), pp. 380.
Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1800), in Akad-Ausg., I, 6, p. 285.
Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1800), in Akad-Ausg., I, 6, p. 209.
Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1800), in Akad-Ausg., I, 6, pp. 199
Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1800), in Akad-Ausg., I, 6, pp. 308. Cfr. Akad-Ausg., I, 2, p. 427 (“Nature” is used here in its original sense, the Nat-Ur of the physis).
Fichte, J.G., W-L nova methodo (1798), IV, 2, p. 49.
Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), pp. 379
Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), 380.
Fichte, J. G., Nachgelassene Schriften, Vol. II, Jacob (ed.) (Berlin: 1934), p. 590.
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage dergesammten W-L, (1794), Akad-Ausg., I, 2, pp. 267
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage dergesammten W-L, (1794), Akad-Ausg., I, 2, pp. 268.
Husserl, E, Husserliana, Ges. Werke., VI, (The Hague: 1950–62), pp. 205
Husserl, E, Husserliana, Ges. Werke., VI, (The Hague: 1950–62), pp. 206.
Kuntze, F., Die Philosophie Salomon Maimons, Heidelberg, 1912, pp. 347–357. Kuntze’s account of the relationship between Fichte and Maimon is very detailed.
Fichte, J. G., Die Wissenschaftslehre (1804), Akad-Ausg., II, 8, p. 206.
Fichte, J. G., Die Wissenschaftslehre (1804), Akad-Ausg., II, 8, p. 206.
Archives de Philosophie, April–June 1985, pp. 336–7.
Fichte, J. G., Nachgelassene Schriften, Vol. II, 6, Lauth and Gliwitzky(eds.) (Stuttgart: 1983), p. 462.
Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), French edition, pp. 228
Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), 229.
Fichte, J. G., W-L nova methodo, Akad.-Ausg., IV, 2, p. 253. According to Fichte, “the consciousness of individuality is necessarily accompanied by another consciousness, that of a you, and is only possible with this condition” (cf. S. W., I, p. 476; H, pp. 600, 603, 608, 618, 625, 665; III, pp. 8, 35, 47, 56, 61, 66, 72).
Husserl, E., Ideas (Epilogue), Spanish edition (Mexico City and Buenos Aires: F. C. E. 1962), p. 387.
Vuillemin, J., L’Heritage kantien et la révolution copernicienne (Paris: PUF, 1954), p. 89 (Cfr. Fichte, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 203, 204).
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, (1794), Akad.-Ausg., I, 2, pp. 326 and 415.
Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen, 1800, Akad.-Ausg., I, 6, p. 259.
Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen, 1800, p. 201.
Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen, 1800, p. 201. Fichte goes on to state that “I am what I am because this combined instantiation of all the natural laws could only produce an individual like me, and no other”.
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad.-Ausg., I, 2, p. 416.
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad.-Ausg., I, 2, p. 416.
Hegel, G. W. F., Lecciones sobre historia de la filosofia, Vol. III, (Mexico City: F.C.E., 1977), p. 479.
Fichte, J. G., Einige Vorlesungen die Bestimmung des Gelehrten, 1974, in S. W., VI, pp. 304, 306. Cf. Die Bestimmung des Menschen, Akad.-Ausg., I, 6, pp. 262–263 and 294–295.
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad-Ausg., I, 2, p. 411.
Husserl, E., Ideen, in Husserliana, Ges. Werke, I, p. 68. My italics. Cf. Fichte, J. G., Akad.-Ausg., I, 2, p. 411, 412 and II, 8, pp. 173, 174.
Fichte, J. G., Die Wissenschaftslehre, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 117, 118.
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad.-Ausg., p. 414. Elsewhere, he adds that “this was precisely the difficulty of any philosophy that wished to avoid dualism and seriously sought unity: it was God or us, one of the two had to be eliminated” (W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, p. 114).
Fichte, J. G., W-L., 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 231, 232 and 54, p. 112.
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, II, 8, pp. 260, 369 and I, 4, p. 253.
Husserl, E., Ideen, in Husserliana, Ges. Werke, I, p. 67.
Husserl, E., idem., p. 72.
Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 413, 414 (cfr. Footnote 8 therein).
Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, p. 114.
Fichte, J. G., Nachgelassene Schriften, II (Berlin: Jacob, 1937), p. 248.
Husserl, E., Husserliana, XIV, p. 260.
Husserl, E., Husserliana, XV, Text No. 38, Zeiligung-Monade, 1934, pp. 666
Husserl, E., Husserliana, XV, Text No. 38, Zeiligung-Monade, 1934, pp. 669.
Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, p. 231.
Fichte, J. G., Akad.-Ausg., IV, 1, p. 369.
Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 115, 116. For Fichte, Spinoza’s doctrine is a form of qualitative realism that from absolutely objectivized Substance derives two attributes (thought and extension) and an infinity of modes. Thus all subjectivity is derived from objectivity.
Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804.
Fichte, J. G., Erste Einleitung on [?] die W-L, 1797, Akad.-Ausg., I, 4, p. 191.
Hegel, G. W. F., Differenz des Fichteschen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie, Jubiläumsausgabe, (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: 1965), pp. 83 et seq.
Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad-Ausg., I, 2, p. 268.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
González, M.R. (1991). Phenomenological Convergences between Fichte and Husserl. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Husserl’s Legacy in Phenomenological Philosophies. Analecta Husserliana, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3368-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3368-5_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5489-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3368-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive