Skip to main content

Phenomenological Convergences between Fichte and Husserl

  • Chapter
Husserl’s Legacy in Phenomenological Philosophies

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 36))

  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

The 1st World Congress of Phenomenology, which has brought us together here in the ancient University of Santiago de Compostela, has been organized to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of the death of Husserl by reviewing his phenomenological legacy, which has had so much influence on the philosophy of our time. The philosophical movement stemming from Phenomenology has served to restore confidence to thinkers who feared the crisis of metaphysics to be so acute that their only option was to limit it to particular sciences and, within these, to the determination and analysis of phenomena sensu stricto. The causes of this crisis — of the suspectness with which metaphysical investigation had come to be regarded — were twofold. On the one hand, certain metaphysicians, in an attempt to attain to content absolutely unconditioned by form as a metaphysical equivalent of the fulcrum with which Archimedes would have moved the world, had in fact done no more than defy the spatio-temporal limits established by Kant in the Critique of Pure Reason; among the philosophers of this tendency may be included all those following the one-sided monist tradition of Parmenides, Plotinus, Spinoza, Schelling and Hegel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Zubiri, X., Naturaleza, Historia, Dios: Hegel y el problema metafisico, 9th edition (Madrid: Alianza Editorial 1987), p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), pp. 379

    Google Scholar 

  3. Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), pp. 380.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1800), in Akad-Ausg., I, 6, p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1800), in Akad-Ausg., I, 6, p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1800), in Akad-Ausg., I, 6, pp. 199

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1800), in Akad-Ausg., I, 6, pp. 308. Cfr. Akad-Ausg., I, 2, p. 427 (“Nature” is used here in its original sense, the Nat-Ur of the physis).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fichte, J.G., W-L nova methodo (1798), IV, 2, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), pp. 379

    Google Scholar 

  10. Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), 380.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fichte, J. G., Nachgelassene Schriften, Vol. II, Jacob (ed.) (Berlin: 1934), p. 590.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fichte, J. G., Grundlage dergesammten W-L, (1794), Akad-Ausg., I, 2, pp. 267

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fichte, J. G., Grundlage dergesammten W-L, (1794), Akad-Ausg., I, 2, pp. 268.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Husserl, E, Husserliana, Ges. Werke., VI, (The Hague: 1950–62), pp. 205

    Google Scholar 

  15. Husserl, E, Husserliana, Ges. Werke., VI, (The Hague: 1950–62), pp. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuntze, F., Die Philosophie Salomon Maimons, Heidelberg, 1912, pp. 347–357. Kuntze’s account of the relationship between Fichte and Maimon is very detailed.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fichte, J. G., Die Wissenschaftslehre (1804), Akad-Ausg., II, 8, p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fichte, J. G., Die Wissenschaftslehre (1804), Akad-Ausg., II, 8, p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Archives de Philosophie, April–June 1985, pp. 336–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fichte, J. G., Nachgelassene Schriften, Vol. II, 6, Lauth and Gliwitzky(eds.) (Stuttgart: 1983), p. 462.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), French edition, pp. 228

    Google Scholar 

  22. Husserl, E., Die Krisis des europäischen Menschentums und die Philosophie, in Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Philosophie (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), 229.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fichte, J. G., W-L nova methodo, Akad.-Ausg., IV, 2, p. 253. According to Fichte, “the consciousness of individuality is necessarily accompanied by another consciousness, that of a you, and is only possible with this condition” (cf. S. W., I, p. 476; H, pp. 600, 603, 608, 618, 625, 665; III, pp. 8, 35, 47, 56, 61, 66, 72).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Husserl, E., Ideas (Epilogue), Spanish edition (Mexico City and Buenos Aires: F. C. E. 1962), p. 387.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vuillemin, J., L’Heritage kantien et la révolution copernicienne (Paris: PUF, 1954), p. 89 (Cfr. Fichte, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 203, 204).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, (1794), Akad.-Ausg., I, 2, pp. 326 and 415.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen, 1800, Akad.-Ausg., I, 6, p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen, 1800, p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fichte, J. G., Die Bestimmung des Menschen, 1800, p. 201. Fichte goes on to state that “I am what I am because this combined instantiation of all the natural laws could only produce an individual like me, and no other”.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad.-Ausg., I, 2, p. 416.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad.-Ausg., I, 2, p. 416.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hegel, G. W. F., Lecciones sobre historia de la filosofia, Vol. III, (Mexico City: F.C.E., 1977), p. 479.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fichte, J. G., Einige Vorlesungen die Bestimmung des Gelehrten, 1974, in S. W., VI, pp. 304, 306. Cf. Die Bestimmung des Menschen, Akad.-Ausg., I, 6, pp. 262–263 and 294–295.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad-Ausg., I, 2, p. 411.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Husserl, E., Ideen, in Husserliana, Ges. Werke, I, p. 68. My italics. Cf. Fichte, J. G., Akad.-Ausg., I, 2, p. 411, 412 and II, 8, pp. 173, 174.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fichte, J. G., Die Wissenschaftslehre, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 117, 118.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad.-Ausg., p. 414. Elsewhere, he adds that “this was precisely the difficulty of any philosophy that wished to avoid dualism and seriously sought unity: it was God or us, one of the two had to be eliminated” (W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, p. 114).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fichte, J. G., W-L., 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 231, 232 and 54, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, II, 8, pp. 260, 369 and I, 4, p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Husserl, E., Ideen, in Husserliana, Ges. Werke, I, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Husserl, E., idem., p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 413, 414 (cfr. Footnote 8 therein).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fichte, J. G., Nachgelassene Schriften, II (Berlin: Jacob, 1937), p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Husserl, E., Husserliana, XIV, p. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Husserl, E., Husserliana, XV, Text No. 38, Zeiligung-Monade, 1934, pp. 666

    Google Scholar 

  47. Husserl, E., Husserliana, XV, Text No. 38, Zeiligung-Monade, 1934, pp. 669.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fichte, J. G., Akad.-Ausg., IV, 1, p. 369.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804, Akad.-Ausg., II, 8, pp. 115, 116. For Fichte, Spinoza’s doctrine is a form of qualitative realism that from absolutely objectivized Substance derives two attributes (thought and extension) and an infinity of modes. Thus all subjectivity is derived from objectivity.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Fichte, J. G., W-L, 1804.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fichte, J. G., Erste Einleitung on [?] die W-L, 1797, Akad.-Ausg., I, 4, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hegel, G. W. F., Differenz des Fichteschen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie, Jubiläumsausgabe, (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: 1965), pp. 83 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fichte, J. G., Grundlage der gesammten W-L, Akad-Ausg., I, 2, p. 268.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

González, M.R. (1991). Phenomenological Convergences between Fichte and Husserl. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Husserl’s Legacy in Phenomenological Philosophies. Analecta Husserliana, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3368-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3368-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5489-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3368-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics