Abstract
This paper proposes a different point of view about the interpretation of EU models. It looks at the role of OR and AND aggregations in their construction and gives a fairly general setting for the study of these connectives. Finally, it examines which conditions may justify the traditional EU models and which novelties may derive from their weakening.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bacchelli, B.: 1986, ‘Representation of continuous associative functions’, Stochastica, vol. 10, 13–28.
Chateauneuf, A.: 1988, ‘Decomposable measures, distorted probabilities and concave capacities’, presented at FUR-88.
Dombi, J.: 1982, ‘Basic concepts for a theory of evaluation: the aggregative operator’, Eur. J. of Operations Research, vol. 10, 282–293.
Dubois, D. and H. Prade: 1982, ‘A class of fuzzy measures based on triangular norms’, Int. J. of General Systems, vol. 8, 43–61.
Gilboa, I.: 1987, ‘Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities’, J. of Mathematical Economics, vol. 16, 65–88.
Jaffray, J.: 1988, ‘Linear utility theory for belief functions’, presented at FUR-88.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1979, ‘Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica, vol. 47, 263–291.
Ling, C.H.: 1965, ‘Representation of associative functions’, Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen, vol. 12, 189–212.
Loomes, G. and R. Sugden: 1982, ‘Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty’, Economic Journal, vol. 92, 805–824.
Quiggin, J.: 1982, ‘A theory of anticipated utility’, J. of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 3, 225–243.
Schmeidler, D.: 1984, ‘Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity’, IMA Preprint Series, University of Minnesota.
Schweizer, B. and A. Sklar: 1983, Probabilistic metric spaces, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Sierpinski, W.: 1934, ‘Remarques sur les fonctions de plusieurs variables réelles’, Prace mat.-fiz., vol. 41, 171–175.
Suárez GarcÃa, F. and P. Gil Alvarez: 1986, ‘Two families of fuzzy integrals’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 18, 67–81.
Weber, S.: 1986, ‘Two integrals and some modified versions-critical remarks’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, 97–105.
Yaari, M.E.: 1987, ‘The dual theory of choice under risk’, Econometrica, vol. 55, 95–115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li Calzi, M. (1991). The Expected Utility Model As An Aggregation Procedure. In: Chikán, A. (eds) Progress in Decision, Utility and Risk Theory. Theory and Decision Library, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3146-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3146-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5387-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3146-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive