Abstract
Allow me a word of introduction about the structure of our discussion. Descartes, Kant and some other thinkers will have a role in this talk, in addition to Husserl. Its focus, however, will definitely be Husserl’s conception, and the first two chapters of Husserl’s Cartesian Meditations were chosen as the main text for analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bergman, S. H.: 1980, The Philosophy of Immanuel Kant (Hebrew).
Descartes, R.: 1931, The Philosophical Works, trans. by E. S. Haldane and G. R. T.Ross.
Husserl, E.: 1960, Cartesian Meditations, trans, by D. Cairns.
Kant, I.: 1961, Critique of Pure Reason, trans, by N. K. Smith.
Kern, I.: 1964, Husserl und Kant.
Levin, D.M.: 1975, “Huserl’sNotionof Self-evidence” in E.Pivcevic(ed.),Phenomenology and Philosophical Understanding.
Ricoeur, P.: 1967, Husserl: An Analysis of his Phenomenology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bar-On, A.Z. (1993). Reason and Reasoning: Husserl’s Way. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Reason, Life, Culture. Analecta Husserliana, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1862-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1862-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4823-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1862-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive