Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 40))

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a synthesis of my research into the problem of the self in Hume. The copious bibliography available on this topic indicates that the subject I suggest to discuss is problematic but also of crucial interest. I propose to develop the following argument, namely, that there exists in Hume a psychological awareness of the self. There is no incompatibility between the denial of personal identity in A Treatise of Human Nature Book I, and the arguments put forward in Book II Of the Passions, and in Book III, Of the Understanding of Morals. I shall maintain that Hume is not elaborating an ontological but a psychological theory of the self. This represents a new departure with regard to the philosophy of his time. On the other hand, I consider Hume’s critique on the self as a substance as pertinent if one takes substance in the Cartesian sense of the word. However, his critique or his denial of an abstract identity of the seif does not mean that he denies the possibility of our knowing ourselves. For Hume it is possible for us to know who we are. I would express this in a rather paradoxical Statement: “Every man needs to know what he is in order to be so”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E. Gilson, Edition of Descartes’ Discours de la méthode (Paris: Vrin, 1930), p. 437 in Risieri Frondizi, The Nature of the Self (Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1953 and 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Noxon, Hume’s Philosophical Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973), p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. F. Montero, ’El descubrimiento del yo’, Revista de filosofía, CSIC XX, 61, No. 76 (1958), pp. 337–363.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Noxon, Hume’s Philosophical Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. D. Livingston, Hume’s Philosophy of Common Life (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Also N. Phillipson,Hume, Historian on Historians (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Choza, Manual de Antropología Filosófica (Madrid: Ed. Rialp, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Merleau-Ponty. Phenomenology of Perception (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trans. C. Smith; Le Visible et Vinvisible (Paris: Ed. Gallimard, 1964)

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Ricoeur, “Human Beings as a Subject of Philosophy”, at the XVIIIth World Philosophy Conference (August 1988), in Brighton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Duhan, “Ambiguity of Time, Self, and Philosophical Explanation in Merleau-Ponty, Husserl, and Hume”, Auslegung 13 (1987), pp. 126–138.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. J. Vicente, “Yo y persona. El problema del sujeto en Wittgenstein”, Anuario Filosófico XIII (1985), pp. 128–129; G. E. M. Anscombe, The First Person, pp. 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Hernandez Borque, “Hume y Merleau-Ponty, filósofos de la experiencia”, Anales del Seminario de Meîafísica, Madrid XI (1976), p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Madell, Identity and Personal Identity (Edinburgh: The University Press, 1981 and 1984) 148 p.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Rábade Romeo, Hume y el fenomenismo moderno (Madrid: Ed. Gredos, 1975), p. 341; “Mejor aún, diríamos que la negación apunta directamente a negar que se pueda epistemologicamente justificar un conocimiento del yo como sustancia o como realidad necesitada de un sustrato permanente que le sirve de soporte”.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. P. Maher, “Probability in Hume’s Science of Man”, Hume Studies VII, No. 2 (1981), pp. 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, ed. Norman Kemp Smith, LL. A. (New York: Bobbs-Merril, 2 ed., 1947), p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. N. Capaldi, David Hume. The Newtonian Philosopher (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cf. F. M. Berenson, Understanding Persons (Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Deleuze, Empirisme et subjectivité (Paris: PUF, 1973), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cf. T. Penelhum, “Hume’s Theory of the Self Revisited”, Dialogue 14 (1975), pp. 389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elósegui, M. (1993). Hume on the Phenomenological Discovery of the Self. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Manifestations of Reason: Life, Historicity, Culture Reason, Life, Culture Part II. Analecta Husserliana, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1677-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1677-0_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4733-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1677-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics