Skip to main content

Sexual communication in copepods and rotifers

  • Conference paper
Rotifer Symposium VI

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 83))

Abstract

The problem of locating mates and identifying them as conspecifics is similar for Copepoda, Cladocera, and Rotifera since they are all relatively small animals moving in a large volume of water. Chemoreception is a potentially effective means of identifying mates in aquatic environments. In zooplankton, mate recognition systems based on chemoreception have evolved which can distinguish conspecifics from other species and can discriminate males from females. The evidence for the role of chemical signals in copepod mating is indirect, based on observations of mating behavior. The small size and limited metabolic capability of zooplankton, and high diffusion rates at 1–10 mm spatial scales, restrict the volume through which chemical signals can be effectively transmitted. An alternative to using diffusible molecules for sexual communication is to bind signal molecules to cell surfaces, allowing energetically costly molecules like proteins to serve as signals without their loss through diffusion. Contact chemore eption has been described in copepod and rotifer mating and perhaps represents a general solution to the problem of chemical communication by small zooplankters. The types of signals used, their mechanisms of transmiss on and reception, and their role in maintaining reproductive isolation among species has yet to be characterized for any aquatic invertebrate. In this review, I compare the methods used by copepods and rotifers for mate seeking and recognition, describe the behavioral evidence supporting the existence of chemical cues, and examine experiments describing the biochemical characteristics of the signal molecules.In copepods, male mate seeking behavior occurs without previous female contact, suggesting the reception of a diffusible signal. The signal molecule is small and lacks species specificity in the species investigated. Male rotifers do not respond to females from a distance. Mates are located by random male swimming and contact chemoreception of a species-specific signal. Mate recognition in both copepods and rotifers is based on contact chemoreception of a species-specific signal. The pheromones responsible are not known for copepods, but surface glycoproteins with pheromonal activity have been identified in rotifers. The structure of the rotifer sex pheromone has been probed by selective enzymatic degradation and lectin binding, electrophoretic characterization, and attachment to agarose beads to assess its biological activity. Glycoproteins play a key role in the sexual communication of some algal and ciliate species and have well characterized roles in cellular recognition phenomena like sperm-egg binding. The significance of these studies lies in their contribution to our understanding of zooplankton reproductive biology, the chemical ecology of male-female communication, the molecular basis of chemoreception in the aquatic environment, and the evolution of pre-mating reproductive isolating mechanisms in zooplankton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aloia, R. C. & R. L. Moretti, 1973. Mating behavior and the ultrastructure of copulation in the rotifer Asplanchna brightwelli Trans. am. Microsc. Soc. 90: 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atema, J., R. R. Fay, A. N. Popper & W. N. Tavolga, 1988. Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals. New York, SpringerVerlag.936 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atema, J. & R. B. Gagosian, 1973. Behavioral responses of male lobsters to ecdysones. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 2: 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blades, P. I., 1977. Mating behavior of Centropages typicus. Mar. Biol. 40: 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blades, P. I. & M. J. Youngbluth, 1979. Mating behavior of Labidocera aestiva (Copepoda: Calanoida). Mar. Biol. 51: 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blades, P. I. & M. J. Youngbluth, 1980. Morphological, physiological and behavioral aspects of mating in calanoid copepods.In: Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities W. C. Kerfoot (ed.), Hanover, New Hampshire, University Press of New England, pp. 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert, W. H. & E. O. Wilson, 1963. The analysis of olfactory communication among animals. J. theor. Biol. 5: 443– 469.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carde, R. T. &T. C. Baker, 1984. Sexual communication with pheromones. In: Chemical Ecology of Insects, W. J. &. R. T. C. Bell (eds), Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates, pp. 355–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. E. S., 1988. The molecular nature of chemical stimuli in the aquatic environment. In: Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals, J. Atema R. R. Fay, A. N. Popper & W. N. Tavolga (eds), New York, Springer-Verlag, pp. 3– 27.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chow-Fraser, P. & E. J. Maly, 1988. Aspects of mating, reproduction,and co-occurrence in three freshwater calanoid copepods. Freshwater Biol. 19: 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, L., P. C. Belvedere, A. Marconato & F. Bentivegna,1982, Pheromones in teleost fish. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Reproductive Physiology of Fish, C. J. J. Richter & H. J. T. Goos (eds), Wageningen,Netherlands, Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, P. J., 1978. Sex pheromones in Crustacea. Biol. Rev. 53: 555–583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleminger, A., 1967. Taxononmy, distribution, and polymorphism in the Labidocera jollae group with remarks on evolution within the group (Copepoda: Calanoida). Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 120: 1–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1963. Contact chemoreception, mating behaviour,and sexual isolation in the rotifer genus Brachionus. J. exp. Biol. 40: 625–641.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J., 1983. Rotifera. In: Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates,R. G. Adiyodi & K. G. Adiyodi (eds), New York, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 181–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glabe, C. G., L. B. Grabel, V. D. Vacquier & S. D. Rosen, 1982. Carbohydrate specificity of sea urchin sperm binding: A cell surface lectin mediating sperm-egg adhesion. J. Cell. Biol. 94: 123–129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, R. A., 1980. Pheromone communication in the reproductive behavior of the crab, Callinectes sapidus. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 7: 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, R. A., M. A. Adams & A. B. I. Smith, 1984. Characterization of a sex pheromone in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus: crustecdysone studies. J. Chem. Ecol. 10: 913–921.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, I. J., R. C. Hughes, M. Monsigny, T. Osawa & N. Sharon, 1980. What are lectins? Nature 285: 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, A. M. & B. W. Frost, 1976. Chemical communication in the marine planktonic copepods Calanus pacificus and Pseudocalanus sp. Crustaceana. 30: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J., 1961. Laboratory cultivation of the marine copepod Pseudodiaptomus coronatus Williams. Limnol. Oceanogr.6: 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, C. A. & M. J. Youngbluth, 1983. Mating behavior in three species of Pseudodiaptomus (Copepoda: Calanoida). Mar. Biol. 76: 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katona, S. A., 1973. Evidence for sex pheromones in planktonic copepods. Limnol. Ocean. 81: 574–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katona, S. K., 1975. Copulation in the copepod Eurytemora affinis (Poppe, 1880). Crustaceana. 28: 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittredge, J. S., M. Terry & F. T. Takahash, 1971. Sex pheromone activity of the molting hormone, crustecdysone, on male crabs. Fish. Bull. 69: 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittredge, J. S., F. T. Takahashi, J. Lindsey & R. Lasker, 1974. Chemical signals in the sea: Marine allelochemics and evolution. Fish. Bull. 72: 1–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, T., T. Tokoroyama, Y. Tsukuda, H. Koiama & A. Miyake, 1973. Isolation and structure determination of blepharismin, a conjugation initiating gamone in the ciliate Blepharisma. Science. 179: 400–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzaretto, I., B. Salvato & A. Libertini, 1990. Evidence of chemical signalling in Trigriopus fulvus (Copepoda, Harpacticoida).Crustaceana. 59: 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luporini, P. & C. Miceli, 1986. Mating Pheromones. In: The Molecular Biology of Ciliated Protozoa, J. G. Gall (ed.), New York, Academic Press, pp. 263–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, A. M. & P. T. Grant, 1974. Interspecies and intraspecies chemoreception by marine invertebrates. In: Chemoreception in Marine Organisms, P. T. &. A. M. M. Grant (eds), New York, Academic Press, pp. 105–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A. & J. Beyer, 1974. Blepharmone: A conjugationinducing glycoprotein in the ciliate Blepharisma. Science. 185: 621–623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. H., 1902. The reactions of copepods to various stimuli and the bearing of this on daily depth migrations. Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm. 21: 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, N. & H. Lis, 1989. Lectins as cell recognition molecules.Science. 246: 227–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & C. A. Hawkinson, 1983. Behavioral reproductive isolation among populations of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Evolution. 37: 1294–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & B. L. Garman, 1986. Encounter probabilities between male and female rotifers. J exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 97: 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W., M. J. Childress & B. C. Winkler, 1988. Characteristics of the mate recognition factor in the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 89A: 481–485.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W., 1989. Systematics, reproductive isolation and species boundaries in monogonont rotifers. In C. Ricci, T. W. Snell & C. E. King (eds), Rotifer Symposium V. Developments in Hydrobiology 52. Kluwer Academic Publishers,Dordrecht: 299–310. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia 186/187.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, T. W. & M. A. Nacionales, 1990. Sex pheromone communication in Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera). Comp. Biochem.Physiol. 97A: 211–216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, E., 1984. Contact chemoreception. In: Chemical Ecology of Insects, W. J. &. R. T. C. Bell (eds.), Sunderland,MA, Sinauer Associates, pp. 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchima, M. & M. Murano, 1988. Mating behavior of the marine copepod Oithona davisae. Mar. Biol. 99: 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassarman, P. W., 1987. The biology and chemistry of fertilization.Science 235: 553–560.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watras, C. J., 1983. Mate location by diaptomid copepods. J. Plankton Res. 5: 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, L., 1965. On sexual agglutination and mating type substances (gamones) in isogamous heterophallic Chlamydamondes.I. Evidence of the identity of the gamone with the surface components responsible for sexual flagellar content.J. Phycol. 1: 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, M., 1986. Cell surface antigens. In: Drosophila: SL practical approach, D. B. Roberts (ed.), Washington, DC, IRL Press, pp. 243–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O., 1968. Chemical systems. In: Animal Communication,T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana University Press, pp. 75–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

J. J. Gilbert E. Lubzens M. R. Miracle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Snell, T.W., Morris, P.D. (1993). Sexual communication in copepods and rotifers. In: Gilbert, J.J., Lubzens, E., Miracle, M.R. (eds) Rotifer Symposium VI. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1606-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1606-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4700-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1606-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics