Skip to main content

Cubism, Perspective, Belief1

  • Chapter
Philosophy in Mind

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 60))

  • 449 Accesses

Abstract

Artists and even school children learn the techniques of representing in perspective, of creating representations involving points of view. As such it might seem that, as notions go, the notion of perspective is fairly straightforward; the sort of notion which is capturable within a simple teachable theory. Perspective, its various techniques and theories, can be seen as a relatively late development in the pictorial arts. It can be seen as a development which was eventually displaced from the centrality it had achieved during the Renaissance in the late nineteenth century. And in this frame of mind we can discuss the various techniques for achieving ‘illusions’ of perspective. We might, as ancillary to this discussion, engage in the psychological inquiry of uncovering the processes exploited by these various techniques and we might reasonably hope to achieve some considerable success in our endeavours. An important step towards this goal was taken by Ernst Gombrich [1962]. But there is a frame of mind, which is not so very hard to achieve, in which the notion of perspective is as peculiar and interesting as the mind itself. In this frame of mind the notion of perspective lies within a constellation of notions which together form a prototheory of agency in the world. To be an agent is inter alia but quite centrally to have a perspective on the world. In this frame of mind there is something in the very notion of a perspective which threatens irreducibility of the notion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, H. (1983), Kant’s Transcendental Idealism (Yale Univ. Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnauld, A. ‘Fourth Set of Objections to Descartes’, Meditations’, in CSM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. Introduction à la Métaphysique translated in part in Classics in Logic, ed. D.D. Runes 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürge, T. (1977),‘Belief De Re’, Journal of Philosophy 74:338–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. (1957) ‘Six Great Pictures, 3:‘Las Meninas’by Velázquez’ London Sunday Times June 2nd. Referred to in Gombrich (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1981),‘Where am I?’, Brainstorms, pp.310–323, (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. Meditations on First Philosophy, in Cottingham et al (editors and translators), The Philosophical Writings of Rene Descartes (Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge) (referred to as CSM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1979),‘Reference and contingency’Monist, 52:161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. (1982), Varieties of Reference, (Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frede, M. (1990), ‘Fictions of Truth: Velásquez at the Metropolitan Museum’ Arts Magazine, (April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E. (1961), Art and Illusion (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1969), The Languages of Art, (London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H.L.A. (1949)‘Is there knowledge by acquaintance?’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Vol. XXIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (1969),‘Quantifying In’, in Martinich (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. (1975),‘Dthat’originally published in Syntax and Semantics Vol. 9, ed. P. Cole. Reprinted in Martinich (1985); quote is from p.326 in reprinted version.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.‘Afterthoughts’in Almog and Wettstein edd. Themes from Kaplan (Oxford Univ Press: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. (1980), Naming and Necessity (Blackwell: Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G.W. (1980), New Essays on Human Understanding trans and edd P. Remnant & J. Bennett, (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge) 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinich, A. (1985), Philosophy of Language (Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, J. (1910)‘Note on Painting’ Pan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musil, R. The Man without Qualities, published in three volumes by Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1986), The View from Nowhere (Oxford Univ. Press: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortegay Gasset, J. (1968), The Dehumanization of Art, (Princeton University Press: Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, W. (1989), Picasso and Braque: Pioneering Cubism. (Museum of Modern Art: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1910-11),‘Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description’ Aristotelian Society Proceedings, republished in Russell(1918).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1918), Mysticism and Logic; and other essays (Longmans: Green and Co.; London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, H. (1980), Gottlob Frege (Routledge: London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1978) Descartes: The Project of Pure Inquiry, (Pelican: Hammonsworth)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus trans Pears and McGuinness, (Blackwell: Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. (1984) ed. Frege:Tradition and Influence (Blackwell: Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michael, M. (1994). Cubism, Perspective, Belief1 . In: Michael, M., O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. (eds) Philosophy in Mind. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 60. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1008-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1008-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4438-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1008-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics