Abstract
Artists and even school children learn the techniques of representing in perspective, of creating representations involving points of view. As such it might seem that, as notions go, the notion of perspective is fairly straightforward; the sort of notion which is capturable within a simple teachable theory. Perspective, its various techniques and theories, can be seen as a relatively late development in the pictorial arts. It can be seen as a development which was eventually displaced from the centrality it had achieved during the Renaissance in the late nineteenth century. And in this frame of mind we can discuss the various techniques for achieving ‘illusions’ of perspective. We might, as ancillary to this discussion, engage in the psychological inquiry of uncovering the processes exploited by these various techniques and we might reasonably hope to achieve some considerable success in our endeavours. An important step towards this goal was taken by Ernst Gombrich [1962]. But there is a frame of mind, which is not so very hard to achieve, in which the notion of perspective is as peculiar and interesting as the mind itself. In this frame of mind the notion of perspective lies within a constellation of notions which together form a prototheory of agency in the world. To be an agent is inter alia but quite centrally to have a perspective on the world. In this frame of mind there is something in the very notion of a perspective which threatens irreducibility of the notion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, H. (1983), Kant’s Transcendental Idealism (Yale Univ. Press).
Arnauld, A. ‘Fourth Set of Objections to Descartes’, Meditations’, in CSM.
Bergson, H. Introduction à la Métaphysique translated in part in Classics in Logic, ed. D.D. Runes 1962.
Bürge, T. (1977),‘Belief De Re’, Journal of Philosophy 74:338–362.
Clark, K. (1957) ‘Six Great Pictures, 3:‘Las Meninas’by Velázquez’ London Sunday Times June 2nd. Referred to in Gombrich (1961).
Dennett, D. (1981),‘Where am I?’, Brainstorms, pp.310–323, (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Descartes, R. Meditations on First Philosophy, in Cottingham et al (editors and translators), The Philosophical Writings of Rene Descartes (Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge) (referred to as CSM).
Evans, G. (1979),‘Reference and contingency’Monist, 52:161–168.
Evans, G. (1982), Varieties of Reference, (Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford).
Frede, M. (1990), ‘Fictions of Truth: Velásquez at the Metropolitan Museum’ Arts Magazine, (April).
Gombrich, E. (1961), Art and Illusion (Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press).
Goodman, N. (1969), The Languages of Art, (London).
Hart, H.L.A. (1949)‘Is there knowledge by acquaintance?’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Vol. XXIII.
Kaplan, D. (1969),‘Quantifying In’, in Martinich (1985).
Kaplan, D. (1975),‘Dthat’originally published in Syntax and Semantics Vol. 9, ed. P. Cole. Reprinted in Martinich (1985); quote is from p.326 in reprinted version.
Kaplan, D.‘Afterthoughts’in Almog and Wettstein edd. Themes from Kaplan (Oxford Univ Press: New York).
Kripke, S. (1980), Naming and Necessity (Blackwell: Oxford).
Leibniz, G.W. (1980), New Essays on Human Understanding trans and edd P. Remnant & J. Bennett, (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge) 1981.
Martinich, A. (1985), Philosophy of Language (Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford).
Metzinger, J. (1910)‘Note on Painting’ Pan.
Musil, R. The Man without Qualities, published in three volumes by Picador.
Nagel, T. (1986), The View from Nowhere (Oxford Univ. Press: New York).
Ortegay Gasset, J. (1968), The Dehumanization of Art, (Princeton University Press: Princeton).
Rubin, W. (1989), Picasso and Braque: Pioneering Cubism. (Museum of Modern Art: New York).
Russell, B. (1910-11),‘Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description’ Aristotelian Society Proceedings, republished in Russell(1918).
Russell, B. (1918), Mysticism and Logic; and other essays (Longmans: Green and Co.; London).
Sluga, H. (1980), Gottlob Frege (Routledge: London).
Williams, B. (1978) Descartes: The Project of Pure Inquiry, (Pelican: Hammonsworth)
Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus trans Pears and McGuinness, (Blackwell: Oxford).
Wright, C. (1984) ed. Frege:Tradition and Influence (Blackwell: Oxford).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Michael, M. (1994). Cubism, Perspective, Belief1 . In: Michael, M., O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. (eds) Philosophy in Mind. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 60. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1008-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1008-2_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4438-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1008-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive