Abstract
In the previous chapter we arrived at the conclusion that in spite of many differences of approach there was a certain amount of agreement among linguists with regard to phonemic theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. J. B. N. Reichling, “Het Woord” (Diss.), Nijmegen-Utrecht, 1935, Chapt. 3 (p. 90–148), see p. 95–97.
A. Reichling, “General Linguistics”, p. 21.
E. Sapir, “Language”, New York, 1921, p. 34.
B. Bloch, G. L. Trager: “Linguistic Analysis”, p. 40.
D. Jones: “The Phoneme”, p. 8.
Trubetzkoy: “Grundzüge”, p. 42 ff (“Príncipes”, p. 47 ff).
Ida. C. Ward: “The Phonetics of English”, Cambridge, 1948, p. 144; D. Jones: “Outline”, p. 180.
Passy: “Petite phonétique comparée”, Leipzig 1912, p. 4 and p. 123; mentioned by Jones: “The Phoneme”, p. 197 (‘prononciation familière ralentie’).
R. H. Stetson: “Bases of Phonology”, Oberlin Gollege, 1945, p. 102.
K. L. Pike: “Phonemics”, p. 142; see also Ida. C. Ward: “Phonetics”, p. 46.
F. Hintze: “Zur Frage der monophonematischen Wertung”, Studia Linguistica, IV, Fase. 1, 1950, p. 14–24.
A. Martinet: “Occlusives and Affricates with Reference to some Problems of Romance PhonologyWord”, Vol. 5, 1949, p. 116–122, see p. 116.
G. L. Trager & B. Bloch: “The Syllabic Phonemes of EnglishLanguage” 17, 1941, p. 223–246, see p. 223.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cohen, A. (1971). Problems Connected with Phonemic Analysis. In: The Phonemes of English. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2969-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2969-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0639-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2969-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive