Skip to main content

Abstract

Although a great amount of valuable work has been done in the field of phonemics with regard to hitherto unrecorded languages, one may well wonder whether the accent has not been placed too predominantly on these at the expense of the so-called culture languages, i.e. “the, language of a society that has a literary tradition in written form”, to use Gordon M. Messing’s phrase in “Structuralism and Literary Tradition1) In the same article the author sets out to show up the fallacy of the assumption that the same criteria in describing languages of the one category can be applied to a description of a culture language. As an illustration of this confusion Messing points to Robert A. Hall’s treatment of Modern French as if it were Eskimo.2)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gordon M. Messing: “Structuralism and Literary Tradition” Language 27, 1951, p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Robert A. Hall Jr.: “French”, Structual Sketch I, Lang. Monographs, 24, Baltimore, 1948; see “Structuralism”, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Vachek: “Über die phonologische Interpretation der Diphthonge mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Engtischen”, Studies in English, IV, Prague, 1933, p. 87–170.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Trnka: “A Phonological Analysis of Present-Day Standard English”, Studies in English, V, Prague, 1935; also “Some Remarks on the Phonological Structure of English”, Xenia Pragensia, 1929, p. 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.J. Uldall: “On the Structural Interpretation of Diphthongs”, Proceedings 2; p. 272–276.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. Funke: “Versuch eines Aufrisses einer Strukturlehre des modernen Englisch”, Wege und Ziele, Bern, 1945, p. 122–156.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Kruisinga: “The Phonetic Structure of English Words”, Bibliotheca Anglicana, Vol. 2, Bern, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. de Saussure: “Cours de linguistique générale” 4me ed. Paris, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. F. Twaddell: “On Defining the Phoneme Language Monographs”, 16, Baltimore, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Sapir: “The Sound Patterns of Language” Lang. Vol. 1, 1925, p. 37–51. ib. p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Hjelmslev: “On the principles of phonematics” Proceedings 2, 1936, p. 49–54, see p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kenneth L. Pike: “Phonemics Ann Arbor”, 1947, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Reichling, “What is General Linguistics?”, Lingua, I, 1947, p. 8–24, see p. 22 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. Charles F. Hockett, Review of “Recherches StructuralesInt”. Journal of Am. Ling. Vol. 18, No. 2, April, 1952, p. 86–99, see p. 98a.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cohen, A. (1971). Introduction. In: The Phonemes of English. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2969-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2969-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-0639-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2969-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics