Abstract
Partee has effectively shown in her paper that formal analysis of semantical notions and problems can be of great interest to linguists. The contributions of logicians in the field of semantics, as Hintikka pointed out, have not yet been fully noted and utilized by linguists in their studies of semantics of natural languages. Though we are not quite clear about what exact factors prompt linguists of recent times to devote more attention to the studies of semantics, we can with confidence say that this new development of linguistic studies would be impossible without a positive realization of the relevance of semantic analysis for synthetical and grammatical theorizing. Perhaps it is increasingly recognized by both linguists and logicians that syntax and semantics of a language can be only relatively separated and distinguished, but not absolutely bifurcated and abstracted from each other. For it seems clear that every semantic distinction can be given a synthetic marking in a language system and every synthetic form can be given a semantic interpretation, be it direct or indirect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, CY. (1973). Comments on Professor Partee’s Paper. In: Hintikka, K.J.J., Moravcsik, J.M.E., Suppes, P. (eds) Approaches to Natural Language. Synthese Library, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2506-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2506-5_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0233-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2506-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive