Abstract
There is perhaps no great philosopher who presents us, with as much confidence and assurance as Spinoza does, with what have appeared to many commentators, and must appear at first sight to most students, as stark contradictions. Yet they are all deduced with rigorous logic from first principles that Spinoza lays down as indubitable and which a critic would be hard put to controvert with any degree of plausibility. One’s first reaction on confronting these apparent conflicts is the conviction that something has gone wrong at some obscure point in the course of the reasoning, but closer examination and more careful consideration of Spinoza’s system and his explicit statements will, I believe, show that he remains consistent throughout, at least in most important respects, and that the conflicts in his doctrine are apparent only.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cf. J. N. Findlay, “Can God’s Existence be Disproved,” in New Essays in Philosophical Theology, Ed. Anthony Flew (London, 1955).
Cf. J. J. C. Smart, “The Existence of God” in op. cit, p. 40; and my Hypothesis and Perception, (London, 1970 ), p. 340.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harris, E.E. (1973). The Absurdity of Atheism. In: Salvation from Despair. Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idees International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 59. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2495-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2495-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2497-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2495-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive