Abstract
The prevalent mood of contemporary mankind is one of despair, for never before have the prospects of civilization seemed gloomier or the situation of mankind more helpless. The extinction of the race within the foreseeable future seems threatened from every quarter, whether by the exhaustion of the resources of the earth, or by the pollution of the sea and its life-giving waters, or by the destruction of the ecological systems in which living species cooperate to maintain themselves and one another. All these deleterious processes seem to be happening at an accelerating pace without any deliberate action on the part of man and despite such feeble efforts as he has yet made or seems likely to make to stem the tide of deterioration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Essays in the Philosophy of History (Ed. William Debbins, Texas University Press, Austin, 1965), p. 4.
Cf. K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London, 1959; New York, 1961); N. R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge, 1958); T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962); I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge, 1970); and my Hypothesis and Perception (London, 1970 ).
Cf. K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London, 1959; New York, 1961); N. R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge, 1958); T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962); I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge, 1970); and my Hypothesis and Perception (London, 1970 ).
Cf. K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London, 1959; New York, 1961); N. R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge, 1958); T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962); I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge, 1970); and my Hypothesis and Perception (London, 1970 ).
Cf. K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London, 1959; New York, 1961); N. R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge, 1958); T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962); I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge, 1970); and my Hypothesis and Perception (London, 1970 ).
Cf. K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London, 1959; New York, 1961); N. R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge, 1958); T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962); I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge, 1970); and my Hypothesis and Perception (London, 1970).
Cf. H. Horkheimer’s discussion in The Eclipse of Reason (O.U.P., 1947).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harris, E.E. (1973). Contemporary Despair and its Antidote. In: Salvation from Despair. Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idees International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 59. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2495-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2495-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-2497-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2495-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive