Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiple Discourse Connectives in a Lexicalized Grammar For Discourse

  • Chapter
Computing Meaning

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 77))

Abstract

Lexicalized grammars1 such as TAG (Joshi, 1987; XTAG-Group, 1998) and CCG (Steedman, 1996) have been very successful in showing how clauselevel syntax and semantics project from the lexicon. What drives the current enterprise is the hypothesis that the same can be shown true, at some level, for discourse syntax and semantics. Here we demonstrate our initial effort to

  • — extend a lexicalized grammar (LTAG) to discourse;

  • — use the same compositional semantics on syntactic structure that is used in lexicalized grammars (Steedman, 1996; Stone and Doran, 1997; Stone and Webber, 1998; Joshi and Vijay-Shanker, 1999);

  • — extend to discourse connectives the idea that the meaning of a lexical element can involve an anaphoric link to the previous discourse;

  • — exploit similar inference mechanisms for defeasible aspects of both sentence-level and discourse semantics.

This chapter is based on the paper that originally appeared in the Proceedings of IWCS-3 (Webber et al., 1999a); it has been updated in light of simplications that have been realised throught further work (Webber et al., 1999b; Webber et al., 1999c; Webber et al., 2000).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cohen, R. (1987) Analyzing the Structure of Argumentative Discourse. Computational Linguistics 13(1-2), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristea, D. and B. Webber (1997) Expectations in Incremental Discourse Processing. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL97/EACL97). Madrid, Spain, 88–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Danlos, L. (1998) G-TAG: un formalisme lexicalisé pour la génération de textes inspiré de TAG. Traitement Automatique des Langues —; T.A.L 39(2). Available in English translation as ‘G-TAG: a Formalism for Text Generation inspired by Tree Adjoining Grammar’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degand, L. (1998) On Classifying Connectives and Coherence Relations. In: Coling/ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers. Montreal, Canada, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, B. (1998) Representing Temporal Discourse Markers for Generation Purposes. In: Coling/ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers. Montreal, Canada, 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, B., N. Lenke, and M. Stede (1997) Ma(r)king concessions in English and German. Discourse Processes 24(1), 87–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. (1985) Ontological Promiscuity. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Palo Alto, CA, 61–69, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J., M. Stickel, P. Martin, and D. Edwards (1993) Interpretation as Abduction. Artificial Intelligence 69–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayez, J. and C. Rossari (1998a) Pragmatic Connectives as Predicates. In: P. Saint-Dizier (ed.): Predicative Structures in Natural Language and Lexical Knowledge Bases. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, 306–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayez, J. and C. Rossari (1998b) The Semantics of Pragmatic Connectives in TAG: The French donc example. In: A. Abeillé and O. Rambow (eds.): Proceedings of the TAG+4 Conference. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. (1987) An Introduction to Tree Adjoining Grammar. In: A. Manaster-Ramer (ed.): Mathematics of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. and K. Vijay-Shanker (1999) Compositional Semantics with Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar (LTAG): How much underspecification is necessary?. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computational Semantics. Tilburg, Netherlands. Revised version appears in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, A. (1996) A Data-driven Methodology for Motivating a Set of Coherence Relations. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, A. and C. Mellish (1996) A Feature-based Account of the Relations Signalled by Sentence and Clause Connectives. Language and Speech 39(2-3), 143–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, A., J. Oberlander, M. O’Donnell, and C. Mellish (in press) Beyond Elaboration: The interaction of relations and focus in coherent text. In: T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, and W. Spooren (eds.): Text Representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerwerf, L. (1998) Causal Connectives have Presuppositions. The Hague, The Netherlands: Holland Academic Graphics. PhD Thesis, Catholic University of Brabant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1971a) If’s, and’s and but’s about conjunction. In: C. Fillmore and T. Langendoen (eds.): Studies in Linguistic Semantics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 114–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R. (1971b) The role of deduction in grammar. In: C. Fillmore and T. Langedoen (eds.): Studies in Linguistic Semantics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lascarides, A. and N. Asher (1993) Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(5), 437–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W. and S. Thompson (1988) Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization. Text 8(3), 243–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moens, M. and M. Steedman (1988) Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. and M. Pollack (1992) A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis. Computational Linguistics 18(4), 537–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, R., C. Doran, and D. Scott (1999) Generating Embedded Discourse Markers from Rhetorical Structure. In: Proceedings of the Seventh European Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Toulouse, France, 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, T. (1997) Semantic and Pragmatic Sources of Coherence. Discourse Processes 24, 119–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scha, R. and L. Polanyi (1988) An Augmented Context Free Grammar for Discourse. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING′88). Budapest, Hungary, 573–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, second edition.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M. (1996) Surface Structure and Interpretation. Cambridge MA: Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 30, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. (1998) Logical Modularity for Disjunctive Logic Programs. Submitted to LICS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. and C. Doran (1997) Sentence Planning as Description Using Tree Adjoining Grammar. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL97/EACL97). Madrid, Spain, 198–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. and B. Webber (1998) Textual Economy through Closely Coupled Syntax and Semantics. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Niagara-on-the-Lake, Canada, 178–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eijck J. and H. Kamp (1997) Representing Discourse in Context. In: J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.): Handbook of Logic and Language. Elsevier Science B.V. 181–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, B. and A. Joshi (1998) Anchoring a Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar for Discourse. In: Coling/ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers. Montreal, Canada, 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, B., A. Joshi, and A. Knott (November 2000) The Anaphoric Nature of certain Discourse Connectives. In: Semantics: from Lexeme to Discourse. Groningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, B., A. Knott, and A. Joshi (1999a) Multiple Discourse Connectives in a Lexicalized Grammar for Discourse. In: Third International Workshop on Computational Semantics. Tilburg, The Netherlands, 309–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, B., A. Knott, M. Stone, and A. Joshi (1999b) Discourse Relations: A Structural and Presuppositional Account using Lexicalised TAG. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. College Park MD, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, B., A. Knott, M. Stone, and A. Joshi (1999c) What are Little Trees Made of: A Structural and Presuppositional Account using Lexicalised TAG. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Levels of Representation in Discourse (LORID′99). Edinburgh, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, J. (1993) Issues in Linguistic Segmentation. In: Workshop on Intentionality and Structure in Discourse Relations, Association for Computational Linguistics. Ohio StateUniversity, 148–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • XTAG-Group, T. (1998) A Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for English. Technical Report IRCS 98-18, University of Pennsylvania. See ftp://ftp.cis.upenn.edu/pub/ircs/98-18.

Download references

Authors
  1. Bonnie Webber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alistair Knott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aravind Joshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tilburg University, The Netherlands

    Harry Bunt , Reinhard Muskens  & Elias Thijsse ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Webber, B., Knott, A., Joshi, A. (2001). Multiple Discourse Connectives in a Lexicalized Grammar For Discourse. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R., Thijsse, E. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 77. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0572-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0572-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0451-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0572-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation