Abstract
Georg Simmel, sociologist of the edgy, feverish, metropolitan lifestyle, philosopher of modernity, money, and fragmentation, has a decidedly classical background. Consider him not merely a man of his own times, fruit of late 19th-century culture and sociology, but a man who each day reads Kant’s philosophy and Goethe’s poetic and naturalist works, garnering sustenance for his daily reflection. Apart from the particular style of his learning and the results of his research, the interest in and passion for the “classical” period of late 18th-century German culture plays a decisive role in his philosophy. Simmel dedicated several monographs to Kant and to Goethe, the Berlin lectures on Kant in 1904, the important monograph on Goethe in 1913, as well as comparative studies such as Kant und Goethe in 1906 and numerous articles published in periodicals and newspapers upon various aspects of the culture and social lifestyle of his times, springing from his nonacademic reading of their works.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
On the scant success of his nature studies see J.W. Goethe, Schicksal der Handschrift, in Werke E. Trunz (ed.), (Munich: Beck, Hamburger Ausgabe, 1982), Vol. 13, pp. 102–105.
On the importance of Kant in Simmel’s philosophy see K.C. Köhnke, Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neukantismus (Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp, 1986), and idem, “Il giovane Simmel tra positivismo e neokantismo,” Rassegna Italiana di sociologia 2 (1992), pp. 215-232.
On Goethe’s morphological method see D. Kuhn, Empirische und ideelle Wirklichkeit (Graz, Vienna, Koln: Böhlaus, 1965); M. Kleinschnieder, Goethes Naturstudien (Bonn: Bouvier, 1971); F. Amrine, F. Zucker, A. Wheeler (eds.), Goethe and the Sciences, A Reappraisal (Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster, Tokyo Reidel: 1987); P. Giacomoni, Le forme e il vivente. Morfologia e filosofia della natura in J.W. Goethe (Naples: Guida, 1993); and G. Giorello and A. Grieco (eds), Goethe scienziato (Turin: Einaudi, 1998)
See V.H. Bräuning-Oktavio, “Vom Zwischenkieferknochen zur Idee des Typus. Goethe als Naturforscher in den Jahren 1780–1786”, Nova Acta Leopoldina 18 (1956); M. Wenzel, “Dergescheiterte Dilettant. Goethe, Sömmerring und das ‘os. intermascillare’ beim Menschen”, in Sömmerring Forschungen,’ Vol. III (Stuttgart, New York: G. Fischer: (1988), F. Moiso, “La scoperta dell’osso intermascellare e la questione del tipo osteologico,” in Goethe scienziato, op. cit. pp. 298-337.
J.W. Goethe, “Dem Menschen wie den Tieren ist ein Zwischenknochen der oberen Kinnlade zuzuschreiben”, in Werke, op. cit, Vol. 13, pp. 184–196.
J.W. Goethe, Werke, op. cit, Vol. 13, pp. 170–186.
op. cit Ibidem, Vol. 13, pp. 176–77.
op. cit Ibidem, Vol. 13, p. 176.
op. cit Ibidem, Vol. 13, p. 179.
Zur Farbenlehre. Didaktischer Teil, Ibidem, Vol. 13, p. 316.
Goethe, Werke, op. cit, Vol. 10, p. 314.
I. Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft, in Gesammelte Schriften, Akademie Ausgabe (Berlin: G. Reimer, 1910). Vol. IV, pp. 496 ff.
As regards Romantic Naturphilosophie, see: Romanticism and the Sciences, A. Cunningham and N. Jardine (eds.), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990); Romanticism in Science, S. Poggi and M. Bossi (eds.), (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994); AAVV “Scienza, filosofia della natura e romanticismo tedesco,” Annali:sezione germanica. Studi tedeschi (Naples: 1995)
G. Simmel, Das Wesen der Materie (Berlin: Norddeutsche Buchdruckerei, 1881), p. 19.
G. Simmel, Gesamtausgabe, O. Rammstedt (ed.), (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1989), Vol. II, p. 129.
G. Simmel, “The Problem of Sociology,” in Georg Simmel 1858-1918. A Collection of Essays, K. Wolff (ed.), (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1959), p. 314.
Ibidem, pp. 319-320.
As regards the relationship between Simmel and Weber and the sociology of that period, see Georg Simmel und die frühen Soziologen, O. Rammstedt (ed.), (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1989).
On this issue, see H.J. Dahme, Soziologie als exakte Wissenschaft. Georg Simmel Ansatz und seine Bedeutung in der gegenwärtigen Soziologie (Stuttgart: Enke 1981), pp. 465 ff. Also see F. Tenbruck, “Georg Simmel”, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 10 (1958), pp. 603 ff; F. Fellmann, Lebensphilosophie. Elemente einer Theorie der Selbsterfahrung (Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rohwolt, 1993); A. Dal Lago, Il conflitto della modernità. Il pensiero di Georg Simmel (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1994); and finally, my work, P. Giacomoni, Classicità e frammento. Georg Simmel goethiano (Naples: Guida, 1995).
See D. Frisby, Georg Simmel (London: Tavistock, 1984), pp. 64 ff.
For further information on this issue, see D.N. Levine, E.B. Carter, E.M. Gorman, “Simmel’s Influence on American Sociology,” in H. Böhringer, K. Gründer (eds.), Aesthetik und Soziologie um die Jahrhundertwende: Georg Simmel (Frankurt a.M.: Klostermann, 1976), pp. 175–228.
See H. Böhringer’s essay on this topic, “Spuren von spekulativem Atomismus in Simmels formaler Soziologie,” in Aesthetik und Soziologie um die Jahrhundertwende: Georg Simmel, op. cit., pp. 105–114; and Dal Lago, Il conflitto della modernità, op. cit., pp. 43-86.
See Tenbruck, G. Simmel, op. cit. pp. 604 ff.; on this topic also see K.P. Biesenbach, Subjektivität ohne Substanz (Frankfurt a.M., Bern, New York Lang: 1988).
G. Simmel, Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung, O. Rammstedt (ed.), (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1992), p. 262.
G. Simmel, Philosophie des Geldes, in Gesamtausgabe, op. cit., Vol. VI.
G. Simmel, “Der Fremde,” in Das Individuelle Gesetz, M. Landmann (ed.), (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1969), pp. 63–70.
On these topics see B. Nedelmann, “Ambivalence as a Principle of Socialisation,” Rassegna italiana di sociologia 33 (1992), pp. 233–256 and idem., “Georg Simmel. Emotion und Wechselwirkung in intimen Gruppen,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, (Sonderheft, 1983), pp. 179-209.
G. Simmel, Philosophie der Kunst, Gertrud Simmel (ed.), (Potsdam: Kiepenheuer 1992), p. 41.
Ibidem, p. 43.
G. Simmel, “Bruchstücke einer Psychologie der Frau” (1904), in Schriften zur Philosophie und Soziologie der Geschlechter, H.J. Dahme, K.C. Köhnke (eds.) (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1985), p. 177.
K.C. Köhnke (eds.) (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1985) Ibidem, p. 169.
K.C. Köhnke (eds.) (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1985) Ibidem, p. 221.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giacomoni, P. (2002). Georg Simmel Between Goethe and Kant on “Life” and “Force”. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Life Energies, Forces and the Shaping of Life: Vital, Existential. Analecta Husserliana, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0417-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0417-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3914-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0417-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive