Skip to main content

Inadequacies in the Decision Analysis Model of Rationality

  • Chapter
Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory

Part of the book series: The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 13a))

  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

This paper argues that for various behavioral and ethical reasons decision analysis does not, and in some cases, cannot, treat all the considerations that enter a human decision. Those considerations that cannot be treated are holistic in nature, and do not allow the decomposition (‘divide and conquer’)([5] p. 271) which makes decision analysis, and in fact all formal analysis, possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Bibliography

  1. Arrow, K. J., Essays in the Theory of Risk-bearing, Markham Publishing Co., Chicago, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berliner, H., ‘Computer Chess’, SIGART Newsletter, ACM, No. 55, page 14, December, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hearst, E., ‘Psychology Across the Chessboard’, Psychology Today, June, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marschak, J., ‘Rational Behavior, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility’, Econometrica 18, 2, 111––141, April, 1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Raiffa, H., Decision Analysis, Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1944.

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography of Relevant Works by the Author

  • Bellman, R., and Dreyfus, S., Applied Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H., What Computers Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason, Harper and Row, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. and Haugeland, J., ‘The Computer as a Mistaken Model of the Mind’, in S. C. Brown (ed.), Philosophy and Psychology, Macmillan, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H., ‘Review of Recent Work in Artificial Intelligence’, Creative Computing, March-April, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, S. and Law, A., The Art and Theory of Dynamic Programming, Academic Press, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E. (1978). Inadequacies in the Decision Analysis Model of Rationality. In: Hooker, C.A., Leach, J.J., >McClennen, E.F. (eds) Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory. The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 13a. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9789-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9789-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9791-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9789-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics