Abstract
Despite the impressive reception that structuralism has enjoyed so far, the fact remains that few “structuralist” thinkers rest easy with the name and fewer still venture more than an exemplarist account of their own innovative methods. Nonetheless, most writers who persist in using the name usually do acknowledge some degree of indebtedness to structural linguistics: specifically, to Saussure and the ensuing tradition. In the case of Lévi-Strauss’ structuralism (perhaps the most “orthodox” variety), this debt is most apparent when he insists on maintaining the strict distinction between synchronic and diachronic analysis. But if this initial distinction is one of the most important for Saussure, it ultimately proves to be one of the most disconcerting doctrines for Lévi-Strauss—disconcerting because, in fact, it is never respected. Even while he argues repeatedly and forcefully for the distinction between synchronic and diachronic analysis, Lévi-Strauss systematically suppresses the diachronic axis. That such a suppression does take place, and that this can be strictly demonstrated across his various texts, will be our present concern.1 Moreover, this procedure indicates a great deal about the metaphysical tenor of structuralism as such.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C Lévi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology, trans. Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (New York: Basic Books, 1963).
Ibid.., p. 69.
Ibid.., p. 21.
Cf. also, C. Lévi-Strauss, Totemism, trans. Rodney Needham (Boston: Beacon Press, 1963), p. 71: “Both language and culture are the products of activities which are basically similar. I am now referring… to the human mind.”
Totemism, p. 91.
S.A., p. 281.
Ibid., p. 280.
Ibid., p. 280.
Ibid., p. 283.
Ibid., p. 289.
Ibid., p. 289.
C. Lévi-Strauss, The Savage Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966), p. 230.
S.M., pp. 230–231.
S.M., p. 231.
Ibid., p. 231
Ibid., p. 67.
Ibid., p. 20.
Ibid., p. 232.
Ibid., p. 231.
Ibid., p. 234.
Ibid., p. 231.
Ibid., p. 263.
Ibid., p. 66.
Totemism, p. 27.
S.A., p. 233.
Totemism, p. 29.
P. Ricœur, La metaphor vive (Paris: Éd. du Seuil, 1975).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allison, D. (1978). Structuralism Revisited: Lévi-Strauss and Diachrony. In: Bruzina, R., Wilshire, B. (eds) Crosscurrents in Phenomenology. Selected Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9698-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9698-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2044-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9698-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive