Abstract
Gauge theories have been formulated in 1954 by Yang and Mills [1] as natural non abelian generalizations of Maxwell’s theory of the electromagnetic field. Since the electromagnetic field mediates electromagnetic interactions between charged svstems it was natural to seek for the non abelian analog susceptible to accomodate the non abelian internal symmetries discovered in the realm of elementary particle physics. The naturalness of this construction seems also to have drawn the attention of other physicists who were simultaneously aware of a number of difficulties which remain unsolved even now. As time went, more approximate internal symmetries [2] were discovered in particle physics. Also, a number of fundamental remarks of a technical nature [3] allowed to put gauge theories to practical use. There resulted a net progress in unifying “weak”, “electromagnetic”, [4][5], and “strong” interactions [5] between elementary particles, to such an extent that at present, it has become standard to think about particle physics in terms of gauge theories [6]. The naturalness of these theories has also appeared in mathematics where it constitutes a branch of differential geometry: the study of fiber bundles and connections on them [7], associated with a Lie group G-[4][5][8].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C.N. Yang, R.L. Mills, P.R. 96,191(1954).
Nuclear and subnuclear physics exhibit a hierarchy of approximate symmetries: isotopic spin SU(2)s strangeness SU3, charm SU4, nowadays referred to as “flavour” groups. It has turned out however that these are not the groups relevant to modern gauge theories [4][5][8].
P. Higgs, P.L. 12, 132 (1964);
TWB Kibble, P.R. 155, 1554 (1967).
L.D. Faddeev, V.N. Popov, P.L. 25B, 29 (1967).
G. ’t Hooft, P.R. D14, 3432 (1976).
G. ’t Hooft, N.P. B33, 173 (1971);
G. ’t Hooft, N.P. B35, 167 (1971).
G. ’t Hooft, M. Veltman, N.P. B50, 318 (1972).
C.G. Callan, R.F. Dashen, D.J. Gross, P.R. D19, 1826 (1979).
S. Weinberg, P.R.L. 19, 1264 (1967).
H. Fritsch, M. Gell-Mann, H. Leutwyler, P.L. 47B, 365(1973),
S. Weinberg, P.R.L. 31, 494 (1973).
Further efforts are currently being pursued to unify strong electromagnetic and weak interactions. One favoured approach consists in having colour SU3xflavour SU2xU(l) as a subgroup of a larger gauge group e.g. SU5:
H. Georgi, S.L. Glashow, P.R.L. 32, 438 (1974).
S. Kobayashi, K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, Interscience, New York, 1963 ).
In present day particle physics, G is “colour SU3” of strong interactions X “flavour” SU2LxU(l) of weak and electromagnetic interactions.
J.H. Lowenstein, B. Schroer, P.R. D6, 1556 (1972).
B. Simon: The P(Φ)2 Euclidean quantum field theory Princeton University Press, Princeton (1974).
See however the qualitative discussion of static quark confinement in quantum chromo dynamics (QCD): G.’ t Hooft, N.P. B153, 141 (1979).
A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, A.S. Schwarz, Y. Tyupkin, P.L.B59, 517 (1976).
G. ’t Hooft, Unpublished
R. Jackiw, C. Rebbi, P.R. D14, 517 (1976).
A.S. Schwarz, P.L. B67, 172 (1977).
R. Jackiw, C. Rebbi, P.R.L. B67, 189 (1977).
M.F. Atiyah, N.J. Hitchin, I.M. Singer, Proc. Nat. Ac. Sci.USA 74, 2662 (1977).
M.F. Atiyah, N.J. Hitchin, I.M. Singer, Proc. R. Soc.London, A362, 425 (1978). A.S. Schwarz, C.M.P., 64, 233 (1979).
R. Penrose, Rep. Math. Phys., 12, 65 (1977).
R.S. Ward, P.L. 61A, 81 (1977).
M.F. Atiyah, R.S. Ward, C.M.P., 55, 117 (1977).
M.F. Atiyah, V.G. Drinfeld, W.J. Hitchin, Yu I Manin, P.L.65A, 185 (1978).
V.G. Drinfeld, Yu I Manin, Funct. An. Appl. (in russian),(1979); C.M.P., 63, 177 (1978).
M.F. Atiyah, Lectures given at the Scuola Normale Superiore,Pisa, 1978, to appear.
A. Dovady, J.L. Verdier, ed. E.N.S. Seminar (1978), to appear in Astérisque.
J. Eells, L. Lemaire, Bull. London Math. Soc.10, 1 (1978).
W.D. Garber, S.N.M. Ruijseaars, E. Seiler, D. Burns, Ann.Phys. 119 305 (1979).
A. Perelomov, C.M.P., 63, 237 (1978).
F. Gursey, H.C. Tzé, Yale preprint Oct. (1979).
A.M. Din, W.J. Zakrzewski, CERN preprint TH 2721–2722.
R. Balian, G. Parisi, A. Voros, P.R.L. 41, 1141 (1978).
H.J. Borchers, W.D. Garber, C.M.P., to appear.
B. V.A. Fateev, I.V. Frolov, A.S. Schwarz, N.P. B154, 1 (1979). Berg, M. Liischer, C.M.P., to appear.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stora, R. (1980). Yang-Mills Fields: Semi Classical Aspects. In: Bardos, C., Bessis, D. (eds) Bifurcation Phenomena in Mathematical Physics and Related Topics. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9004-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9004-3_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9006-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9004-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive