Abstract
Recent economic applications of optimal inventory control models to aggregate industry data (Hay and Holt 1975, Belsley 1969, Sengupta and Sfeir 1979) have been restricted to Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) models and the associated linear decision rules (LDR). For perfect markets with competitive exchange of information, where no individual agent has the monopolistic power to influence the price or the market demand, the LQG model may hold very well as an approximation; this is unlikely to be so for imperfect markets, where imperfection may be due to several sources, e.g., (a) asymmetry in the distribution of market demand, where the third and fourth moments may be as important as the mean and variance, (b) the price may be useable in part as a control variable along with output, (c) the inventory cost function may be partly convex and partly concave and (d) the sensitivity to risk parameters in stochastic demand may modify the LDR and its updating characteristics. Our object here is to formulate in a simplified framework a set of dynamic inventory control models, which incorporates in an approximate sense some of the imperfections of stochastic markets as above. These models are illustrative of the deficiencies of the LDR approach, as they suggest the need for stochastic demand conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barro, R.J., “Theory of monopolistic price adjustment,” Review of Economic Studies, 39, (1972) 17–26.
Belsley, D.A., Inventory Production Behavior: The Order Stock Distinction. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1969.
Fanchon, P.F., Inventory Control in Imperfect Markets. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Santa Barbara: University of California, 1982.
Harsanyi, J.C., “Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players,” Management sci., 14, (1976), 159–171.
Hay, G.A., and Holt, C.C., “A general solution for linear decision rules,” Econometrica, 43, (1975), 231–260.
Hempenius, A.L., Monopoly with Random Demand. Rotterdam: University Press, 1970.
Kirman, A.P., “Learning by firms about demand conditions,” in Adaptive Economic Models, ed. R.H. Day and T. Groves, New York: Academic Press, 1975.
Mills, E.S., Price Output and Inventory Policy. New York: John Wiley, 1962.
Sengupta, J.K., “Simulation of linear decision rules,” International J. of Systems Science, 8 (1977) 1269–1280.
Sengupta, J.K., “Noncooperative equilibria in monopolistic competition under uncertainty,” Zeitschrift fur Nationalokonomie 38 (1978), 193–208.
Sengupta, J.K., Decision Models in Stochastic Programming. New York: Elsevier-North Holland, 1982a.
Sengupta, J.K., “A minimax policy for optimal portfolio choice,” Int. J. of Systems, Science, 13 (1982b), 39–56.
Sengupta, J.K, “Static monopoly under uncertainty,” Working paper No. 204, UC Santa Barbara, 1982c.
Sengupta, J.K. and Sfeir, R.E., “The adjustment of output-inventory process under linear decision rules”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1 (1979), 361–381.
Tintner, G. and Sengupta J.K., Stochastic Economics. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sengupta, J.K. (1985). Optimal output inventory decisions in stochastic markets. In: Information and Efficiency in Economic Decision. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5053-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5053-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8737-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5053-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive