Abstract
The aim of the cognitive study of science is to develop a cognitive theory of science. But what is meant by a ‘theory’ of science? And why do I call it ‘cognitive’?1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Barnes, Barry (1974), Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
Barnes, Barry and David Edge, eds. (1982), Science in Context. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
Barnes, Barry and David Bloor. (1982), ‘Relativitism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge’. In M. Hollis and S. Lukes, eds., Rationality and Relativism. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 21–47).
Bartlett, F.C. (1932), Remembering. (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press).
Bloor, David (1976), Knowledge and Social Imagery. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
Boyd, R. (1981), ‘Scientific Realism and Naturalistic Epistemology’. In P. D. Asquith and R. N. Giere, eds. PSA 1980, Vol. 2. (East Lansing, MI: The Philosophy of Science Association).
Bradie, M. (1986), ‘Assessing Evolutionary Epistemologies’. Biology and Philosophy, 1.
Campbell, D.T. (1959), ‘Methodological Suggestions from a Comparative Psychology of Knowledge Processes’. Inquiry, 2, 152–82.
Campbell, D.T. (1960), ‘Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes’. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.
Campbell, D.T. (1966), ‘Pattern Matching as Essential in Distal Knowing’. In The Psychology of Egon Brunswick, K.R. Hammond, ed. (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston) 81–106.
Campbell, D.T. (1974), ‘Evolutionary Epistemology’. In P. A. Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of Karl Popper. (La Salle: Open Court) 413–463.
Churchland, P.M. (1979), Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Churchland, P.M. and C.A. Hooker. (1985), Images of Science. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Collins, H.M. and T.J. Pinch. (1982), Frames of Meaning. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
DeMey, Marc (1982), The Cognitive Paradigm. (Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel).
Edge, David and Michael Mulkay. (1976), Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain. (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
Faust, David (1984), The Limits of Scientific Reasoning. (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
Gamow, G. (1947), One, Two, Three... Infinity. (New York: The Viking Press).
Gardner, Howard (1985), The Mind’s New Science. (New York: Basic Books).
Goodman, N. (1972), Problems and Projects. (Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Co.).
Gruber, H.E., and P.H. Barrett. (1974), Darwin on Man. (New York: Dutton).
Gruber, H. and J.J. Voneche, eds. (1977), The Essential Piaget. (New York: Basic Books).
Habermas, Jürgen (1971), Knowledge and Human Interests. (Boston: Beacon Press).
Haugeland, John, ed. (1981), Mind Design. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
Hollis, M. and S. Lukes, eds. (1982), Rationality and Relativism. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
Hooker, C.A. (1978), ‘An Evolutionary Naturalist Realist Doctrine of Perception and Secondary Qualities’. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 9. C. Wade Savage, ed. (Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press).
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983), Mental Models. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (Cambridge University Press).
Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge. (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
Knorr-Cetina, K.D. and Michael Mulkay, eds. (1983), Science Observed. (Hollywood, CA: Sage Publications).
Kornblith, H., ed. (1985), Naturalizing Epistemology. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
Kuhn, T.S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd ed., 1970).
Kuhn, T.S. (1974), ‘Second Thoughts on Paradigms’. In The Structure of Scientific Theories. F. Suppe, ed. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 459–82).
Lakatos, I. (1970), ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar. (1979), Laboratory Life. (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).
Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems. (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Laudan, L. (1984), ‘Explaining the Success of Science: Beyond Epistemic Realism and Relativism.’ In Science and Reality. J. T. Cushing, C. F. Delaney, and Gary M. Gutting, eds. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).
Laudan, L. et al. (1986), ‘Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research’. Synthese 69, 141–223.
Leplin, J. ed. (1984), Scientific Realism. (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Lumsden, C and E.O. Wilson. (1981), Genes, Mind, and Culture. (Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press).
McCarthy, Thomas (1978), The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. (Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press).
Minski, M. (1975), ‘A Framework for Representing Knowledge’. In P. H. Winston, ed., The Psychology of Computer Vision. (New York: McGraw-Hill) 211–277.
Neisser, U. (1976), Cognition and Reality. (New York: W. H. Freeman).
Newton-Smith, W.H. (1981), The Rationality of Science. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
Nisbett, R. and L. Ross. (1980), Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
Pickering, A. (1984), Constructing Quarks. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
Plotkin, H.C. ed. (1982), Learning, Development, and Culture. (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
Pylyshyn, Z. (1984), Computation and Cognition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
Putnam, H. (1982), ‘Why Reason Cаn’t be Naturalized’. Synthese 52, 3–23.
Rensch, B. (1971), Biophilosophy. (New York: Columbia University Press).
Rorty, R. (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Rubinstein, Robert A., Charles D. Laughlin, Jr., and John McManus. (1984), Science as a Cognitive Process. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).
Ruse, M. (1986), Taking Darwin Seriously (Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel).
Shapin, Steven (1982), ‘History of Science and its Sociological Reconstructions’. History of Science XX, 157–211.
Siegel, H. (1980), ‘Justification, Discovery and the Naturalizing of Epistemology’. Philosophy of Science 47, 297–321.
Siegel, H. (1985), ‘What is the Question Concerning the Rationality of Science?’ Philosophy of Science 52, 517–537.
Simon, H.A. (1957), Models of Man. (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
Stroud, B. (1981), ‘The Significance of Naturalized Epistemology’. In Midwest Studies in Philosophy. (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press). 455–471.
Tolman, E.C. (1948), ‘Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men’. Psychological Review 55, 189–208.
Toulmin, S. (1972), Human Knowledge. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Tweney, R.D., M.E. Doherty, and C.R. Mynatt, eds. (1981), On Scientific Thinking. (New York: Columbia University Press).
van Fraassen, B.C. (1980), The Scientific Image. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giere, R.N. (1987). The Cognitive Study of Science. In: Nersessian, N.J. (eds) The Process of Science. Science and Philosophy, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3519-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3519-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8072-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3519-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive