Skip to main content

The Cognitive Study of Science

  • Chapter
The Process of Science

Part of the book series: Science and Philosophy ((SCPH,volume 3))

Abstract

The aim of the cognitive study of science is to develop a cognitive theory of science. But what is meant by a ‘theory’ of science? And why do I call it ‘cognitive’?1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Barnes, Barry (1974), Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Barry and David Edge, eds. (1982), Science in Context. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Barry and David Bloor. (1982), ‘Relativitism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge’. In M. Hollis and S. Lukes, eds., Rationality and Relativism. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 21–47).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F.C. (1932), Remembering. (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David (1976), Knowledge and Social Imagery. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1981), ‘Scientific Realism and Naturalistic Epistemology’. In P. D. Asquith and R. N. Giere, eds. PSA 1980, Vol. 2. (East Lansing, MI: The Philosophy of Science Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, M. (1986), ‘Assessing Evolutionary Epistemologies’. Biology and Philosophy, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. (1959), ‘Methodological Suggestions from a Comparative Psychology of Knowledge Processes’. Inquiry, 2, 152–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. (1960), ‘Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes’. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. (1966), ‘Pattern Matching as Essential in Distal Knowing’. In The Psychology of Egon Brunswick, K.R. Hammond, ed. (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston) 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. (1974), ‘Evolutionary Epistemology’. In P. A. Schilpp, ed., The Philosophy of Karl Popper. (La Salle: Open Court) 413–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. (1979), Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. and C.A. Hooker. (1985), Images of Science. (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M. and T.J. Pinch. (1982), Frames of Meaning. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMey, Marc (1982), The Cognitive Paradigm. (Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, David and Michael Mulkay. (1976), Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain. (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, David (1984), The Limits of Scientific Reasoning. (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamow, G. (1947), One, Two, Three... Infinity. (New York: The Viking Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Howard (1985), The Mind’s New Science. (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1972), Problems and Projects. (Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H.E., and P.H. Barrett. (1974), Darwin on Man. (New York: Dutton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. and J.J. Voneche, eds. (1977), The Essential Piaget. (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (1971), Knowledge and Human Interests. (Boston: Beacon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugeland, John, ed. (1981), Mind Design. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. and S. Lukes, eds. (1982), Rationality and Relativism. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C.A. (1978), ‘An Evolutionary Naturalist Realist Doctrine of Perception and Secondary Qualities’. In Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 9. C. Wade Savage, ed. (Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983), Mental Models. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. (1982), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge. (Oxford: Pergamon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K.D. and Michael Mulkay, eds. (1983), Science Observed. (Hollywood, CA: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, H., ed. (1985), Naturalizing Epistemology. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd ed., 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1974), ‘Second Thoughts on Paradigms’. In The Structure of Scientific Theories. F. Suppe, ed. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 459–82).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1970), ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno and Steve Woolgar. (1979), Laboratory Life. (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems. (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1984), ‘Explaining the Success of Science: Beyond Epistemic Realism and Relativism.’ In Science and Reality. J. T. Cushing, C. F. Delaney, and Gary M. Gutting, eds. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. et al. (1986), ‘Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research’. Synthese 69, 141–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leplin, J. ed. (1984), Scientific Realism. (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, C and E.O. Wilson. (1981), Genes, Mind, and Culture. (Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Thomas (1978), The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. (Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minski, M. (1975), ‘A Framework for Representing Knowledge’. In P. H. Winston, ed., The Psychology of Computer Vision. (New York: McGraw-Hill) 211–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1976), Cognition and Reality. (New York: W. H. Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton-Smith, W.H. (1981), The Rationality of Science. (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. and L. Ross. (1980), Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1984), Constructing Quarks. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin, H.C. ed. (1982), Learning, Development, and Culture. (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. (1984), Computation and Cognition. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1982), ‘Why Reason Cаn’t be Naturalized’. Synthese 52, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensch, B. (1971), Biophilosophy. (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1979), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Robert A., Charles D. Laughlin, Jr., and John McManus. (1984), Science as a Cognitive Process. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1986), Taking Darwin Seriously (Dordrecht-Holland: Reidel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, Steven (1982), ‘History of Science and its Sociological Reconstructions’. History of Science XX, 157–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (1980), ‘Justification, Discovery and the Naturalizing of Epistemology’. Philosophy of Science 47, 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H. (1985), ‘What is the Question Concerning the Rationality of Science?’ Philosophy of Science 52, 517–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1957), Models of Man. (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, B. (1981), ‘The Significance of Naturalized Epistemology’. In Midwest Studies in Philosophy. (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press). 455–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E.C. (1948), ‘Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men’. Psychological Review 55, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1972), Human Knowledge. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R.D., M.E. Doherty, and C.R. Mynatt, eds. (1981), On Scientific Thinking. (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.C. (1980), The Scientific Image. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giere, R.N. (1987). The Cognitive Study of Science. In: Nersessian, N.J. (eds) The Process of Science. Science and Philosophy, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3519-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3519-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8072-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3519-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics