Abstract
In the early history of its commercial and administrative presence on the Indian subcontinent British servants of the East India Company treated native healers of south Asia with as much respect as they treated English physicians. In part, this respect was provoked by the European belief that certain illnesses were caused by the airs and water of a country (Jones 1967); hence treatment of such illnesses required the diagnostic skill as well as pharmacological knowledge of the physicians of that country, in this case the hakims and vaidyas. To this personal view must be added the Company’s considerable interest in the discovery of useful native plants, such as medicines and dyes, the knowledge of which was published in the early issues of Asiaticke Researches, later the Journal of the Asiatic Society. The journal, and indeed the Society, was founded by a group of Englishmen, trained in the classics, who developed an interest in the ancient languages and civilizations of the Indian subcontinent. Even though in some cases these Englishmen, dubbed Orientalists, might have thought the Brahmans of Bengal to be poorly qualified, indeed degenerate, inheritors of a glorious civilization, this did not diminish their respect for the civilization itself. ‘Native doctors’ were attached to regiments and civil stations; and ayurvedic medicine was taught in conjunction with English medicine at the Calcutta Sanskrit College, founded with Company support in 1824 (Gupta 1976: 369).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bhatia, J. C., Dharam, Vir, Timmoppaya, A. and Chattari, C. S. 1975 Traditional Healers and Modern Medicine. Social Science & Medicine 9: 15–22.
Gupta, Brahmananda 1976 Indigenous Medicine in Nineteenth-and twentieth-century Bengal. In Asian Medical Systems. Leslie, C. (ed.) pp. 368–78. Los Angeles & Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hume, J. 1977 Rival Traditions: Western Medicine and Yunan-i-tibb in the Punjab, 1849–1889. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 51: 214–31.
Jeffery, R. 1979 Recognizing India’s Doctors: the Establishment of Medical Dependency: 1918–1939. Modern Asian Studies 13: 301–26.
Jeffery, R. 1982 Policies towards indigenous healers in Independent India. Social Science & Medicine 16: 1835–41.
Jones, M. O. 1967 Climate and Disease: the Traveller Describes America. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 41: 254–66.
‘Kokca’, Harnarayan. Adhunik Elopaithik Injeksan Buk [The Modern Alopathic Injection Book] Delhi: Dehati Pustak Bhandar, n.d.
Kutumbiah, P. 1962 Ancient Indian Medicine. Madras: Orient Longmans.
Leslie, C. 1976 The Ambiguities of Medical Revivalism in Modern India. In Asian Medical Systems. Leslie, C. (ed.) pp. 356–67 Los Angeles & Berkeley: University of California Press.
Tabor, D. 1981 Ripe and Unripe: Concepts of Health and Sickness in Ayurvedic Medicine. Social Science & Medicine 15: 439–455.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burghart, R. (1988). Penicillin: An Ancient Ayurvedic Medicine. In: van der Geest, S., Whyte, S.R. (eds) The Context of Medicines in Developing Countries. Culture, Illness, and Healing, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2713-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2713-1_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7722-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2713-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive