Abstract
There have been a number of studies of divergence in social perception of the causes of various economic phenomena (Furnham, 1984). Differences between supporters of the major British political parties have been found in terms of the salience of causal categories. Conservative supporters emphasize individualistic causes whereas labour supporters focus on societal causes. This research assumes that people across political affiliations basically share the same category system for the causes and differ in terms of which categories are salient.
An alternative approach to social perception has been developed based on perceived causal structures. A method based on sociometry has been developed to obtain representations of causes as implicit causal models.
A study of divergence in social perception as difference in perceived causal structure shows that people with different political affiliations have implicit causal structures which vary in complexity and direction of causality. The implications of these results for theories of social perception and attribution are considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bar-Tal, D., & Guttman, J. (1981). A comparison of teachers’, pupils’, and parents’ attributions regarding pupils academic achievements. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 301–311.
Feather, N. (1974). Explanations for poverty in Australian and American samples: The person, society, and fate? Australian Journal of Psychology, 26, 199–216.
Furnham, A. (1982). Explanations for unemployment in Britain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 335–352.
Furnham, A. (1984). Unemployment, attribution theory, and mental health: A review of the British literature. International Journal of Mental Health, 13, 51–67.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Kelley, H.H. (1983). Perceived causal structures. In: J. Jaspars, F.D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental, & social dimensions, London: Academic Press.
Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J.H. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Lunt, P.K. (1987). Perceived causal structure and attributional reasoning. Oxford: University of Oxford. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Lunt, P.K. (1988). The perceived causal structure of examination failure. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 171–179.
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In: R.M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tetlock, P.E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74–83.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lunt, P.K. (1989). The Perceived Causal Structure of Unemployment. In: Grunert, K.G., Ölander, F. (eds) Understanding Economic Behaviour. Theory and Decision Library, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2470-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2470-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7614-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2470-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive