Abstract
Plato, I believe, would consider the modern curriculum to be the product of unnatural divorces between poetry and philosophy, mythos and dialectic, and oral and written expression. Unwilling to give up any curricular part of the soul’s instruction, Plato would teach them all. He does so in the Phaedrus, for example. The Phaedrus contains a variety of themes — love, the soul, the beautiful, dialectic, poetic inspiration, virtue and knowledge — yet Plato finds unity in them all, for each is fundamentally erotic. Moreover the dialogue contains a variety of structures — dialectic certainly, but also formal and informal rhetoric, myth and narrative — each displaying its own touch of light irony. Through the wit of his ironic style, and the erotic drive fundamental to his thematic topoi, Plato achieves coherence in his dialogue and union between the disciplines of poetry, philosophy, rhetoric, and dialectic. The clearest way to see this union is through the means Plato himself chooses, through dialogue employing mythic images; here lies a partnership structurally reflective of what it portrays. Mythos and dialectic wed are like the metaphorical horses in Plato’s image of the soul’s chariot.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
All quotations from Plato’s Phaedrus are from the translation by W. C. Helmbold and W. G. Rabinowitz (Indianapolis: Bobbs Merill Publishing, 1977). Reprinted with permission of Macmillan Publishing Company. Copyright © 1956 by Macmillan Publishing Company, renewed 1984 by William C. Helmbold and Wilson Rabinowitz.
Ovid, The Metamorphoses, tr. Mary M. Innes (London: Penguin Books, 1955) pp. 153–4.
According to Anthon’s Classical Dictionary “Boreas” (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1841) p. 264, there are only two complete accounts of the myth in Greek antiquity: Apollodorus, Bibliotheka III, 15,2; Apollonius of Rhodes, Argonautica I, 211. In neither of these accounts does Boreas do anything other than swoop down and passionately seize Orithyia, carry her off, and engender heroic sons by her.
Seth Benardete, in his Phaedrus Lecture (given in April 1981 for the Institute of Philosophic Studies, University of Dallas) makes this language comparison.
Benardete, Phaedrus Lecture, makes this point about the white horse finally representing prudence, if not moderation.
Benardete, Phaedrus Lecture.
Paul Friedländer, Plato, tr. Hans Meyerhoff (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1969) p. 240, makes these observations about Pan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, D.L. (1990). Erotic Modes of Discourse: The Union of Mythos and Dialectic in Plato’s Phaedrus. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) The Elemental Passions of the Soul Poetics of the Elements in the Human Condition: Part 3. Analecta Husserliana, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2335-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2335-5_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7550-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2335-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive