Skip to main content

Style and Idea in the Later Heidegger: Rhetoric, Politics and Philosophy

  • Chapter
Style, Politics and the Future of Philosophy

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 114))

  • 105 Accesses

Abstract

After fifteen years Robert Minder’s learned analysis of Heidegger’s lecture on Johann Peter Hebel remains by far the most persuasive effort to link Heidegger’s thought to Nazism.1 Minder does this through a deft exegesis of the style of Heidegger’s essay, which leaves no room for doubting that there are highly significant connections between the later Heidegger’s style and a certain conservative, Catholic-peasant ideology which could and in fact did easily become Nazified. Proceeding from the (dubious) premiss that Adorno’s philosophical analysis of the “Jargon of Authenticity” accurately exposes the philosophical shortcomings of Heidegger’s Seinsdenken, Minder considers the later Heidegger’s literary affiliations with the same end in view. Heidegger’s style goes through four phases. First, we have his early student years when his writing is aridly academic. In his second period he writes Sein und Zeit in a style that adapts Expressionism to philosophical prose. The third phase coincides with his overt support of the Hitler regime as rector of the University of Freiburg in 1933 and is, consequently, overtly Nazi. The final phase, Minder argues, represents a muted depoliticization of Nazi pseudo-Romantic obscurantism. This represents an extension of the thesis first advanced in Paul Hühnerfeld’s trenchant study In Sachen Heidegger.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robert Minder, “Heidegger und Hebel oder Die Sprache von Messkirch”, Dichter in der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt/Main, 1966), pp. 211–64.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul Hühnerfeld, In Sachen Heidegger (Hamburg, 1959), p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin Heidegger, Hebel der Hausfreund (Pfullingen, 1957), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. George Mosse, The Crisis of German Ideology (New York, 1964), passim.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For an historically accurate account of Hebel and his work see Uli Daester, Johann Peter Hebel in Selbstzeugnissen und Bilddokumenten (Reinbeck, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilhelm Shäfer, cited by Minder, “Heidegger und Hebel”, p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heidegger, “Der Feldweg”, Wort und Wahrheit 5 (1950), p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heidegger, “Der Spruch des Anaximander”, Holzwege (Frankfurt/Main, 1950), pp. 296–343;

    Google Scholar 

  9. “Die Sprache im Gedicht”, Unterwegs zur Sprache (Pfullingen, 1959), pp. 35–82.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Personal communication from Norbert R. Wolff, professor of German, Würzburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Interview with Martin Heidegger, “Nur ein Gott Kann uns Retten”, Der Spiegel 23 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit (Tübingen, 1977), pp. 153–60; cf. “Zeit und Sein”, Zur Sache des Denkens (Tübingen, 1976), pp. 24–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. George Steiner, Heidegger (London, 1978), pp. 112–21.Steiner’s views on this matter, i.e. his reluctance to pronounce upon Heidegger one way or another, deserve to be taken especially seriously on account of his vast knowledge of German lanugage and literature and his commitment to the notion that the Nazi experience utterly transformed German; see his Lanugage and Silence (New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steiner, Heidegger, p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  15. If I am not mistaken, this is the point of Heidegger, Hebel, pp. 24–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Anthony Kenny, Wittgenstein (Harmondsworth, 1973), pp. 219–32.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. G. Collingwood, An Essay on Metaphysics (Oxford, 1940), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  18. This is emphasized by Lucien Goldmann in his Lukács et Heidegger (Paris, 1973), pp. 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Minder, “Heidegger und Hebel”, p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robert A. Kann, A Study in Austrian Intellectual History (New York, 1960), pp. 92–3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abraham a Santa Clara, “Der alte Hafen scheppert”, Auswahl aus Abraham a Santa Clara, ed. Karl Bertsche (Bonn, 1911), pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abraham a Santa Clara “Hui and Pfui der Welt”, p. 479, cited in Kann, p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Vermischte Bemerkungen (Franfurt/Main, 1977), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eg. Wilhelm von Humboldt’s notion of an “innere Sprachform” in Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie, Werke (5 vols.; Stuttgart, 1963), III, p. 192.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heidegger, Sein, pp. 66–76 et passim.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Heidegger, Sein, pp. 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rudolf Carnap, “The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language”, Logical Positivism, ed. A. J. Ayer (Glencoe, III., 1959), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heidegger’s move in saying things like das Nichts nichtet is best understood by comparison with G. E. Moore’s anti-reductionist use of the term good in the sentence ‘the good is good’. Moore insisted that this is all one can say about the good but that the sentence cannot be a proposition (i.e. true or false). G. E. Moore Principia Ethica (Cambridge, 1971), pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hühnerfeld has emphasized this, In Sachen, p. 75ff.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walter Sokel, The Writer in Extremis (Stanford, 1959), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walter Kaufman, Prologue, Martin Buber,I and Thou (New York, 1970), pp. 7–48, 110n. 6; cf. Discovering the Mind (3 vols.; New York, 1979–1981), II, p. 206 et passim.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hühnerfeld, In Sachen, p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Heidegger, Sein, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  34. On Husserl see Peter Koestenbaum’s introductory essay to his edition of Husserl, The Paris Lectures (The Hague, 1970), pp. ix-lxxvii.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heidegger, Sein, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  36. I have explored some of these similarities in a lecture on Wittgenstein and Heidegger at the University of Tel-Aviv in 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Heidegger, Sein, pp. 175–80.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Heidegger, Sein, pp. 164–65.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Heidegger, Sein, pp. 153–60.

    Google Scholar 

  40. I have discussed this in “Wittgenstein: an Austrian Enigma”, Austrian Philosophy, ed. J. C. Nyíri (Munich, 1981), pp. 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1970), p. 103 et passim.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Heidegger, Nietzsche (2 vols.; Pfuilingen, 1961), I, pp. 253–38.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kuhn, Structure, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Heidegger, Nietzsche, II, p. 21ff.; cf. “Die Zeit des Weltbildes”, Holzwege, pp. 69–104. It is worth contrasting Heidegger’s view of the matter with Hitler’s: “Alle diese Verfallserscheinungen sind im letzten Grunde nur Folgen des Mangels einer bestimmten, gleichmässig annerkannten Weltanschauung sowie der daraus sich ergebenden allgemeinen Unsicherheit in der Beurteilung und der Stellungnahme zu den einzelnen grossen Fragen der Zeit”, Mein Kampf (Munich, 1938), p. 292.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stern, Ernst Jünger (New Haven, 1953), p. 13–7 et passim.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hühnerfeld writes that Heidegger’s students reported Heidegger complaining about the Nazis in 1936, In Sachen, p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Heidegger, Nietzsche, I, pp. 29–33, p. 650.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Heidegger, Nietzsche, I, p. 399.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Heidegger, Nietzsche, I, p. 367.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Heidegger, Nietzsche, I, p. 101ff.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Heidegger, Nietzsche, I, p. 185 et passim.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Heidegger, Nietzsche, II, p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kuhn, Structure, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Heidegger, “Zeit und Sein”, pp. 21–5; cf. Nietzsche, II, p. 489.

    Google Scholar 

  55. On Loyola see Roland Barthes, “L’arbre de la foi”, preface to Ignatius Loyola, Exercises spirituels (Paris, 1972), pp. 5–53.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Heidegger, Sein, p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  57. See Andre Thébaut, “Edification”, Dictionnaire de spititualité, (Paris, 1937-), IV, pp. 287–93.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kierkegaard, Hâte-toi, discours 2, par. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kierkegaard, Hâte-toi, I, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kierkegaard, Religiöse Reden, trans. Theodor Haecker (Leipzig, 1936), pp. 109–10.

    Google Scholar 

  61. On Eckhart and Heidegger see John Caputo, “Meister Eckhart and the Late Heidegger”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 12, (1974); 13 (1975) 61–80; cf. Caputo’s The Mystical Element in Heidegger’s Thought (Athens, Ohio, 1978). I have benefited greatly from numerous conversations and discussions of Heidegger with Professor Caputo. I am also grateful to Professor Caputo for allowing me to read the typescript of his book. For an appreciation of Meister Eckhart’s contribution to German vernacular philosophical vocabulary from a very different perspective (but nonetheless enthusiastic for all that) see Fritz Mauthner, Wörterbuch der Philosophie (2nd. ed.; 3 vols.; Leipzig, 1923–1924), III, pp. 371–79.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Marie Jaarus Kurrik, Georg Trakl (New York, 1974), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Heidegger, Hebel, pp. 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Heidegger, Hebel, pp. 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Heidegger, Hebel, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Heidegger, Hebel, pp. 11–2.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Heidegger, Hebel, p. 13. My emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Heidegger, Hebel, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Heidegger, Hebel, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Heidegger, Hebel, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Heidegger, Hebel, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Goethe, cited by Heidegger, Hebel, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Heidegger, Gelassenheit, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  74. This is clearest in the philosophical fable, Der Feldweg, see n. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hans Seigfried, “Martin Heidegger: A Recollection”, Man and World 3 (1970), pp. 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. See n. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  77. On Haecker see Eugen Blessing, Theodor Haecker (Nürnberg, 1959); on Ebner see Theodor Steinbuchl, Der Umbruch des Denkens (Regensburg, 1936). I am indebted to Friedrich Lehne for information about Ebner as a model for Catholic socialists.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Theodor Haecker, “Betrachtungen über Vergil, Vater des Abendlandes”, Der Brenner, 17 (1932), p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  79. John Boyer, Political Radicalism in Imperial Vienna (Chicago and London, 1981), p. 464.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Stern, Hitler, p. 20 et passim.

    Google Scholar 

  81. See Jean Ladrière, “Langage des spirituels”, Dictionnaire de spiritualité, p. 9, pp. 204–17.

    Google Scholar 

  82. See n. 48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Janik, A. (1989). Style and Idea in the Later Heidegger: Rhetoric, Politics and Philosophy. In: Style, Politics and the Future of Philosophy. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 114. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2251-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2251-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7508-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2251-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics