Skip to main content

Ecological Field Theory: the concept and field tests

  • Chapter
Progress in theoretical vegetation science

Part of the book series: Advances in vegetation science ((AIVS,volume 11))

  • 291 Accesses

Abstract

Ecological field theory (EFT) quantifies plant spatial influences as pulsating geometric zones about individual plants. It provides the basis for a methodology to include spatial interactions between plants of different size, function and growth-form in models of plant community dynamics. The key components of EFT are: 1. the influence domain of individuals (D), 2. the field intensity within the domains (I), 3. the influence surface (ID) and 4. the intensity of interactions (II). The means to calculate these key components are outlined and several tests of the methodology as applied to a semi-arid eucalypt woodland are presented. The tests include a comparison of measured shrub growth with a computer implementation of EFT (the RESCOMP model) and spatial growth data from the eucalypt woodland to support the postulates included in EFT. Practical uses expected for the method are in agroforestry, landscape rehabilitation, simulations of disturbance effects and in determining invasibility of plant communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Abbreviations

ARGR:

Actual Relative Growth Rate

EFT:

Ecological Field Theory

IRM:

Integrated Rate Method

PRGR:

Potential Relative Growth Rate

RESCOMP:

RESource COMPetition model

SMRGR:

Spatially Modified Relative Growth Rate

References

  • Beeston, G. R., Walker, P. J., Purdie, R. & Pickard, J. 1980. Plant communities of the poplar box (Eucalyptus populnea) lands of Eastern Australia. Aust. Rangel. J. 2: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begg, J. E. & Cunningham, R. B., 1974. Penetration of radiation into a eucalypt woodland. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci., 40: 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunack, M. V. & Walker, J. 1985. Recovery of some surface soil properties following sheep grazing regimes on a semi-arid woodland. Aust. J. Ecol. 10: 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, G. & Nicholls, A. O. 1981. Effects of vegetation communities on the simulated soil water balance in Eucalyptus populnea lands. Aust. Rangel. J. 3: 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charley, J. L. & West, N. E. 1975. Plant-induced soil chemical patterns in some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. J. Ecol. 63: 945–964.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, M. J. 1986. Plant ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, E. D. 1975. Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures. J. Ecol. 63: 311–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, E. D. & Diggle, P. J. 1981. Competition for light in a plant monoculture modelled as a spatial stochastic process. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 48 (4): 481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, D. J. 1982. Competition and skewness in plantations. J. theor. Biol. 94: 909–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, D. J. & Westcott, M. 1981. Negative skewness and negative correlations in spatial competition models. J. Math. Biol. 13: 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, D. L. B., Walker, J. & Penridge, L. K. 1986. Interpretation of vegetation structure in Landsat MSS imagery: a case study in disturbed semi-arid eucalypt woodlands. Part 2. Model-based analysis. J. Environ. Managern. 23: 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuuluvainen, T. & Pukkala, T. 1987. Effect of crown shape and tree distribution on the spatial distribution of shade. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 40: 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nix, H. A. 1982. Environmental determinants of biogeography, and evolution in Terra Australis. In: Barker, W.R. & Greenslade, P. J. M. (eds), Evolution of the flora and fauna of arid Australia, pp. 47–66. Peacock Publications, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, I. R. & Slatyer, R. O. 1980. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43: 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. L., Sharpe, P. J. H. & Wu, H. 1985. Whole plant modelling: A continuous-time Markov (CTM) approach. Ecol. Modell. 29: 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penridge, L. K. & Walker, J. 1986. The effect of neighbouring trees on eucalypt growth in a semi-arid woodland in Australia, J. Ecol. 74: 925–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penridge, L. K., Walker, J., Sharpe, P. J. H., Spence, R. D., Wu, H. & Zou, G. 1987. RESCOMP: A resource competition model to simulate the dynamics of vegetation cover. CSIRO Div. of Water and Land Resources Technical Memorandum 87/5, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, L. 1977. Mathematical ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reece, P. H. & Campbell, B. L. 1986. The use of 137Cs for determining soil erosion differences in a disturbed and non-disturbed semi-arid ecosystem. In: Rangelands: A resource under siege. Proc. of the Second International Rangeland Congress. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, P. J. H., Walker, J., Penridge, L. K. & Wu, H. 1985. A physiologically-based continuous-time Markov approach to plant growth modelling in semi-arid woodlands. Ecol. Modell. 29: 189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, P. J. H., Walker, J., Penridge, L. K., Wu, H. & Rykiel, E. J. 1986. Spatial considerations in physiological models of tree growth. Tree Physiol. 2: 403–421.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, H. H. 1984. A theory of forest dynamics. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. M. & Goodman, P. S. 1986. The effect of competition on the structure and dynamics of Acacia savannas in southern Africa. J. Ecol. 74: 1031–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. 1988. Dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall, B. R. & Walker, J. 1975. The effect of woodland disturbance on soil water, Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 9: 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tongeren, O. & Prentice, I. C. 1986. A spatial simulation model for vegetation dynamics. Vegetatio 65: 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., Moore, R. M. & Robertson, J. A. 1972. Herbage response to tree, and shrub thinning in E. populnea woodlands. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23: 405–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., Thompson, C. H., Fergus, I. F. & Tunstall, B. R. 1981. Plant succession and soil development in coastal sand dunes of sub-tropical eastern Australia. In: West, D., Shugart, H. H. & Botkin, D. (eds), Forest succession — concepts and applications, pp. 107–126. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., Robertson, J. A., Penridge, L. K. & Sharpe, P. J. H. 1986. Herbage response to tree thinning in a Eucalyptus crebra woodland. Aust. J. Ecol. 11: 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J. 1984. Neighbourhood interference amongst Pinus rígida individuals. J. Ecol. 72: 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, F. I. 1987. Climate and plant distribution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H., Sharpe, P. J. H., Walker, J. & Penridge, L. K. 1985. Ecological field theory (EFT): A spatial analysis of resource interference among plants. Ecol. Modell. 29: 215–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinke, P. J., 1962. The pattern of individual forest trees on soil properties. Ecology 43: 130–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

G. Grabherr L. Mucina M. B. Dale C. J. F. Ter Braak

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walker, J., Sharpe, P.J.H., Penridge, L.K., Wu, H. (1990). Ecological Field Theory: the concept and field tests. In: Grabherr, G., Mucina, L., Dale, M.B., Ter Braak, C.J.F. (eds) Progress in theoretical vegetation science. Advances in vegetation science, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1934-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1934-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7363-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1934-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics