Skip to main content

Computerized matching of relevés and association tables, with an application to the British National Vegetation Classification

  • Chapter
Progress in theoretical vegetation science

Part of the book series: Advances in vegetation science ((AIVS,volume 11))

  • 279 Accesses

Abstract

When a new relevé is to be assigned to a pre-existing type, its composition is compared with an association table. Bayesian inference may seem a good way to make the comparison, but presents difficulties. In an alternative approach, three indices of goodness-of-fit are proposed. Compositional satisfaction is a measure of how well the species composition of the relevé fits the constancy classes in the table; it is a minor modification of the Czekanowski coefficient of similarity between observed and expected numbers of species in each constancy class. Dominance satisfaction is a modification of the Czekanowski similarity between the relevé and cover values that might be expected from the association table. Dominance constancy is a weighted mean of the constancy class of the four most abundant species in the relevé. A computer program, TABLEFIT, combines them into a single index. It has been tested on British mire vegetation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Currall, J.E.P. 1987. A transformation of the Domin scale. Vegetatio 72: 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digby, P.G.N. & Kempton, R.A. 1987. Multivariate analysis of ecological communities. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. 1980. Rapid initial clustering of large data sets. Vegetatio 42: 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, D.W. 1966. Deviant index — a new tool for numerical taxonomy. Nature 210: 216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O., Bunce, R.G.H. & Shaw, M.W. 1975. Indicator species analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland. J. Ecol. 63: 597–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVean, D.N. & Ratcliffe, D.R. 1962. Plant communities of the Scottish Highlands. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, LR. 1987. The role of expert systems in vegetation science. Vegetatio 69: 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. 2nd ed. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst, R.J. 1975. Identification by matching. In: R.J. Pankhurst (ed.), Biological identification with computers, pp. 79–91. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, J. 1986–7. The National Vegetation Classification: Mires. University of Lancaster, unpublished report to the Nature Conservancy Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, J. 1988. The National Vegetation Classification: almost there! Bull. Br. Ecol. Soc. 19: 75–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seal, H.L. 1964. Multivariate statistical analysis for biologists. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D.J. & Knill-Jones, R.P. 1984. Statistical and knowledge-based approaches to clinical decision-support systems, with an application in gastroenterology. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. A. 147: 35–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C.J.F. 1986. Interpreting a hierarchical classification with simple discriminant functions: an ecological example. In: Diday, E. et al. (eds), Data analysis and informatics, IV. pp. 11–21. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Maarel, E., Janssen, J.G.M. & Louppen, J.M.W. 1978. TABORD, a program for structuring phytosociological tables. Vegetatio 38: 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhoff, V. & van der Maarel, E. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: Whittaker, R.H. (ed.), Ordination and classification of communities, pp. 617–726. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

G. Grabherr L. Mucina M. B. Dale C. J. F. Ter Braak

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hill, M.O. (1990). Computerized matching of relevés and association tables, with an application to the British National Vegetation Classification. In: Grabherr, G., Mucina, L., Dale, M.B., Ter Braak, C.J.F. (eds) Progress in theoretical vegetation science. Advances in vegetation science, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1934-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1934-1_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7363-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1934-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics