Abstract
At first sight, the work of Ortega y Gasset seems difficult to catalogue philosophically. An omnivorous reader, he sated his philosophical appetite in so heterogeneous a medley of thinkers that it would appear quite impossible to decide which of them most roundly influenced his intellectual trajectory. Ortega himself was never very wont to acknowledge debts or masters; on the contrary, he strove to figure as a thinker with an original philosophy of his own that could not be assimilated to any other. The disciples who followed him perhaps defended too jealously their master’s reputation for radical originality, possibly with the intention of adding to his prestige. The result was quite the reverse: for many years, Ortega’s image in his own country was that of a philosopher who was out of touch with the most vigorous philosophical trends current in Europe, that of an unthroned thinker remembered only by his Spanish disciples. In an anemic postwar Spain deprived of direction, Ortega offered a philosophy of reason rooted in vitality.
In der letzen Woche hatten wir einen sehr interessanten phil. Besuch: Ortega y Gasset, der uns eine grosse uberraschung brachte: Er ist ganz tief eingearbeitet in meine Schriften. Es gab mit u. F[ink] täglich grosse u. ernste Gespräche, seine Fragen in die schwierigsten Tiefe dringend. Er ist wirklich nicht nur als Publizist Erzieher des neuen Spanien, sondern als Professor Leiter einer Phä[nomenologischen] Schule. Jetzt wird von ihm eine übersetzung der Medit[ationen] erfolgen u. dann der übrigen Werke (die Log[ischen] Unters[uchungen] sind dort in der sp[anischen] Ausgabe in aller Händen), übrigens ein wundervoller Mensch.1 Edmund Husserl; Briefe an R. Ingarden, LXXIII (26.11.1934)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Husserl, Edmund, Ideen zu einen reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, (1913). ed. Karl Schumann (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970), Para. 24, p.51.
Cerezo Galan, P., La voluntad de Aventura ( Madrid: Ariel 1984 ), p. 211.
Husserl, Edmund, Die Krisis der euroäischen Wissenschaften und die tranzendentale Phänomenologien. Einleitung in die phanomenologische Philosophie, (1954), ed. W. Biemel (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962), Para. 48, p. 169 (footnote).
Levinas, Emmanuel, “La ruine de la representation,” in Edmund Husserl 1858–1958, eds. Van Breda, H.-L. and Taminiaux J. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1959). This essay is also included in Levinas, E., En decouvrant l’existence avec Husserl et Heidegger ( Paris: Vrin, 1982 ), pp. 125–135.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, Fenomenología de la percepción (Barcelona: Península, 1975), p. 16.
Didier, Frank, Chair et corps. Sur la phenomenologie de Husserl ( Paris: Edit. De Edit., 1975 ), p. 13.
Landgrebe, Ludwig, Fenimenología e Historia ( Buenos Aires: Monte Avila Edit., 1975 ), p. 13.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rodriguez Rial, N. (1990). Ortega — Phenomenologist. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Man’s Self-Interpretation-in-Existence. Analecta Husserliana, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1864-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1864-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7331-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1864-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive