Skip to main content

Information bases for environmental policies

  • Chapter
National Accounts and the Environment

Abstract

Our aim is to consider in what way a given environmental policy can be supported in terms of basic information. For instance, imagine that it was decided that the problem of the greenhouse effect should be dealt with. What information would be necessary for the policy-maker?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alfsen K., K. A. Brekke, F. Brunvoll, H. Luras, K. Nyborg, H. V. Saebo, Environmental Indicators, Central Bureau of Statistics, Norway, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amy D. J., “Decision Techniques for Environmental Policy: A Critique”, in R. Paehlke and D. Torgerson, Managing Leviatan: Environmental Politics and the Administrative State, Belhaven Press, London, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi F., P. Nijkamp (eds), Economy and Ecology. Towards Sustainable Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braat L., “The Predictive Meaning of Sustainability Indicators”, pp. 57–70, in O. Kuik and H. Verbruggen (eds), in In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan J. M., G. Tullock, “Polluters’ Profits and Political Response: Direct Controls Versus Taxes”, American Economic Review, 65, 1, 139–147, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi G., P. Bobbitt, Tragic Choices, Norton & Co., New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), Natural Resources and the Environment 1991, Central Bureau of Statistics, Norway, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerelli E., “Scelte tragiche e scelte pubbliche”, in I. Musu (ed), Economia e Ambiente, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn R., “Trade-offs in Designing Markets with Multiple Objectives”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13, 1–12, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn R., A Primer to Environmental Policy Design, Harwood Academic Publishers, London, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huppes G., E. Van der Voet, W. G. H. Van der Naald, G. H. Vonkeman and P. Maxson, New Market-Oriented Instruments for Environmental Policies, Graham and Trotman, London, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard W., C. Smith, Conflict Analysis and Practical Conflict Management Procedures, Ballinga, Cambridge, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs M., The Green Economy. Environment Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future, Pluto Press, London, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassen R., P. Nijkamp and H. Voog, “Environmental Policy Analysis: Which Method for Which Problem?”, Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 14, 5, 45–53, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassen R., P. Nijkamp, Interactive Multicriteria Decision Support for Environmental Management, Eurinf. paper, 88 Conf, Athens, May 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuik O., H. Verbruggen (eds), In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuik O., F. H. Oosterhuis, H. M. Jansen, K. Kolm, H-J. Ewers, Assessment of Benefits of Environmental Measures, Graham and Trotman, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave L., H. Gruenspecht, “Increasing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Environmental Decisions: Benefit-Cost Analysis and Effluent Fees. A critical Review”, Journal of Air and Waste Management, 41, 5, 680–693, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverman D. M., M. E. Hanson, B. J. Brown, R. W. Meredith, “Global Sustainability: Towards Measurement”, Environmental Management, 12, 2, 133–43, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menelick S. R., “The Politics of Benefit-Cost Analysis”, ch. 3, in National Research Council, Valuing Health Risk Costs and Benefit for Environment Decision Making, National Academy Press, Washington, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P., “Multicriteria Analysis: A Decision Support System For Sustainable Environmental Management”, in F. Archibugi and P. Nijkamp (eds), Economy and Ecology. Towards Sustainable Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oecd, Economics and the Environment. Issues for Policy Responses, Oecd, Paris, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opschoor H., L. Reijnders, “Towards Sustainable Development Indicators”, pp. 7–27, in O. Kuik and H. Verbruggen (eds), In Search of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paehlke R. and D. Torgerson (eds.), Managing Leviathan: Environmental Politics and the Administrative State, Belhaven Press, London, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld P., Multiple Objective Decision Methods and Regional Planning, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell M., “The Making of Cruel Choices”, ch. 2, National Research Council, Valuing Health Risk Costs and Benefit for Environment Decision Making, National Academy Press, Washington, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory A., Holistic Resource Management, Island Press, Covelo, CA, USA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow R., “Defending Cost Benefit Analysis: Replies to Steven Kelman”, Regulation, 5, 39–41, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind L., G. McMahon, “The Theory and Practice of Negotiated Rulemaking”, Yale Journal of Regulation, 3, 133–65, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk F., “Decision Making About the Environment: The Role of Information”, ch. 5, in Kraan and in’t Veld, Environmental Protection: Public or Private Choice, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos J. B., J. Feenstra, J. de Boer, L. C. Braat, J. van Baalen, Indicators for the State of the Environment, Institute for Environmental Studies Report 1985/1, Amsterdam, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gerelli, E., Patrizii, V. (1996). Information bases for environmental policies. In: Musu, I., Siniscalco, D. (eds) National Accounts and the Environment. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1592-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1592-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7213-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1592-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics