Skip to main content

Intercomparison of Wet-Only Collectors for Measuring Wet Deposition

  • Chapter
Physico-Chemical Behaviour of Atmospheric Pollutants
  • 45 Accesses

Summary

20 precipitation wet only collectors of 11 different designs have been investigated in a field intercomparison. For the bulk ions, deviations between the various types exceeded 20%. For the trace metals, even larger differences occurred. Three main reasons were made responsible:

  1. 1.

    Poor sensitivity of precipitation sensors.

  2. 2.

    Wetting losses in the funnels, causing a memory effect.

  3. 3.

    Interchange between rain water and materials of the collection device.

By rinsing experiments with diluted HNO3 we found that appreciable amounts of trace metals accumulate at the funnel walls. Under high outside pollution concentrations gases penetrated into the samples with measurable changes in composition. Only rain events were evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • de Pena, R.G., Walter, K.C., Lebowitz, L., Wicka, J.G.:“Wet deposition monitoring. - Effect of sampling period.” Atm. Environ. 19 (1985) 151 – 156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joss, J., Waldvogel, A.: “Ein Spektrograph für Niederschlagstropfen mit automatischer Auswertung”. PAGEOPH 68 (1967) 240 – 246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H.: “The importance of reducing sample contamination in routine monitoring of trace metals in atmospheric precipitation”. Atm. Environ. 20 (1986) 401 – 405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sisterson, D.L., Würfel, B.E., Lesht, B.M.: “Chemical differences between event and weekly precipitation samples in northeastern Illinois”. Atm. Environ. 19 (1985) 1453 – 1469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, P., Jobst S.: Comparison of various precipitation gauges and sensors for the determination of wet deposition. In: K. Grefen, J. Löbel (eds.). Environmental Meteorology, (1988) 193 – 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, P., Jobst, S., Harder, C: “Meteorologische Prüfung und Beurteilung von Sammelgeräten für die nasse Deposition”. Schluβbericht Proj. 07431073, GSF-Berichte, München, 1989

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winkler, P. (1990). Intercomparison of Wet-Only Collectors for Measuring Wet Deposition. In: Restelli, G., Angeletti, G. (eds) Physico-Chemical Behaviour of Atmospheric Pollutants. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0567-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0567-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6743-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0567-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics