Skip to main content

Adapting to Climate Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change and United States Forests

Part of the book series: Advances in Global Change Research ((AGLO,volume 57))

Abstract

Federal agencies have led the development of adaptation principles and tools in forest ecosystems over the past decade. Successful adaptation efforts generally require organizations to: (1) develop science-management partnerships, (2) provide education on climate change science, (3) provide a toolkit of methods and processes for vulnerability assessment and adaptation, (4) use multiple models to generate projections of climate change effects, (5) incorporate risk and uncertainty, (6) integrate with multiple management objectives, (7) prioritize no-regrets decision making, (8) support flexibility and adaptive learning, and (9) incorporate adaptation in planning and projects. Resistance, resilience, response, and realignment strategies help to identify the scope of appropriate adaptation options at broad spatial scales in forest ecosystems. At the local scale, it is necessary to: (1) define management objectives, spatial extent, and timeframes, (2) analyze vulnerabilities, (3) determine priorities, (4) develop local tactics associated with strategies, (5) implement plans and projects, and (6) monitor, review, and adjust. The best examples of vulnerability assessment and adaptation planning in forests have occurred in national forests, where science-management partnerships have been established across multiple institutions. Although strategic planning for adaptation has been increasing, implementation of on-the-ground adaptation projects has been rare, primarily because of a lack of budget, personnel, and mandate for action. No one agency or organization can fully meet the challenge of adaptation, but this task is within reach if willing partners work collaboratively toward sustainable management grounded in knowledge of climate science and dynamic ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aubry, C., Devine, W., Shoal, R., et al. (2011). Climate change and forest biodiversity: A vulnerability assessment and action plan for national forests in western Washington (310 p). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. http://ecoshare.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/CCFB.pdf

  • Bagne, K. E., Friggens, M. M., Finch, D. M. (2011). A system for assessing vulnerability of species (SAVS) to climate change (General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-257, 28 p). Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/37850

  • Baron, J. S., Allen, C. D., Fleishman, E., et al. (2008). National parks. In S. H. Julius & J. M. West (Eds.), Preliminary review of adaptation options for climate-sensitive ecosystems and resources: A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the subcommittee on Climate Change Research (pp. 4-1–4-68). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. S., Gunderson, L., Allen, C. D., et al. (2009). Options for national parks and reserves for adapting to climate change. Environmental Management, 44, 1033–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, P. R., Swanston, C. W., Janowiak, M. K., et al. (2012). Adaptation strategies and approaches. In C. W. Swanston & M. K. Janowiak (Eds.), Forest adaptation resources: Climate change tools and approaches for land managers (General Technical Report NRS-87, pp. 15–34). Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, T. R., Parry, M. L., Harasawa, H., & Nishioka, S. (1994). IPCC technical guidelines for assessing climate change impacts and adaptation. Working group 2 of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayan, D. R., Maurer, E. P., Dettinger, M. D., et al. (2008). Climate change scenarios for the California region. Climatic Change, 87, S21–S42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Island Climate Adaptation and Policy [CICAP]. (2009). A framework for climate change adaptation in Hawaii (30 p). Honolulu: State of Hawaii, Ocean Resources Management Plan Working Group; University of Hawaii, Center for Island Climate Adaptation and Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clean Air Act of 1970; 42 U.S.C. s/s 7401 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clean Water Act of 1977; 33 U.S.C. s/s 1251 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Climate Adaptation Knowledge Exchange [CAKE]. (2011). CAKE: Climate adaptation knowledge exchange. http://www.cakex.org. 28 Dec 2011.

  • Cole, D. N., & Yung, L. (2010). Beyond naturalness: Rethinking park and wilderness stewardship in an era of rapid change (304 p). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, J. A., & Forster, P. M. (2011). A balance between radiative forcing and climate feedback in the modeled 20th century temperature response. Journal of Geophysical Research, 116, D17108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, C., Conklin, D. R., & Unsworth, M. H. (2009). Local atmospheric decoupling in complex topography alters climate change impacts. International Journal of Climatology, 30, 1857–1864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, A. E., Morrison, J. F., Joyce, L. A., et al. (2012). Climate projections FAQ (General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-277WWW, 32 p). Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endangered Species Act of 1973 [ESA], 16 U.S.C. 1531–1536, 1538–1540.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESSA. (2011). Vegetation dynamics development tool (VDDT). http://essa.com/tools/vddt. 28 Dec 2011.

  • Exec. Order No. 13,514, 74 Fed. Reg. 194, 52117 (2009, October 8). Federal leadership in environmental, energy, and economic performance. http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ceq/sustainability. 28 Dec 2011.

  • Exline, J., Graber, D., Stephenson, N., et al. (2009). A strategic framework for science in support of management in the Southern Sierra Nevada ecoregion: A collaboratively developed approach (24 p). Three Rivers: Southern Sierra Nevada Ecoregion. http://www.nps.gov/seki/naturescience/upload/strategic-framework-2.pdf. 27 Dec 2011.

  • Furniss, M. J., Roby, K. B., Cenderelli, D., et al. (2013). Assessing the vulnerability of watersheds to climate change (General Technical Report PNW-GTR-884, 308 p). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furniss, M. J., Staab, B. P., Hazelhurst, S., et al. (2010). Water, climate change, and forests: Watershed stewardship for a changing climate (General Technical Report GTR-PNW-812, 75 p). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16, 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Stein, B. A., Edelson, N. A., (Eds.). (2011). Scanning the conservation horizon: A guide to climate change vulnerability assessment (176 p). Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation. http://www.nwf.org/vulnerabilityguide. 27 Dec 2011.

  • Halofsky, J. E., Peterson, D. L., O’Halloran, K. A., & Hawkins Hoffman, C. (2011). Adapting to climate change at Olympic National Forest and Olympic National Park (General Technical Report PNW-GTR-844, 130 p). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. A., Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E., & Aronson, J. (2006). Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology, 14, 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbrecht, L., Jackson, A., Speaks, P., co-chairs. (2011). Washington State climate change response strategy: Interim recommendations from Topic Advisory Group 3 on species, habitats and ecosystems. (Topic Advisory Group 3 interim report, February 2011, 95 p). Olympia: State of Washington, Department of Ecology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2001). Climate change 2001: Mitigation. Third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III (753 p). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. T. (2012). Conservation and resource management in a changing world: Extending historical range of variation beyond the baseline. In J. Wiens, C. Regan, G. Hayward, & H. Safford (Eds.), Historical environmental variation in conservation and natural resource management (pp. 92–110). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, R., Cook, K., Sandison, D., co-chairs. (2011). Washington state integrated climate change response strategy: Interim recommendations of the natural resources: Working lands and water topic advisory group. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/climatechange/2011TAGdocs/R2011_interimreport.pdf

  • Janowiak, M. K., Butler, P. R., Swanston, C. W., et al. (2011a). Adaptation workbook. In C. W. Swanston & M. K. Janowiak (Eds.), Forest adaptation resources: Climate change tools and approaches for land managers (General Technical Report NRS-87, pp. 35–56). Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowiak, M. K., Swanston, C. W., Nagel, L. M., et al. (2011b). Silvicultural decision-making in an uncertain climate future: A workshop-based exploration of considerations, strategies, and approaches (General Technical Report NRS-81, 14 p). Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, M., & Williamson, T. (2007). A framework for assessing climate change vulnerability of the Canadian forest sector. The Forestry Chronicle, 83, 358–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, L. A., Blate, G. M., Littell, J. S., et al. (2008). National forests. In S. H. Julius & J. M. West (Eds.), Preliminary review of adaptation options for climate-sensitive ecosystems and resources: A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Climate Change Research (pp. 3-1–3-127). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, L. A., Blate, G. M., McNulty, S. G., et al. (2009). Managing for multiple resources under climate change. Environmental Management, 44, 1022–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohm, K. A., Franklin, J. F., (Eds.). (1997). Creating a forestry for the 21st century: The science of ecosystem management (475 p). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackey, R. T. (1995). Seven pillars of ecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 40, 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, M., Maroschek, M., Netherer, S., et al. (2010). Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 698–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell, J. S., & Peterson, D. L. (2005). A method for estimating vulnerability of Douglas-fir growth to climate change in the northwestern U.S. The Forestry Chronicle, 81, 369–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell, J. S., Oneil, E. E., McKenzie, D., et al. (2010). Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climatic change in Washington State, USA. Climatic Change, 102, 129–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell, J. S., Peterson, D. L., Millar, C. I., & O’Halloran, K. A. (2011). U.S. National forests adapt to climate change through science-management partnerships. Climatic Change, 110, 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margoluis, R., Salafsky, N. (1998). Measures of success: Designing, managing, and monitoring conservation and development projects (384 p). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, E. M., Littell, J., Whitely Binder, L., (Eds.). (2009). The Washington climate change impacts assessment (414 p). Seattle: University of Washington, Center for Science in the Earth System, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans, Climate Impacts Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, D., Pedlar, J., & O’Neill, G. (2009). Climate change and forest seed zones: Past trends, future prospects and challenges to ponder. The Forestry Chronicle, 85, 258–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, J. S., Hellmann, J. J., & Schwart, M. W. (2007). A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conservation Biology, 21, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., Pan, J., (Eds.). (2001). Climate change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (700 p). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, C. I., Stephenson, N. L., & Stephens, S. L. (2007). Climate change and forests of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications, 17, 2145–2151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly, P. C. D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., et al. (2008). Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, 319, 573–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota Forest Resources Council [MFRC]. (2011). Landscape management documents. http://www.frc.state.mn.us/resources_documents_landscape.html. 28 Dec 2011.

  • Morelli, T. L., McGlinchy, M. C., & Neilson, R. P. (2011a). A climate change primer for land managers: An example from the Sierra Nevada (Research Paper PSW-RP-262, 44 p). Albany: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morelli, T. L., Yeh, S., Smith, N., et al. (2011b). Climate project screening tool: An aid for climate change adaptation (Research Paper PSW-RP-263, 29 p). Albany: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S. C., & Luers, A. L. (2008). Managing climate risks in California: The need to engage resource managers for successful adaptation to change. Climatic Change, 87, S309–S322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 [NEPA]; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Forest Management Act of 1976 [NFMA]. (1976). Act of October 22, 1976; 16 U.S.C. 1600.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service [NPS]. (2010). Climate change response strategy: Science, adaptation, mitigation, communication (26 p). Fort Collins/Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Climate Change Response Program/U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Committee on Abrupt Climate Change. (2002). Abrupt climate change: Inevitable surprises (230 p). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitschke, C. R., & Innes, J. L. (2008). Integrating climate change into forest management in south-central British Columbia: An assessment of landscape vulnerability and development of a climate-smart framework. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North Carolina State University [NCSU]. (2011). TACCIMO: Template for assessing climate change impacts and management options. http://www.sgcp.ncsu.edu:8090

  • North Cascadia Adaptation Partnership. (2011). North Cascadia Adaptation Partnership: Preparing for climate change through science-management collaboration. http://northcascadia.org

  • Northern Arizona University [NAU]. (2011). Tribes and climate change. http://www4.nau.edu/tribalclimatechange

  • Nydick, K., & Sydoriak, C. (2011). The strategic framework for science in support of management in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California. Park Science, 28, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overpeck, J., & Udall, B. (2010). Dry times ahead. Science, 328, 1642–1643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Forest Trust [PFT]. (2011). Working forests, winning climates. http://www.pacificforest.org/Working-Forests-Winning-Climate.html. 27 Dec 2011.

  • Peterson, D. L., Parker, V. T., (Eds.). (1998). Ecological scale: Theory and applications (608 p). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. L., Millar, C. I., Joyce, L. A., et al. (2011). Responding to climate change on national forests: A guidebook for developing adaptation options (General Technical Report PNW-GTR-855, 109 p). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, K. M., & Crane, B. S. (2010). Assessing forest tree genetic risk across the southern Appalachians: A tool for conservation decision-making in changing times. http://www.forestthreats.org/current-projects/project-summaries/genetic-risk-assessment-system.

  • Raymond, C. L., Peterson, D. L., & Rochefort, R. M. (2013). The North Cascadia adaptation partnership: A science-management collaboration for responding to climate change. Sustainability, 5, 136–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi, A., & Simberloff, D. (2009). Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 248–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J., Tredennick, A., & Joyce, L. A. (2012). Climate change on the Shoshone National Forest, Wyoming: A synthesis of past climate, climate projections, and ecosystem implications (General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-264, 60 p). Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K. A. (2010). Tribal climate change adaptation options: A review of the scientific literature (86 p). Seattle: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., & McBoyle, G. (2007). Climate change adaptation in the ski industry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12, 1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., McBoyle, G., Minogue, A., & Mills, B. (2006). Climate change and the sustainability of ski-based tourism in Eastern North America: A reassessment. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 14, 376–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo, R. (2010). Adaptation of forests to climate change: Some estimates (Discussion Paper RFF DP 10-06, 51 p). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppälä, R., Buck, A., & Katila, P. (Eds.). (2009a). Adaptation of forests and people to climate change: A global assessment report (IUFRO world series, 224 p, Vol. 22). Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppälä, R., Buck, A., & Katila, P. (Eds.). (2009b). Making forest lands fit for climate change: A global view of climate-change impacts on forests and people and options for adaptation (Policy brief, 39 p). Helsinki: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland: International Union of Forest Research Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snover, A., Whitley Binder, L., Lopez, J., Willmott, E., Kay, J., Howell, D., Simmonds, J. (2007). Preparing for climate change: A guidebook for local, regional, and state governments (172 p). Oakland: In association with and published by ICLEI–Local Governments for Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S., Quin, D., Manning, M. et al., (Eds.). (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (996 p) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A., Birdsey, R., Joyce, R., Hayes, J. (2009). Forest Service global change research strategy overview, 2009–2019. FS-917a (18 p). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Research and Development. http://www.fs.fed.us/climatechange/documents/global-change-strategy.pdf

  • Spittlehouse, D. L. (2005). Integrating climate change adaptation into forest management. The Forestry Chronicle, 81, 691–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, N. L., & Millar, C. I. (2012). Climate change: Wilderness’ greatest challenge. Park Science, 28, 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanston, C. W., & Janowiak, M. K. (2012). Forest adaptation resources: Climate change tools and approaches for land managers (General Technical Report NRS-87, 121 p). Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanston, C. W., Janowiak, M., Iverson, L., et al. (2011). Ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: A report from the climate change response framework project in northern Wisconsin (General Technical Report NRS-82, 142 p). Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanston, C. W., Janowiak, M. K., & Butler, P. R. (2012). Climate change response framework overview. In C. W. Swanston & M. K. Janowiak (Eds.), Forest adaptation resources: Climate change tools and approaches for land managers (General Technical Report NRS-87, pp. 8–14). Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinomish Indian Tribal Community [SITC]. (2010). Swinomish climate change initiative: Climate adaptation action plan (144 p). La Conner: Swinomish Tribal Community, Office of Planning and Community Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapash Sustainable Forest Collaborative. (2010). The Tapash sustainable forest collaborative: Collaborative forest landscape restoration program. http://www.tapash.org/cflra.htm. 27 Dec 2011.

  • The Nature Conservancy [TNC]. (2011a). Climate Wizard. http://www.climatewizard.org. 28 Dec 2011.

  • The Nature Conservancy [TNC]. (2011b). NaturePeopleFuture.org: TNC’s knowledge base for climate change adaptation. http://www.naturepeoplefuture.org. 28 Dec 2011.

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. (2008). Forest Service strategic framework for responding to climate change (Version 1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://www.fs.fed.us/climatechange/documents/strategic-framework-climate-change-1-0.pdf

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. (2011a). Climate Change Resource Center (CCRC). http://www.fs.fed.us/ccrc

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. (2011b). National roadmap for responding to climate change. FS-957B (32 p). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://www.fs.fed.us/climatechange/pdf/roadmapfinal.pdf

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. (2011c, August). Navigating the performance scorecard: A guide for national forests and grasslands (Version 2) (104 p). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://www.fs.fed.us/climatechange/advisor/scorecard/scorecard-guidance-08-2011.pdf. 27 Dec 2011.

  • U.S. Department of the Interior [DOI]. (2009). Secretarial order no. 3289. Addressing the impacts of climate change on America’s water, land, and other natural and cultural resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service [DOI FWS]. (2011, March). Landscape conservation cooperatives: Shared science for a sustainable future. Fact sheet. http://www.fws.gov/science/shc/pdf/LCC_Fact_Sheet.pdf

  • U.S. Global Change Research Program [USGCRP]. (2011). The United States national climate assessment: Uses of vulnerability assessments for the national climate assessment (NCA Report Series, vol 9). http://downloads.globalchange.gov/nca/workshop-reports/vulnerability-assessments-workshop-report.pdf

  • Walters, C. (1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources (374 p). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington State Department of Ecology. (2012). Preparing for a changing climate: Washington state’s integrated climate response strategy. Olympia: Washington State Department of Ecology, Climate Policy Group. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/climatechange/ipa_responsestrategy.htm

  • Weeks, D., Malone, P., & Welling, L. (2011). Climate change scenario planning: A tool for managing parks into uncertain futures. Park Science, 28, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Governors Association [WGA]. (2009). Supporting the integration of climate change adaptation science in the West (Policy Resolution 09-2, 3 p). Denver: Western Governors’ Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western Governors Association [WGA]. (2010). Climate adaptation priorities for the western states: Scoping report (20 p). Denver: Western Governors Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A., & Bachelet, D. E. (2010). Matching the multiple scales of conservation with the multiple scales of climate change. Conservation Biology, 24, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Peterson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Millar, C.I., Swanston, C.W., Peterson, D.L. (2014). Adapting to Climate Change. In: Peterson, D., Vose, J., Patel-Weynand, T. (eds) Climate Change and United States Forests. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 57. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7515-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics