Skip to main content

An Investigation into the Use of Concept Cartoons in the Teaching of “Metals and the Reactivity Series” at the Secondary Level

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chemistry: The Key to our Sustainable Future

Abstract

The present study was designed in an attempt to promote argumentation, and to enhance students’ engagement and understanding during the teaching of “Metals and the Reactivity Series” by making use of concept cartoons. The research was carried out in a Girls’ State Secondary School situated in the North of Mauritius. The sample comprised 35 Form III students (age 13–14 years), who were in the third year of secondary schooling. The study was based on an action research, during which concept cartoons were used in the teaching of “Metals and the Reactivity Series”. Four different data-collection tools were used during the study, namely, observation checklists, students’ achievement tests, students’ questionnaire, and a semi-structured interview. Our findings have revealed that the use of concept cartoons in the teaching of “Metals and the Reactivity Series” has promoted both teacher-student and student-student interactions. Moreover, concept cartoons have proved to be very effective in eliciting students’ interest, and in motivating them to participate during the lessons through discussions and argumentations. Most importantly, our findings have clearly indicated that concept cartoons can serve as stepping stones to improve students’ understanding and performance by helping teachers to identify their problems and misconceptions. It has also been found that concept cartoons depicting different viewpoints, or those including both correct and incorrect statements, have not only helped in engaging learners in argumentation, but have also promoted thinking. The study has also brought to light that it is important for teachers to include a gamut of statements, ranging from simple to more challenging ones, while designing concept cartoons in order to cater for students of different abilities. We also report here that concept cartoons can be used as teaching tools in conjunction with various strategies, like hands-on practical, demonstration, video-viewing and group work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barnhart CL, Barnhar RK (1992) The World book dictionary, vol 2. World Book, Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  2. Randi J, cited in: Wudka J (1998) From Antiquity to Einstein. http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node5.html. Accessed 19 Apr 2012

  3. Wudka J (1998) From Antiquity to Einstein. http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node6.html#SECTION02121000000000000000. Accessed 19 Apr 2012

  4. Rutherford FJ, Ahlgren A (1990) Science for all Americans. Oxford. Cited in: Backer PR (1998) What is the scientific method? http://www.engr.sjsu.edu/pabacker/scientific_method.htm. Accessed 19 Apr 2012

  5. Driver R, Squires A, Rushworth P, Wood-Robinson V (1994) Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. http://edutech.csun.edu/eduwiki/index.php/Driver_et_al,_1994. Accessed 19 Apr 2012

  6. Wellington JJ, Osborne J (2001) Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  7. La Velle BL, Erduran S (2007) Argument and developments in the science curriculum. Sch Sci Rev 88:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. Newton P, Driver R, Osborne J (1999) The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. Int J Sci Educ 21:553–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erduran S, Jimenez-Aleixandre MP (2008) Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer, Dordrecht. Cited in: Erduran S, Villamanan R (2009) Cool argument: engineering students’ written arguments about thermodynamics in the context of the Peltier effect in refrigeration. Educación Química 20:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erduran S (2007) Breaking the law: promoting domain-specificity in chemical education in the context of arguing about the periodic law. Found Chem 9:247–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bybee RW, Powell JC, Trowbridge LW (2008) Teaching secondary school science. Strategies for developing scientific literacy, 9th edn. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Columbus, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gray A (1997) Constructivist teaching and learning; SSTA research centre report #97–07: http://saskschoolboards.ca/research/instruction/97-07.htm#What%20is%20Constructivism. Accessed 13 Mar 2012

  13. General Teaching Council for England (2011) Teaching & Learning Academy. Case study 4: using concept cartoons in science. http://www.gtce.org.uk/tla/rft/sciencetalk0411/case_studies/cs4/. Accessed 13 Mar 2012

  14. Mauritius Research Council (2004) Teaching and learning of science in schools (Republic of Mauritius), vol 1. Recommendations and Action Plan (2004–2006). Republic of Mauritius

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luckpoteea M, Narod F (2012) An investigation into the use of the concept attainment model in teaching the “Periodic Table” at ‘O’-Level through an action research. In: Bhowon MG, Jhaumeer-Laulloo S, Li Kam Wah H, Ramasami P (eds) Chemistry for sustainable development. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, pp 265–300

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chuckowree V (2005) The use of pedagogical aids in the teaching of periodic table at form five level, an action research. PGCE Dissertation, Mauritius Institute of Education, Réduit

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sobron S (2008) Use of games in the learning of periodic table at form four level, an action research. B.Ed. Dissertation, University of Mauritius and Mauritius Institute of Education, Réduit

    Google Scholar 

  18. Birisçi S, Metin M (2010) Developing an instructional material using a concept cartoon adapted to the 5E model: a sample of teaching erosion. Asia-Pac Forum Sci Learn Teach 11:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  19. Driver R, Bell B (1986) Students’ thinking and the learning of science: a constructivist view. Sch Sci Rev 67:443–456

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kabapinar F (2005) Effectiveness of teaching via concept cartoons from the point of view of constructivist approach. Educ Sci Theory Pract 5:135–146

    Google Scholar 

  21. Keogh B, Naylor S (1996) Teaching and learning in science: a new perspective. Paper presented at the BERA Conference, Lancaster. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/000000115.htm. Accessed 13 Jan 2012

  22. Naylor S, Keogh B (2012) Concept cartoons: what have we learnt? Paper presented at the Fibonacci Project European Conference, Inquiry-Based science and mathematics education: bridging the gap between education research and practice. Leicester. http://search.conduit.com/results.aspx?q=Keogh+%26+Naylor%2C+1993&Suggest=&stype=Results&FollowOn=True&SelfSearch=1&SearchType=SearchWeb&SearchSource=1&ctid=ct1060933&octid =CT1060933. Accessed 21 June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  23. Naylor S, Keogh B (2000) Concept cartoons in science education (The ConCISE Project). Milligate House Publishers, Sandbach, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bogdan R, Biklen SK (1998) Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods, 3rd edn. Pearson, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dabell J (2004) The maths coordinator’s file-using concept cartoons. PFP Publishing. Cited in: Birisçi S, Metin M (2010) Developing an instructional material using a concept cartoon adapted to the 5E model: a sample of teaching erosion. Asia-Pac Forum Sci Learn Teach 11:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kabapinar F (2009) What makes concept cartoons more effective? Using research to inform practice. Educ Sci 34:104–118

    Google Scholar 

  27. Allibacus A (2008) Use of concept cartoons as a strategy to teach acids and bases at Form II level. An action research. PGCE Dissertation. Mauritius Institute of Education, Réduit

    Google Scholar 

  28. Keogh B, Naylor S (1999) Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: an evaluation. Int J Sci Educ 21:431–446. Cited in: Kabapinar F (2009) What makes concept cartoons more effective? Using research to inform practice. Education and Science 34:104–118

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sing Teach (2009) Cartoons in the classroom. Sing Teach 18:6–7. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University. http://singteach.nie.edu.sg/science-ed/100.html. Accessed 1 Aug 2012

    Google Scholar 

  30. Furrer C, Skinner E (2003) Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. J Educ Psychol 95:148–162. Cited in: Toshalis E, Nakkula MJ (2012) Motivation, engagement, and student voice: the students at the centre series. Jobs for the future. http://www.studentsatthecenter.org/sites/scl.dl-dev.com/files/Motivation%20Engagement%20Student%20Voice_0.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fawzia B. Narod .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lallbeeharry, H., Narod, F.B. (2014). An Investigation into the Use of Concept Cartoons in the Teaching of “Metals and the Reactivity Series” at the Secondary Level. In: Gupta Bhowon, M., Jhaumeer-Laulloo, S., Li Kam Wah, H., Ramasami, P. (eds) Chemistry: The Key to our Sustainable Future. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7389-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics