Skip to main content

Short Review of the Missing Links in Teacher Research Models for Educational Technology Acceptance in Literature

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The 2nd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

  • 1481 Accesses

Abstract

Several studies have investigated the adoption of information technology by teachers in the educational setting. However, certain missing links were identified in the gap between the actual teacher adoption and research findings. This situation is particularly true for college teachers because compared with K1–K12 teachers, college teachers generally have more freedom to decide whether to adopt the educational technologies. The goal of this research is to explore specific missing links to address the gap between research findings and observed practice in reality. Several findings are critically analyzed in this paper for the future enhancement of theoretical models and empirical research related to the acceptance of educational technologies by college teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manage Inf Syst 19(4):9–30

    Google Scholar 

  2. King RR, He J (2007) A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage 43:740–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sumak B, Hericko M, Pusnik M (2011) A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: the role of user types and e-learning technology type. Comput Hum Behav 27:2067–2077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q 19(2):213–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ajzen I (1985) From intention to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J (eds) Action-control: from cognition to behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 11–39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liaw S, Chang W, Hung W, Huang W (2006) Attitudes toward search engines as a learning assisted tool: approach of Liaw and Huang’s research model. Comput Hum Behav 22(2):177–190

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q 25(3):351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M (1990) The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zigurs I, Buckland B, Connolly J, Wilson EV (1999) A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems. Data Base Adv Inf Syst 30(3, 4):34–50

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lai H-M, Chen C-P (2011) Factors influencing secondary school teachers’ adoption of teaching blogs? Comput Educ 56:948–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Straub DW Jr, Burton-Jones A (2007) Veni, vidi, vici: breaking the TAM logjam. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(4):223–229

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abrami PC, Poulsen C, Chambers B (2004) Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educ Psychol Int J Exp Educ Psychol 24(2):201–216

    Google Scholar 

  16. Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manage Rev 10:76–89

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brunetto Y, Farr-Wharton R, Ramsay S, Shacklock K (2010) Supervisor relationships and perceptions of work—family conflict. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 48:212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Allen TD, Herst C, Bruck C, Sutton M (2000) Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: a review and agenda for future research. J Occup Health Psychol 5(2):278–308

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bruck C, Allen T, Spector P (2002) The relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction: a finer grained analysis. J Vocat Behav 60:336–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frye K, Breaugh J (2004) Family-friendly policies, supervisor support, work—family conflict, family—work conflict, and satisfaction: a test of a conceptual model. J Bus Psychol 19(2):197–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Luk D, Shaffer M (2005) Work and family domain stressors and support: within- and crossdomain influences on work–family conflict. J Occup Organ Psychol 78(4):489–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scandura T, Lankau M (1997) Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. J Organ Behav 18(4):377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vega A, Gilbert M (1997) Longer days, shorter weeks: compressed work weeks in policing. Public Pers Manage 26(3):391–403

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kossek E, Ozeki C (1998) Work–family conflict, policies and the job-life satisfaction relationship: a review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. J Appl Psychol 83(2):139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bohle P, Tilley AJ (1998) Early experiences of shift work: influences on attitudes. J Occup Organ Psychol 71(1):61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Netemeyer RG, Boles JS, McMurrian R (1996) Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. J Appl Psychol 81:400–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harris KJ, Marett K, Harris RB (2011) Technology-related pressure and work-family conflict: main effects and an examination of moderating variables. J Appl Soc Psychol 41(9):2077–2103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Frone MR, Russell M, Cooper ML (1997) Relation of work—family conflict to health outcomes: a four-year longitudinal study of employed parents. J Occup Organ Psychol 70:325–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eby LT, Casper WJ, Lockwood A, Bordeaux C, Brinley A (2005) Work and family research in IO/OB: content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). J Vocat Behav 66:124–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Grandey AA, Cropanzano R (1999) The conservation of resources model applied to work—family conflict and strain. J Vocat Behav 54:350–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Appel J, Kim-Appel D (2008) Family systems at work: the relationship between family coping and employee burnout. Fam J 16(3):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Andreassi JK (2011) What the person brings to the table: personality, coping, and work-family conflict. J Fam Issues 32(11):1474–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Blanch A, Aluja A (2012) Social support (family and supervisor), work-family conflict, and burnout: Sex differences. Hum Relat 65(7):811–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fornell C (1992) A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience. J Mark 56:6–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jones MA, Mothersbaugh DL, Betty SE (2000) Switching barriers and repurchase intentions in services. J Retail 76:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Woisetschlager DM, Lentz P, Evanschitzky H (2011) How habits, social ties, and economic switching barriers affect customer loyalty in contractual service settings. J Bus Res 64(8):800–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bendapudi N, Berry LL (1997) Customers’ motivations for maintaining relationships with service providers. J Retail 73:15–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim WG, Lee C, Hiemstra SJ (2004) Effects of an online virtual community on customer loyalty and travel product purchases. Tourism Manage 25:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Macmillan, NY

    Google Scholar 

  40. Heide JB, Allen MW (1995) Vendor consideration and switching behavior for buyers in high-technology markets. J Mark 59(3):30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wathne KH, Biong H, Heide JB (2001) Choice of supplier in embedded markets: relationship and marketing program effects. J Mark 65:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Thompson RL, Cats-Baril WL (2002) Information technology and management. Mc Graw-Hill Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  43. Farrell J, Klemperer P (2007) Coordination and lock-in: competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook of industrial organization 2(5):1967–2072

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project is sponsored by National Science Council of the Republic of China under Grant No. NSC-100-2410-H390-009-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Hui Tao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tao, YH. (2014). Short Review of the Missing Links in Teacher Research Models for Educational Technology Acceptance in Literature. In: Uden, L., Tao, YH., Yang, HC., Ting, IH. (eds) The 2nd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7308-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics