Abstract
The increasingly widespread use of x-rays in diagnostic and interventional radiology provides not only enormous benefits to patients, but also significant radiation exposure for populations. The protection of patients against potential radiation harm requires the elimination of all unnecessary and unintended x-ray exposure in relation to effective clinical diagnosis. Dosimetry is an essential management tool for patient safety by allowing the assessment of typical radiation risks in support of the justification of procedures, and the routine monitoring and comparison of typical doses in pursuit of the optimization of patient protection. Periodic assessment of patient doses should form an integral part of quality assurance in x-ray facilities and is best based on practical measurements that provide useful characterization of patient exposure, such as entrance surface dose, dose-area product and, for CT, weighted CT dose index and dose-length product. In addition, the monitoring of cumulative dose during complex interventional procedures underpins the effective management of potential tissue reactions. Mean values determined for practical dose monitoring quantities in a facility for each type of procedure and patient group can form the basis not only for estimates of typical organ and effective doses utilizing appropriate coefficients, but also local diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). DRLs represent a pragmatic mechanism for promoting continuing improvement in performance by facilitating comparison with national values and practice elsewhere. The application of DRLs in the UK over the last 25 years, within a coherent framework for patient protection, has successfully helped to reduce unnecessary exposures, with national DRLs for many procedures falling by a factor of two.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Report No 204: size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park
American College of Radiology (2008) ACR practice guidelines for diagnostic reference levels in medical x-ray imaging. American College of Radiology, Reston
Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL et al (2010) Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology 254(2):326–341
Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (2007) 12th Report: The impact of personally initiated x-ray computed tomography scanning for the health assessment of asymptomatic individuals. Health Protection Agency, Chilton
Council of the European Union (1997) Council Directive 97/43/Euratom of 30 June 1997 on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionizing radiation in relation to medical exposure. Off J Eur Commun L180:22
Department of Health (2000) The ionizing radiation [Medical Exposure] regulations 2000 (IR(M)ER). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-of-health. Accessed 26 May 2012
Department of Health (2007) Guidance on the establishment and use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-of-health. Accessed 26 May 2012
European ALARA Network (2007) The diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Europe. http://www.eu-alara.net/. Accessed 26 May 2012
European Commission (2008) Radiation protection 154. European guidance on estimating population doses from medical X-ray procedures. EU publications office. http://ddmed.eu/_media/background_of_ddm1:rp154.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2012
Hart D, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC (2012) Report HPA-CRCE-034: doses to patients from radiographic and fluoroscopic x-ray imaging procedures in the UK – 2010 review. Health Protection Agency, Chilton
Hart D, Wall BF, Hillier MC et al (2010) Report HPA-CRCE-012: frequency and collective dose for medical and dental x-ray examinations in the UK, 2008. Health Protection Agency, Chilton
International Atomic Energy Agency (2007) Technical reports series 457: dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: an international code of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
International Commission on Radiological Protection (1996) ICRP publication 73: radiological protection and safety in medicine. Ann ICRP 26(2)
International Commission on Radiological Protection (2000) ICRP publication 85: avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 30(2)
International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP publication 103: the 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP 37(2–4):1–332
International Commission on Radiological Protection (2012) ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs (threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context). Ann ICRP 41(1–2):1–322
International Commission on Radiological Protection (2013) ICRP publication 120: radiological protection in cardiology. Ann ICRP 42(1):1–125
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (2005) ICRU Report 74: patient dosimetry for x rays used in medical imaging. J ICRU 5(2)
Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (2004) Report 88: guidance on the establishment and use of diagnostic reference levels for medical x-ray examinations. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York
Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (2005) Report 91: recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic x-ray imaging systems. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, York
Jansen JTM, Shrimpton PC (2009) Calculation of normalized organ doses for pediatric patients undergoing CT examinations on four types of CT scanner. In: Dössel O, Schlegel WC (eds) Proceedings of world congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering
Jansen JTM, Shrimpton PC (2011) Calculation of normalized organ and effective doses to adult reference computational phantoms from contemporary computed tomography scanners. Prog Nuc Sci Technol 2:165–171
National Research Council of the National Academies (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. Biological effects of ionizing radiation (BEIR) VII phase 2. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Report 160: ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2010) Report 168: radiation dose management for fluoroscopically-guided interventional medical procedures. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2012) Report 172: reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: recommendations for the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda
National Radiological Protection Board (1992) IPSM/NRPB/CoR national protocol for patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton
Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA et al (2005) Report NRPB-W67: doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK – 2003 review. Health Protection Agency, Chilton
Shrimpton PC, Wall BF and Hillier MC (1989) Suggested guideline doses for medical x-ray examinations. Radiation protection – theory and practice. In: Goldfinch EP (ed) Proceedings of 4th international symposium of the society for radiological protection, Institute of Physics, Bristol, 4–9 June 1989
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2008) Effects of ionizing radiation – volume 1. UNSCEAR 2006 report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. United Nations, New York
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2010) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation – volume 1. UNSCEAR 2008 report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. United Nations, New York
Wall BF, Haylock R, Jansen JTM et al (2011) Report HPA-CRCE-028: radiation risks from medical x-ray examinations as a function of the age and sex of the patient. Health Protection Agency, Chilton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shrimpton, P.C., Ng, KH. (2014). Dose Assessment in the Management of Patient Protection in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. In: Lau, L., Ng, KH. (eds) Radiological Safety and Quality. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7256-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7256-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7255-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7256-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)