Skip to main content

Radiological Safety and Quality: Paradigms in Leadership and Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radiological Safety and Quality
  • 1822 Accesses

Abstract

Radiation medicine and medical imaging save lives and are indispensible in patient-centered care. In many parts of the world access to these procedures is poor, while in others utilization has increased significantly. Increased utilization, appropriate or inappropriate, increases cost and population exposure. From a public health perspective, procedure use should be rational and be guided by quality, safety, and appropriateness; aiming to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks.

Appropriateness and safety, including radiation safety, are key quality elements. The stakeholders in daily practice are the patients, referrers, providers and payers. These and others have delivered many actions to improve quality in different settings, addressing healthcare system, facility and end-user needs.

This chapter outlines the emerging challenges threatening radiological quality and radiation safety and discusses the solutions for healthcare systems, facilities and end-users. Good teamwork and an integrated framework would overcome many of these challenges. An action framework consisting of quality and safety measures, synergistic implementation strategies, and performance enhancements is presented. Recommendations and guidance tools are used to improve practice by indicating the requirements and processes. Each stakeholder plays a unique and complementary role in the development, advocacy, adoption and use of recommendations and tools.

The goal is to do the right procedure by justification and to do the procedure right by optimization and error minimization in daily practice. To bridge the gap between evidence and practice requires an innovative approach, leadership from authorities, collaboration with stakeholders, and participation of end-users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American College of Radiology (2012) General radiology improvement database (GRID). http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  2. American College of Radiology and Radiological Society of North America (2013) RadiologyInfo. http://www.radiologyinfo.org/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  3. Autorité de sûreté nucléaire (2012) http://www.french-nuclear-safety.fr. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  4. Blachar A, Tal S, Mandel A et al (2006) Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of radiology guidelines. J Am Coll Radiol 3(11):851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackmore CC (2007) Defining quality in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 4(4):217–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackmore CC, Mecklenburg RS, Kaplan GS (2011) Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 8(1):19–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. College of Radiology, Academy of Medicine of Malaysia (2013) The CoR Mammogram Program (CMP). http://www.radiologymalaysia.org/breasthealth/smp/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  8. Council of the European Union (2010) The high contracting parties of EURATOM (1957), consolidated version of the treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community. Off J Eur Union (OJEU) 2010/C 84/01

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crick M, Shannoun F, Le Heron J et al (2010) Opportunities to improve the global assessment of medical radiation exposures. In: International conference on radiation protection in medicine, Varna, Bulgaria

    Google Scholar 

  10. Destouet JM, Bassett LW, Yaffe MJ et al (2005) The ACR’s mammography accreditation program: ten years of experience since MQSA. J Am Coll Radiol 2(7):585–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon AK, Fitzgerald R (2008) Outsourcing and teleradiology: potential benefits, risks and solutions from a UK/European perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 5(1):12–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Duszak R (2009) P4P: pragmatic for practice. J Am Coll Radiol 6:477–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. European Commission (2009) Radiation protection no 159: European commission guidelines on clinical audit for medical radiological practices (Diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine and radiotherapy). Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  14. European Medical ALARA Network. http://www.eman-network.eu/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  15. European Society of Radiology (2010) ESR Position on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare (Spanish Presidency compromise paper). http://www.myesr.org/html/img/pool/20100713_ESR_Position_Cross_border_healthcare_directive_Final.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  16. Flin R, O’Connor P, Crichton M (2008) Safety at the sharp end: a guide to non-technical skills. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frush DP, Denham CR, Goske KJ et al (2012) Radiation protection and dose monitoring in medical imaging: a Journey from awareness, through accountability, ability and action…but where will we arrive? J Patient Saf (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11(2):88–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Galloway H, Hibbert P, Agar A (2009) Radiology events register progress report – second phase. http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/quality-a-safety/qudi/past-projects/quality-services-accredited-providers. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  20. Golding SJ, Webster P, Dixon AK (2010) Impact of a clinical governance programme on reporting standards in MRI: findings of the national service in outsourced MRI. In: Proceedings of UK radiological congress 2010, BJR congress series. http://bjr.birjournals.org/site/misc/Proceed_2010.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  21. Heads of European Radiological protection Competent Authorities. http://www.herca.org/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  22. Hendee WR (2013) Risk of medical imaging. Med Phys 40(4):040401. doi:10.1118/1.4794923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ho E (2012) Social radiology: where to now? Biomed Imaging Interv J 8(1):e9. doi:10.2349/biij.8.1.e9

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Image Gently (2012) The alliance for radiation safety in paediatric imaging. http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  25. Image Wisely (2012) Radiation safety in adult medical imaging. http://www.imagewisely.org. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  26. Institute of Medicine (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  27. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  28. International Atomic Energy Agency (2011) Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards – Interim Edition. IAEA safety standards series GSR part 3 (Interim), IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  29. International Atomic Energy Agency (2012a) Safety in radiological procedures (SAFRAD). https://rpop.iaea.org/SAFRAD/About.aspx. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  30. International Atomic Energy Agency (2012b) International conference on radiation protection in medicine – setting the scene for the next Decade. http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2012/workerprotection.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  31. International Atomic Energy Agency (2013) Radiation protection of patients. https://rpop.iaea.org/RPoP/RPoP/Content/index.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  32. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2001) Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. Ann ICRP 31(4):33–52

    Google Scholar 

  33. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP publication 105. Radiation protection in medicine. Ann ICRP 37(6):1–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP publication 103. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP 37(2–4):1–332

    Google Scholar 

  35. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2009) ICRP publication 113. Education and training in radiological protection for diagnostic and interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 39(5):7–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2013) ICRP publication 121. Radiological protection in pediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP 42(2):1–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. International Radiation Protection Association (2012) Radiation protection culture. http://www.irpa.net/index.php/radiation-protection-culture.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  38. International Radiology Quality Network (2010) Referral guidelines project. http://www.irqn.org/work/referral-guidelines.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  39. International Radiology Quality Network (2012) Principles of international clinical teleradiology http://www.irqn.org/work/teleradiology.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  40. Jacob P (2012) Uncertainties of cancer risks estimates for applications of ionizing radiation in medicine. In: International conference on radiation protection in medicine – setting the scene for the next decade, IAEA, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  41. Järvinen H (2011) Clinical auditing and quality assurance. A refresher course lecture. In: Proceedings of the third European IRPA congress 2010. http://www.irpa2010europe.com/proceedings.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  42. Järvinen H, Alanen A, Ahonen A et al (2011) Guidance on internal audits and self-assessments: support to external clinical audits. In: Proceedings of the conference of the Nordic society of radiation protection (NSFS). http://nsfs.org/NSFS-2011/documents/session-07/S7-O1.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  43. Kawooya MG, Goldberg BB, De Groot W et al (2010) Evaluation of US training for the past 6 years at ECUREI, the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) Centre of Excellence, Kampala. Uganda Acad Radiol 17(3):392–398

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kenny LM, Lau LSW (2008) Editorial: clinical teleradiology – the purpose of principles. Med J Aust 188(4):197–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Klein LW, Miller DL, Goldstein J, on behalf of the Multispecialty Occupational Health Group et al (2011) The catheterization laboratory and interventional vascular suite of the future: anticipating innovations in design and function. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77(3):447–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kopans DB (2007) Breast imaging. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lau LSW (2006) A continuum of quality improvement in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 3(4):233–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lau LSW (2006) Clinical teleradiology in Australia: practice and standards. J Am Coll Radiol 3(5):377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lau LS (2007) The design and implementation of the RANZCR/NATA accreditation program for Australian radiology practices. J Am Coll Radiol 4(10):730–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lau LSW (2007) The Australian national quality program in diagnostic imaging and interventional radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 4(11):849–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lau LSW, Perez MR, Applegate KE et al (2011) Global quality imaging: emerging issues. J Am Coll Radiol 8(7):508–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lau LSW, Perez MR, Applegate KE et al (2011) Global quality imaging: improvement actions. J Am Coll Radiol 8(5):330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Luxenburg O, Vaknin S, Polak G et al (2004) Annual research report. The Israel National Institute for Health Policy and Health Service Research (Hebrew)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Medical Radiation Protection Education and Training MEDRAPET. http://www.medrapet.eu/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  55. MELODI Multidisciplinary European Low Dose Initiative. http://www.melodi-online.eu/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  56. Miller D (ed) (2005) Innovation series 2005: going lean in health care. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  57. Moore VA, Allen B Jr, Campbell SC et al (2005) Report of the ACR task force on international teleradiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2(2):121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Moray N (2000) Culture, politics and ergonomics. Ergonomics 43(7):858–868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Müller W (2012) Can we attribute health effects to medical radiation exposure? In: International conference on radiation protection in medicine – setting the scene for the next Decade. IAEA, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  60. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009) Report no.160 Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. NCRP, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  61. National Institute of Health (2009) New diagnostic imaging devices at the NIH clinical center to automatically record radiation exposure. http://www.nih.gov/news/health/aug2009/cc-17.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  62. National Quality Forum (2010a) Safe practice 34: pediatric imaging. In: Safe practices for better healthcare – 2010 Update: a consensus report. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  63. National Quality Forum (2010b) Safe practices for better healthcare – 2010 Update: a consensus report. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  64. National Research Council (2012) Tracking radiation exposure from medical diagnostic procedures: workshop report. Committee on tracking radiation doses from medical diagnostic procedures; nuclear and radiation studies board; Division on Earth and Life Studies. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ng KH, Mclean ID (2011) Diagnostic radiology in the tropics: technical considerations. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 15(5):441–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ng KH, Rehani MM (2006) X ray imaging goes digital. BMJ 333(7572):765–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 390(9840):499–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Perez MR, Lau LSW (2010) WHO workshop on radiation risk assessment in paediatric health care. J Radiol Prot 30(1):105–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Physicians Ultrasound in Rwanda Education Initiative PURE (2013) https://sites.google.com/site/rwandaultrasound/home. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  70. RAD-AID International (2013) http://www.rad-aid.org. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  71. Radiology Events Register (2012) http://www.raer.org/index.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  72. Radiation Oncology Safety Information System (2012) http://www.rosis.info/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  73. Rehani MM (2013) Challenges in radiation protection of patients for the 21st century. Am J Roentgenol 200(4):762–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Rehani MM, Frush DP (2011) Patient exposure tracking: the IAEA smart card project. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 147(1–2):314–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Rehani MM, Frush DP, Berris T et al (2012) Patient radiation exposure tracking: worldwide programs and needs – results from the first IAEA survey. Eur J Radiol 81(10):e968–e976

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Rosenthal DI, Weilburg JB, Schultz T et al (2006) Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience. J Am Coll Radiol 3(10):799–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (2005) CanMEDS framework. http://www.royalcollege.ca/public/canmeds/framework. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  78. Runciman W, Hibbert P, Thomson R et al (2009) Towards an international classification for patient safety: key concepts and terms. Int J Qual Saf Health Care 21(1):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Silva E III (2010) PQRI: from bonus to penalty. J Am Coll Radiol 7(11):835–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sistrom CL, Dang PA, Weilburg JB et al (2009) Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. Radiology 251(1):147–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Spencer PA (2012) Shared learning can help minimize errors. http://www.auntminnieeurope.com/index.aspx?sec=nws&sub=rad&pag=dis&ItemID=607379. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  82. Sung DW (2011) Investigation of patient dose for diagnostic reference levels (DRL) in radiographic examination: national survey in Korea. Final report. Korea Food and Drug Administration, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  83. The Hippocratic Oath. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/greek/greek_oath.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  84. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (2013a) InsideRadiology. http://www.insideradiology.com.au/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  85. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (2013b) CPD overview. http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/cpd/overview. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  86. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (2013c) The quality use of diagnostic program. http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/quality-a-safety/qudi. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  87. The Royal College of Radiologists (2012) Virtual departments. http://www.goingfora.com/index.html Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  88. The State of California SB 1237 (2010) http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_1201-1250/sb_1237_bill_20100929_chaptered.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  89. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2010) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. UNSCEAR 2008 report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  90. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2013) UNSCEAR 2012 report to the general assembly, with annexes. United Nations, New York (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  91. United States Food and Drug Administration (2010) Initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging. http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/ucm199994.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  92. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2010) Safety culture. http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/safety-culture.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  93. Vano E (2011) Global view on radiation protection in medicine. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 147(1–2):3–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Vano E, Gonzalez L (2001) Approaches to establishing reference levels in interventional radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 94(1–2):109–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Womack JP, Jones DT (2003) Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  96. World Bank (2012) Total health expenditure per capita. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PCAP. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  97. World Health Organization (2008) WHO global initiative on radiation safety in health care settings technical meeting report. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  98. World Health Organization (2009) Conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety version 1.1. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  99. World Health Organization (2010a) World Health Report – health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. http://www.who.int/whr/2010/en/index.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  100. World Health Organization (2010b) Medical imaging specialists call for global referral guidelines. http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/medical_exposure/referral_guidelines.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  101. World Health Organization (2013) Health risk assessment from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami based on a preliminary dose estimation. http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/pub_meet/fukushima_dose_assessment/en/index.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2013

  102. Zaidi H, Del Guerra A (2011) An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems. Med Phys 38(10):5667–5689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Lau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lau, L., Ng, KH. (2014). Radiological Safety and Quality: Paradigms in Leadership and Innovation. In: Lau, L., Ng, KH. (eds) Radiological Safety and Quality. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7256-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7256-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7256-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics