Erratum to: Sustainable Phosphorus Management: A Transdisciplinary Challenge

The online version of the original chapter can be found under DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7250-2_1

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Erratum to: Chapter 1 in: R. W. Scholz et al. (eds.), Sustainable Phosphorus Management, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7250-2_1

In the artwork of Fig. 7, the terms “Mineral fertilizer + Manure” and “Mineral fertilizer” should be replaced with “Phosphate rock + Manure” and “Phosphate rock“, respectively. Hence, Fig. 7 should be displayed as:

Fig. 7

The evolution of phosphorus fertilizer use, where mineral phosphorus plays an increasingly important key role (phosphorus data—80 to 85 % for fertilizer use—from USGS, presented as moving mean with a 3-year sliding window; rough estimation of manure data based on literature, see Sect. 4.8.2; population data from (USCB 2009); manure data extrapolated from different data on annual manure production, see text)

In the artwork of Fig. 28, the term “Mineral fertilizer” should be replaced with “Phosphate rock”. Hence, Fig. 28 should be displayed as:

Fig. 28

Different trends of phosphorus use in different periods (x-axis: Mt P, data from USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries; the graph is generated by unweighted moving average statistics to smooth annual fluctuations using a five-year time window)

In the published volume, Fig. 28 was mistakenly placed in “Spotlight 2” (chapter appendix) near Fig. 29. It should be moved to page 100 (in chapter text).