Skip to main content

The Practice of Professional Agency and the Emergence of Collaborative Creativity in Developmental Staff Meetings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discourses on Professional Learning

Abstract

In this study, we focused on the manifestations of professional agency and collaborative creativity in team meetings. We aimed to investigate how different kinds of professional agency are related to collaborative creativity. We used an ethnographic approach, collecting observational data from the team meetings of the Human Resource Department of a Finnish Health Care District during 2009–2010. We found that professional agency is practised in various ways in team meetings, reflecting different habitual practices and power relations. In addition, it appeared that the nature of the professional agency practised affected the emergence of collaborative creativity. An environment with a high degree of freedom and a conversational atmosphere supported the practice of professional agency and the emergence of collaborative creativity. By contrast, a tradition of regulation and non-conversational practices acted as obstacles to agency and creativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alasoini, T. (2011). Workplace development as part of broad-based innovation policy: Exploiting and exploring three types of knowledge. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 1(1), 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alasoini, T., Heikkilä, A., & Ramstad, E. (2012). Management and employee views on outcomes of workplace reforms in comparison. The case of publicly supported development projects in Finland. 16th world congress of the International Labour & Employment Relations Association (ILERA). Philadelphia: ILERA. Retrieved May 19, 2014, from http://ilera2012.wharton.upenn.edu/index.htm.

  • Alasoini, T. Järvensivu, A., & Mäkitalo, J. (2012). Suomen työelämä vuonna 2030: Miten ja miksi se on toisennäköisempää kuin tällä hetkellä? TEM raportteja 14, 2012 [Working life in Finland 2030: Why and how it is different than now? Publication of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy 14, 2012.].

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Angrosino, M. V. (2008). Recontextualizing observation: Ethnography, pedagogy, and the prospects for a progressive political agenda. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. British Journal of Sociology, 33(4), 455–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (1996). Culture and agency. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2010). Conversations about reflexivity. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. New York: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organizations. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D. (2005). From fieldwork to theory and representation in ethnography. In G. Troman, B. Jeffrey, & G. Walford (Eds.), Methodological issues and practices in ethnography (Studies in Educational Ethnography, Vol. 11). S.I.: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., Field, J., Hodkinson, P., Macleod, F., & Goodson, I. (2011). Improving learning through the lifecourse: Learning lives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2008). Emerging perspectives on workplace learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & A. Eteläpelto (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplace learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2009). Conceptualizing learning experiences: Contributions and meditations of the social, personal, and brute. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(1), 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. (2006). An ethnographer’s tale: A personal view of educational ethnography. In D. Hobbs & R. Wright (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of fieldwork. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, C. (2006). Workers, subjectivity and decent work. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning. Understanding learning through working life. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. (2005). Theorising the mundane. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 5(2), 148–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. (2006). The problem of agency in feminism: A critical realist approach. Gender and Education, 18(3), 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, K., Paloniemi, S., & Mecklin, J. (2010). Promoting inter-professional teamwork and learning – The case of a surgical operating theatre. Journal of Education and Work, 23(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin, K., Sintonen, T., Paloniemi, S., & Auvinen, T. (2011). Work, power and learning in risk filled occupation. Management and Learning, 42(3), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. A. (2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & Baas, M. (2011). Creativity in individuals and groups: Basic principles with practical implications. In D. De Cremer, R. van Dick, & J. K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and organisations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Nicoll, K. (2006). Action at a distance: Governmentality, subjectivity and workplace learning. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning. Understanding learning through working life. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eteläpelto, A., Heiskanen, T., & Collin, K. (2011). Vallan ja toimijuuden monisäikeisyys. [Complicated relations of power and agency] In A. Eteläpelto, T. Heiskanen & K. Collin (Eds.) Valta ja toimijuus aikuiskasvatuksessa [Agency and power in adult education] Vantaa, Finland: Kansanvalistusseura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eteläpelto, A., & Lahti, J. (2008). The resources and obstacles of creative collaboration in a long-term learning community. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), 226–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2006). Escaping/becoming subjects: Learning to work the boundaries in boundaryless work. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning. Understanding learning through working life. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Somerville, M. (2006). Work, subjectivity and learning: Prospects and issues. In S. Billett, T. Fenwick, & M. Somerville (Eds.), Work, subjectivity and learning. Understanding learning through working life. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2008). Who’s your city? How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., & Tinagli, I. (2004). Europe in the creative age. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2007). Europe in the global age. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, L. (2011). The shift. The future of work is already here. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2005). Ethnography, toleration and authenticity: Ethical reflections on fieldwork, analysis and writing. In G. Troman, B. Jeffrey, & G. Walford (Eds.), Methodological issues and practices in ethnography (Studies in Educational Ethnography, Vol. 11). S.I.: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. H. (2007). Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25(2), 170–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hökkä, P., Eteläpelto, A., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2012). The professional agency of teacher educators amid academic discourses. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(1), 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvensivu, A., & Alasoini, T. (2012). Mitä työelämän muutoksen tulevaisuussuuntautunut tutkimus voisi olla? Työpoliittinen Aikakauskirja 3, 2012 [What could future orientated working life change research be? Work Policy Review 3, 2012. Publication of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy.].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, K., Taylor, S., & Eteläpelto, A. (2012). Special issue introduction: Creativity and creative work in contemporary working context. Vocations and Learning, 5(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miell, D., & Littleton, K. (Eds.). (2004). Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloniemi, S., & Collin, K. (2010). Discursive power and creativity in inter-professional work. Vocations and Learning, 5(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puccio, G., & Cabra, J. (2010). Organizational creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4), 518–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (Ed.). (2007). Everyday creativity. Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity: Process and way of life – Four key issues. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, collaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: the science of human innovation. Oxford, NY: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius. The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukup, C. (2013). The postmodern ethnographic flaneur and the study of hyper-mediated everyday life. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 42(2), 226–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Constraints on creativity: Obvious and not so obvious. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vähäsantanen, K., & Billett, S. (2008). Negotiating professional identity. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & A. Eteläpelto (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplace learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vähäsantanen, K., & Eteläpelto, A. (2009). Vocational teachers in the face of major educational reform: Individual ways of negotiating professional identities. Journal of Education and Work, 22(1), 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, R. J. (2006). Normativity and the will: Selected essays on moral psychology and practical reason. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Central Finland Regional Fund of the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the Finnish Doctoral Programme in Education and Learning (FIDPEL) supported the study presented here. The authors wish to thank the organization and its employees for their cooperation. We would like to thank Donald Adamson for polishing the language and we are also grateful to two anonymous referees for their helpful comments regarding this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panu Forsman M.Ed. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forsman, P., Collin, K., Eteläpelto, A. (2014). The Practice of Professional Agency and the Emergence of Collaborative Creativity in Developmental Staff Meetings. In: Harteis, C., Rausch, A., Seifried, J. (eds) Discourses on Professional Learning. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7012-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics