Skip to main content

Emergence and Empathy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Institutions, Emotions, and Group Agents

Part of the book series: Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality ((SIPS,volume 2))

  • 1246 Accesses

Abstract

The topic of empathy has recently received a good deal of attention, both for the questions it raises about its mechanisms and for the role it might play in motivating moral behaviour. The present chapter addresses both of these questions in the light of considerations about how shared experiences emerge from emotional interactions between individuals. It comprises three parts. I begin with the more general issue of the reducibility of collective emotions to individual emotions or other, sub-emotional, individual states. I do this by briefly situating the discussion in the context of two notions that have been somewhat contentious in philosophy during the last few decades: externalism, and emergence. In the second part, I narrow my focus to empathy, and discuss some speculations about its mechanism. In a third and concluding section, I draw on both the preceding discussion as well as some further considerations to buttress sceptical doubts about the importance of empathy for morality.

‘I weep for you’, the Walrus said:

‘I deeply sympathize.’

With sobs and tears he sorted out

Those of the largest size,

Holding his pocket-handkerchief

Before his streaming eyes.

Lewis Carroll

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To draw the starkest contrast with Campbell’s thesis, one can turn to the purest form of existentialism, illustrated by Sartre’s play Les Mains Sales. The central character, Hugo, a Communist Party member, had been ordered to kill a deviationist Party leader. He did indeed kill him, but out of sexual jealousy. The party having now adopted the dead leader’s line, Hugo could save his life by admitting that he killed out of jealousy, not political conviction. But in the climactic scene of the play he chooses to be “non-recuperable” by the Party, by retroactively construing his motive as political. In this existentialist view, the psychological and collective facts don’t matter. The individual can just choose by fiat the nature of his past act (Sartre 1948).

  2. 2.

    I wish to thank conference participants for discussion at the 2010 Basel Conference at which these ideas were first presented, and I am particularly grateful to an anonymous reviewer for extremely helpful criticisms of an earlier draft of this chapter.

References

  • Baron-Cohen, S. 2011. The science of evil: Empathy and the origins of cruelty. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, J., D. Mitchell, and K. Blair. 2005. The psychopath: Emotion and the brain. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. 2008. How your friends’ friends can affect your mood. New Scientist 2689, December 30, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., and P.J. Richerson. 2005. The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, G., and E. Cochran. 1980. Towards a mechanism of joint visual attention in human infancy. In Thought without language, ed. L. Weiskrantz, 5–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. 1998. Interpreting the personal: Expression and the formation of feeling. Ithaca: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charny, E.J. 1966. Psychosomatic manifestations of rapport in psychotherapy. Psychosomatic Medicine 28: 305–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Botton, A. 1993. On love. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. 2009. The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J.M. 2002. Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., and A. Goldman. 1998. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(12): 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. 1990. Wise choices, apt feelings: A theory of normative judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. 2009. The philosophical baby: What children’s minds tell us about truth, love, and the meaning of life. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J., and R.L. Lewontin. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossion paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205: 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, G. 2005. What puts the jointness into joint attention? In Joint attention: Communication and other minds. Issues in philosophy and psychology, ed. N. Elian, 198–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., and I. Daibo. 2006. Interactional synchrony in conversations about emotional episodes: “A measurement by ‘the between-participants pseudosynchrony experimental paradigm’”. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 30: 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bon, G. 1896. The crowd: A study of the popular mind. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukamel, R., A. Ekstrom, J. Kaplan, M. Iacoboni, and I. Fried. 2010. Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology 20(8): 750–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. 1979. Sexual perversion. In Mortal questions, 39–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyhan, B., and J. Reifler. 2010. When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior 30: 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. 2011. Is empathy necessary for morality? In Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives, ed. P. Goldie and A. Coplan, 211–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. 1973. Meaning and reference. Journal of Philosophy 73(19): 699–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. 2009. The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. 2009. The philosopher and the wolf: Lessons from the wild on life, death and happiness. London: Granta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. 1948. Les mains sales: Pièce en sept tableaux. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, M.B., A. Roebroeck, R. Renkena, L. Nanetti, and C. Keysers. 2010. Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107(20): 9388–9393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. 2007. When compassion fails. New Scientist, April 7, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, G.J.S., J. Lauren, and U. Hasson. 2010. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. In Proceedings of the National Association for Science 107(32): 14425–14430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignemont, F., and T. Singer. 2006. The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Science 10(10): 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zetter, K. 2010. TED 2010: “Nicholas Christakis: Does this social network make me look fat?” Wired. http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/02/ted-2010-nicholas-christakis-does-this-social-network-make-me-look-fat/. Last accessed 14 Jan 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald de Sousa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Sousa, R. (2014). Emergence and Empathy. In: Konzelmann Ziv, A., Schmid, H. (eds) Institutions, Emotions, and Group Agents. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6934-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics