Abstract
There is a tacit rationality, with a broader more qualitative mathematical essence, that has another origin and another character and function than traditional classroom mathematics. This kind of rationality is bound to personal acting in complex settings, and to our bodily interactions with the outside world. It is easily identified as a specific quality in the work of experienced craftsmen, surgeons, engineers, musicians, and sportsmen, but we will find it everywhere in ordinary working life. It is also a necessary interpretation tool when you shall bring to life and concretion abstract and general scientific models, a bridging process that needs dialogue and mutual respect.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cooley, M. (1985). Drawing up the corporate plan at Lucas Aerospace. In D. MacKenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Devlin, K. (1997). Mathematics: The science of patterns. New York: Scientific American Library.
Dreufus, S. E. (2004). The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 24(3), 177–181.
Du Sautoy, M. (2008). Finding moonshine: A mathematician’s journey through symmetry. London: Harper Collins.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgement, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
Feutrie, M. (2007, March). Validation of non formal and informal learning in Europe: Comparative approaches, challenges and possibilities. Paper presented at Recognition of prior learning: Nordic-Baltic experiences and European perspectives congress, Copenhagen.
FitzSimons, G. (2002). What counts as mathematics? Technologies of power in adult and vocational education. Boston: Kluwer.
Gellert, U., & Jablonka, E. (Eds.). (2007). Mathematisation and demathematisation: Social, philosophical and educational ramifications. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Göranzon, B., Hammarén, M., & Ennals, R. (Eds.). (2006). Dialogue, skill & tacit knowledge. Chichester: Wiley.
Gustafsson, L., & Mouwitz, L. (2008). Validation of adults’ proficiency – Fairness in focus. Göteborg: National Center for Mathematics Education, University of Gothenburg.
Hoyles, C., Noss, R., & Pozzi, S. (2001). Proportional reasoning in nursing practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(1), 4–27.
Johannessen, K. S. (1988). The concept of practice in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. Inquiry, 31(3), 357–369.
Johannessen, K. S. (1999). Praxis och tyst kunnande. Stockholm: Dialoger.
Lakoff, G., & Núnez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Lieberman, M. D. (2000). Intuition; A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 109–137.
Lu, P. J., & Steinhardt, P. J. (2007). Decagonal and quasi-crystalline tilings in medieval Islamic architecture. Science, 315, 1106–1110.
Noss, R. (2002). Mathematical epistemologies at work. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 2–13.
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (2010). Modeling to address techno-mathematical literacies at work. In R. Lesh, C. Haines, P. Galbraith, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (ICTMA 13) (pp. 75–86). New York: Springer.
Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Pozzi, S. (2000). Working knowledge: Mathematics in use. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for mathematics in the workplace (pp. 17–35). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Polanyi, M. (1998). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy (First published 1958. Corrected 1962. Reprinted 1998 ed.). London: Routledge.
Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
Pozzi, S., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1998). Tools in practice, mathematics in use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(2), 105–122.
Roth, W.-M. (2003). Competent workplace mathematics: How signs become transparent in use. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 8(2), 161–189.
Sennet, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Skovsmose, O. (2005). Travelling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan. The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.
Vergnaud, G. (2000). Introduction. In A. Bessot & J. Ridgway (Eds.), Education for the workplace (pp. xvii–xxiv). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Wake, G. (2007). Considering workplace activity from a mathematical modelling perspective. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 395–402). New York: Springer.
Wake, G., & Williams, J. (2001). Using college mathematics in understanding workplace practices. Summative report of research project funded by the Leverhulme trust. Manchester: University of Manchester.
Zevenbergen, R., & Zevenbergen, K. (2009). The numeracies of boatbuilding: New numeracies shaped by workplace technologies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 183–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mouwitz, L. (2013). Rationality of Practice and Mathematical Modelling – On Connections, Conflicts, and Codifications. In: Stillman, G., Kaiser, G., Blum, W., Brown, J. (eds) Teaching Mathematical Modelling: Connecting to Research and Practice. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6540-5_48
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6539-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6540-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)