Abstract
Mathematicians often speak of conjectures, yet unproved, as probable or well-confirmed by evidence. The Riemann Hypothesis, for example, is widely believed to be almost certainly true. There seems no initial reason to distinguish such probability from the same notion in empirical science. Yet it is hard to see how there could be probabilistic relations between the necessary truths of pure mathematics. The existence of such logical relations, short of certainty, is defended using the theory of logical probability (or objective Bayesianism or non-deductive logic), and some detailed examples of its use in mathematics surveyed. Examples of inductive reasoning in experimental mathematics are given and it is argued that the problem of induction is best appreciated in the mathematical case.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aschbacher, M. (1980). The finite simple groups and their classification. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Aschbacher, M. (2001). The status of the classification of the finite simple groups. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 51, 736–740.
Baker, A. (2007). Is there a problem of induction for mathematics? In M. Leng, A. Paseau, & M. Potter (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge (pp. 59–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baker, A. (2008). Experimental mathematics. Erkenntnis, 68, 331–344.
Baker, A. (2009). Non-deductive methods in mathematics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed May 2013. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mathematics-nondeductive/
Bender, H. (1970). On the uniqueness theorem. Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 14, 376–384.
Borwein, J. M., & Bailey, D. H. (2004). Mathematics by experiment: Plausible reasoning in the 21st century. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.
Borwein, J. M., Bailey, D. H., & Girgensohn, R. (2004). Experimentation in mathematics: Computational paths to discovery. Natick, MA: A. K. Peters.
Brent, R., van de Lune, J., te Riele, H., & Winter, D. (1982). On the zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function in the critical strip. II. Mathematics of Computation, 39, 681–688.
Brown, J. R. (1999). Philosophy of mathematics: An introduction to the world of proofs and pictures. London: Routledge.
Chandler, C. (1999). Hello, I must be going: Groucho Marx and his friends. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Collins, M. J. (1980). Finite simple groups, II. London: Academic.
Corfield, D. (2003). Towards a philosophy of real mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Derbyshire, J. (2003). Prime obsession: Bernhard Riemann and the greatest unsolved problem in mathematics. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Dove, I. J. (2009). Towards a theory of mathematical argument. Foundations of Science, 14(1–2), 137–152.
du Sautoy, M. (2003). The music of the primes: Searching to solve the greatest mystery in mathematics. New York: Harper Collins.
EcheverrÃa, J. (1996). Empirical methods in mathematics. In G. Munévar (Ed.), Spanish studies in the philosophy of science, volume 86 of Boston studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 19–55). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Edwards, H. M. (1974). Riemann’s zeta function. New York: Academic.
Epstein, D., Levy, S., & de la Llave, R. (1992). About this journal. Experimental Mathematics,1, 1–13.
Fadiman, C. (1955). The American treasury. New York: Harper.
Fallis, D. (1997). The epistemic status of probabilistic proof. Journal of Philosophy, 94, 165–186.
Fallis, D. (2000). The reliability of randomized algorithms. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 255–271.
Feit, W., & Thompson, J. G. (1963). Solvability of groups of odd order. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 13, 775–1029.
Franklin, J. (1987). Non-deductive logic in mathematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38(1), 1–18.
Franklin, J. (2001). Resurrecting logical probability. Erkenntnis, 55, 277–305.
Franklin, J. (2009). What science knows and how it knows it. New York: Encounter Books.
Franklin, J. (2011). The objective Bayesian conceptualisation of proof and reference class problems. Sydney Law Review, 33, 545–561.
Gorenstein, D. (1979). The classification of finite simple groups (I). Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 1, 43–199 (New Series).
Gorenstein, D. (1980). An outline of the classification of finite simple groups. In B. Cooperstein & G. Mason (Eds.), The Santa Cruz conference on finite groups, volume 37 of proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics (pp. 3–28). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Gorenstein, D. (1982). Finite simple groups. New York: Plenum.
Gorenstein, D., Lyons, R., & Solomon, R. (1994–2005). The classification of the finite simple groups (6 Vols.). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Gourdon, X. (2004). The 1013 first zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function, and zeros computation at very large height. Accessed May 2013. http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/Miscellaneous/zetazeros1e1%3-1e24.pdf
Hunt, D. (1980). A computer-based atlas of finite simple groups. In B. Cooperstein & G. Mason (Eds.), The Santa Cruz conference on finite groups, volume 37 of proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics (pp. 507–510). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Ivić, A. (2003). On some reasons for doubting the Riemann Hypothesis. Accessed May 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0311162
Janko, Z. (1966). A new finite simple group with abelian 2-Sylow subgroups and its characterization. Journal of Algebra, 3, 147–186.
Jaynes, E. T. (2003). Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan.
Kolata, G. B. (1976). Mathematical proofs: The genesis of reasonable doubt. Science, 192, 989–990.
Lehrer Dive, L. (2003). An epistemic structuralist account of mathematical knowledge. PhD thesis, University of Sydney.
Linnik, Y. V. (1952). Some conditional theorems concerning the binary Goldbach problem. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, 16, 503–520.
Lyons, R. (1972). Evidence for a new finite simple group. Journal of Algebra, 20, 540–569.
Marsaglia, G. (2005). On the randomness of pi and other decimal expansions. Accessed May 2013. http://www.yaroslavvb.com/papers/marsaglia-on.pdf
Mason, G. (1980). Preface. In B. Cooperstein & G. Mason (Eds.), The Santa Cruz conference on finite groups, volume 37 of proceedings of symposia in pure mathematics (p. xiii). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Müller, J., & Neunhöffer, M. (1987). Some computations regarding Foulkes’ conjecture. Experimental Mathematics, 14, 277–283.
O’Nan, M. (1976). Some evidence for the existence of a new finite simple group. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 32, 421–479.
Pólya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning (2 Vols.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Renyi, A. (1962). On the representation of an even number as the sum of a prime and an almost prime. American Mathematical Society Translations, 2nd series, 19, 299–321.
Riemann, B. (1859 [1974]). On the number of primes less than a given magnitude. In H. Edwards (Ed.), Riemann’s zeta function (pp. 299–305). New York: Academic.
Ruhkin, A. (2001). Testing randomness: A suite of statistical procedures. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 45, 111–132.
Sabbagh, K. (2002). Dr Riemann’s zeros. London: Atlantic Books.
Solomon, R. (2001). A brief history of the classification of the finite simple groups. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 38, 315–352.
Tenenbaum, G. (1995). Introduction to analytic and probabilistic number theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tits, J. (1971). Groupes finis simples sporadiques. In A. Dold & B. Eckmann (Eds.), Séminaire Bourbaki, volume 180 of Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics (pp. 187–211). New York: Springer.
Van Kerkhove, B., & Van Bendegem, J. P. (2008). Pi on earth, or mathematics in the real world. Erkenntnis, 68, 421–435.
Wang, Y. (Ed.). (2002). Goldbach conjecture. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
Weil, A. (1948). Variétés abéliennes et courbes algébriques. Paris: Hermann.
Williamson, J. (2010). In defence of objective Bayesianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zeilberger, D. (1993). Theorems for a price: Tomorrow’s semi-rigorous mathematical culture. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 46, 978–981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franklin, J. (2013). Non-deductive Logic in Mathematics: The Probability of Conjectures. In: Aberdein, A., Dove, I. (eds) The Argument of Mathematics. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6534-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6534-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6533-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6534-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)