Abstract
Measuring nano- and submicron particles suspended in liquids continues to be a difficult task not only because there is no universal sizing technique but, on the contrary, because there are too many alternative methods. These are quite different in their measuring principles and for that may lead to rather different results, especially if the particles under analysis are far from spherical and exhibit broad size distributions.
This chapter is mainly dedicated to the users who are not very acquainted with particle sizing issues but need to select the most adequate method to characterize their suspensions. Having in mind the size range and sample type, seven different methods were selected: besides microscopic methods, that are normally the first choice to “see” the particles, this chapter encompasses techniques based on the measurement of particles Brownian motion (DLS and NTA) and on centrifugal sedimentation (DSC and SdFFF). The operating principles of these techniques as well as their merits and limitations will be discussed.
When you can measure what you are speaking about, you know something about it. But when you cannot measure it, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory kind. It may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely advanced to the stage of science.
Lord Kelvin, 1883
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen T (1997) Particle size measurement, vol I: Powder sampling and particle size measurement. Chapman & Hall, London
Baron PA, Willeke K (2001) Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques, and applications. Wiley, New York
Provder T (1991) Particle size distribution II: assessment and characterization. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
Bowen P (2002) Particle size distribution measurement from millimeters to nanometers and from rods to platelets. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia
Barreiros FM, Ferreira PJ, Figueiredo MM (1996) Calculating shape factors from particle sizing data. Part Part Syst Charact 13:368–373
Weiner B (2011) A guide to choosing a particle sizer. In: Focus on microscopy & microtechniques. http://www.labmate-online.com. Accessed Mar 2012
Stintz M (2009) Review of nanometrology for engineered nanoparticles within europe – strengths & opportunities. In: Co-nanomet European workshop. Technical University Dresden, DE. http://www.co-nanomet.eu. Accessed Mar 2012
Łojkowski W, Turan R (2006) In: Łojkowski W, Turan R, Proykova A, Daniszewska A (eds) Eighth nanoforum report: nanometrology European nanotechnology gateway, Düsseldorf
ISO (2008) Particle size analysis—dynamic light scattering (DLS). International Standards for Business, Government and Society
Aitken RJ, Creely KS, Tran CL (2004) Nanoparticles: an occupational hygiene review. In: Research report 274. Institute of Occupational Medicine. http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr274.pdf. Accessed Mar 2012
Kuhlbusch TAJ, Asbach C, Fissan H, Göhler D, Stintz M (2011) Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: a review. Part Fibre Toxicol 8:8–22
ISO (2007) Workplace atmospheres – ultrafine, nanoparticle and nano-structured aerosols – Inhalation exposure characterization and assessment. International Standards for Business, Government and Society
Goodhew PJ, Humphreys FJ, Beanland R (2001) Electron microscopy and analysis. Taylor & Francis, London
Flegler SL, Heckman JW, Klomparens KL (1993) Scanning and transmission electron microscopy: an introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Heath JP (2005) Dictionary of microscopy. Wiley, Chichester
Goldstein J, Newbury DE, Echlin P, Joy DC, Romig AD Jr, Lyman CE, Fiori C, Lifshin E (1992) Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis: a text for biologists, materials scientists, and geologists. Plenum Press, New York
Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C (1986) Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 56:930–933
Boyd RD, Cuenat A (2010) New analysis procedure for fast and reliable size measurement of nanoparticles from atomic force microscopy images. J Nanopart Res 13:105–113
Starostina N, West P (2006) Quantitative and qualitative nanopowder nanoparticle characterization with AFM. Adv Powder Metall Part Mater 1:02–17
Starostina N, Brodsky M, Prikhodko S, Hoo CM, Mecartney ML, West P (2008) AFM capabilities in characterization of particles and surfaces: from angstroms to microns. J Cosmet Sci 59:225–232
Gélinas V, Vidal D (2010) Determination of particle shape distribution of clay using an automated AFM image analysis method. Powder Technol 203:254–264
Mechler Á, Kopniczky J, Kokavecz J, Hoel A, Granqvist CG, Heszler P (2005) Anomalies in nanostructure size measurements by AFM. Phys Rev B 72:125407–125412
Mott D, Cotts B, Lim IS, Luo J, Park HY, Njoki P, Schadt MJ, Zhong CJ (2008) Size determination of nanoparticles based on tapping-mode atomic force microscopy measurements. J Scan Probe Microsc 3:1–8
Gupta S, Brouwer P, Bandyopadhyay S, Patil S, Briggs R, Jain J, Seal S (2005) TEM/AFM investigation of size and surface properties of nanocrystalline ceria. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 5:1101–1107
Russell P, Batchelor D, Thornton J (2001) Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM): complementary techniques for high resolution surface investigations. Surf Mod Technol 134(10):109–118
Berne BJ, Pecora R (2000) Dynamic light scattering: with applications to chemistry, biology, and physics. Dover Publications, Mineola
ISO (1996) Particle size analysis – photon correlation spectroscopy. International Standards for Business, Government and Society
Pecora R (1985) Dynamic light scattering: applications of photon correlation spectroscopy. Plenum, New York
Dahneke BE (1983) Measurement of suspended particles by quasi-elastic light scattering. Wiley, Chichester
Brown W (1993) Dynamic light scattering: the method and some applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cao A (2003) Light scattering. Recent applications. Anal Lett 36:3185–3225
Provencher SW (1982) A constrained regularization method for inverting data represented by linear algebraic or integral equations. Comput Phys Commun 27:213–227
Finsy R (1994) Particle sizing by quasi-elastic light scattering. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 52:79–143
Stepanek P (1993) Data analysis in dynamic light scattering. In: Brown W (ed) Dynamic light scattering: the method and some applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Roig AR, Alessandrini JL (2006) Particle size distributions from static light scattering with regularized non-negative least squares constraints. Part Part Syst Charact 23:431–437
Malloy A, Carr B (2006) Nanoparticle tracking analysis – the Halo™ system. Part Part Syst Charact 23:197–204
Malloy A (2011) Count, size and visualize nanoparticles. Mater Today 14:170–173
Filipe V, Hawe A, Jiskoot W (2010) Critical evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates. Pharm Res 27:796–810
Weiner BB, Fairhurst D, Tscharnuter WW (1991) Particle size analysis with a disc centrifuge: importance of the extinction efficiency. In: Provder T (ed) Particle size distribution II: assessment and characterization. ACS symposium series, Washington, DC
Devon MJ, Provder T, Rudin A (1991) Measurement of particle size distributions with a disc centrifuge. Data analysis considerations. In: Provder T (ed) Particle size distribution II: assessment and characterization. ACS symposium series, Washington, DC
Wittmer S. CPS disc centrifuges – a well proven method with modern technology. LOT-Oriel, Darmstadt
Giddings JC, Myers MN, Moon MH, Barman BN (1991) Particle separation and size characterization by sedimentation field-flow fractionation. In: Provder T (ed) Particle size distribution II: assessment and characterization. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
Cölfen H, Antonietti M (2000) Field-flow fractionation techniques for polymer and colloid analysis. Adv Polym Sci 157(2000):67–187
Messaud FA, Sanderson RD, Runyon JR, Otte T, Pasch H, Ratanathanawongs Williams SK (2009) An overview on field-flow fractionation techniques and their applications in the separation and characterization of polymers. Prog Polym Sci 34:351–368
Contado C, Argazzi R (2009) Size sorting of citrate reduced gold nanoparticles by sedimentation field-flow fractionation. J Chromatogr A 1216:9088–9098
Arakawa T, Philo JS, Ejima D, Sato H, Tsumoto K (2007) Aggregation analysis of therapeutic proteins, part 3: principles and optimization of Field-Flow Fractionation (FFF). Bioproc Int 5:52–70
Barman BN, Giddings JC (1991) Overview of colloidal aggregation by sedimentation field-flow fractionation. In: Provder T (ed) Particle size distribution II. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
Murphy DM, Garbarino JR, Taylor HE, Hart BT, Beckett R (1993) Determination of size and element composition distributions of complex colloids by sedimentation field-flow fractionation – inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 642:459–467
Roda B, Zattoni A, Reschiglian P, Moon MH, Mirasoli M, Michelini E, Roda A (2009) Field-flow fractionation in bioanalysis: a review of recent trends. Anal Chim Acta 635:132–143
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Figueiredo, M. (2013). Sizing Nanoparticles in Liquids: An Overview of Methods. In: Coelho, J. (eds) Drug Delivery Systems: Advanced Technologies Potentially Applicable in Personalised Treatment. Advances in Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6010-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6010-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6009-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6010-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)