Abstract
In silico modeling is a powerful tool for the prediction of bone remodeling and mechanobiology. As the method is gaining popularity a standardized measure for the in vivo validation of the quality of the produced simulations is required. In this review, we discuss current validity assessment approaches, as well as the validation ‘gold standard’, in which the experimental and computational parts are carried out concomitantly, and by the same research team. A novel validation framework for the tissue level model, based on the true geometry is introduced.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adachi T, Tsubota K, Tomita Y, Hollister SJ (2001) Trabecular surface remodeling simulation for cancellous bone using microstructural voxel finite element models. J Biomech Eng 123:403–409
Anderson AE, Ellis BJ, Weiss JA (2007) Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 10:171–184
Anderson EJ, Knothe Tate ML (2008) Idealization of pericellular fluid space geometry and dimension results in a profound underprediction of nano-microscale stresses imparted by fluid drag on osteocytes. J Biomech 41:1736–1746
Bonivtch AR, Bonewald LF, Nicolella DP (2007) Tissue strain amplification at the osteocyte lacuna: a microstructural finite element analysis. J Biomech 40:2199–2206
Brekelmans W, Slooff T, Poort H (1972) New method to analyze mechanical behavior of skeletal parts. Acta Orthop Scand 43:301–317
Carter DR, Beaupré GS, Giori NJ, Helms JA (1998) Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res S355:S41–S55
Coelho PG, Fernandes PR, Rodrigues HC, Cardoso JB, Guedes JM (2009) Numerical modeling of bone tissue adaptation—a hierarchical approach for bone apparent density and trabecular structure. J Biomech 42:830–837
Engh CA, Mcgovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH (1992) A quantitative-evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip-arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg, Am Vol 74:1009–1020
Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M (1989) The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4:3–11
Frisch T, Thoumine O (2002) Predicting the kinetics of cell spreading. J Biomech 35:1137–1141
Fritton SP, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT (2000) Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains. J Biomech 33:317–325
Frost HM (1964) The laws of bone structure. Thomas, Springfield
Gerhard FA, Webster DJ, van Lenthe GH, Müller R (2009) The relative significance of trabecular and cortical bone-density as a diagnostic index for osteoporosis. Philos Trans R Soc A 367:2011–2030
Goldstein SA, Matthews LS, Kuhn JL, Hollister SJ (1991) Trabecular bone remodeling—an experimental model. J Biomech 24:135–150
Guldberg RE, Richards M, Caldwell NJ, Kuelske CL, Goldstein SA (1997) Trabecular bone adaptation to variations in porous-coated implant topology. J Biomech 30:147–153
Hartmann MA, Dunlop JW, Brechet YJ, Fratzl P, Weinkamer R (2011) Trabecular bone remodelling simulated by a stochastic exchange of discrete bone packets from the surface. J Mech Beh Biomed Mat 4:879–887
Huiskes R (1997) Validation of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. Stud Health Technol Inform 40:33–48
Huiskes R, Chao EYS (1983) A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade. J Biomech 16:385–409
Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD, (2000) Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 405:704–706
Isaksson H (2012) Recent advances in mechanobiological modeling of bone regeneration. Mech Res Commun 42:22–31
Isaksson H, Wilson W, van Donkelaar CC, Huiskes R, Ito K (2006) Comparison of biophysical stimuli for mechano-regulation of tissue differentiation during fracture healing. J Biomech 39:1507–1516
Jacobs CR, Kelly DJ (2011) Cell mechanics: the role of simulation. In: Fernandes PR, Bártolo PJ (eds) Advances on modeling in tissue engineering. Computational methods in applied sciences, vol. 20, pp 1–14
Kelly K (1998) The third culture. Science 279:992–993
Kerner J, Huiskes R, van Lenthe GH, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B, Engh CA, Amis AA (1999) Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. J Biomech 32:695–703
Knothe Tate ML, Niederer P (1998) A theoretical FE-based model developed to predict the relative contribution of convective and diffusive transport mechanisms for the maintenance of local equilibria within cortical bone. In: Clegg S (ed) Advances in heat and mass transfer in biotechnology. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 133–142
Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ (2002) A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J Biomech 35:1163–1171
Landsberg C, Stenger F, Deutsch A, Gelinsky M, Rosen-Wolff A, Voigt A (2011) Chemotaxis of mesenchymal stem cells within 3D biomimetic scaffolds—a modeling approach. J Biomech 44:359–364
Leichter I, Bivas A, Giveon A, Margulies JY, Weinreb A (1987) The relative significance of trabecular and cortical bone-density as a diagnostic index for osteoporosis. Phys Med Biol 32:1167–1174
Lemaire V, Tobin FL, Greller LD, Cho CR, Suva LJ (2004) Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling. J Theor Biol 229:293–309
Lengsfeld M, Gunther D, Pressel T, Leppek R, Schmitt J, Griss P (2002) Validation data for periprosthetic bone remodelling theories. J Biomech 35:1553–1564
Lengsfeld M, Burchard R, Gunther D, Pressel T, Schmitt J, Leppek R, Griss P (2005) Femoral strain changes after total hip arthroplasty–patient-specific finite element analyses 12 years after operation. Med Eng Phys 27:649–654
Lio P, Merelli E, Paoletti N, Viceconti M (2011) A combined process algebraic and stochastic approach to bone remodeling. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci 277:41–52
Loosli Y, Luginbuehl R, Snedeker JG (2010) Cytoskeleton reorganization of spreading cells on micro-patterned islands: a functional model. Philos Trans R Soc, Math Phys Eng Sci 368:2629–2652
McGarry JG, Klein-Nulend J, Mullender MG, Prendergast PJ (2005) A comparison of strain and fluid shear stress in stimulating bone cell responses—a computational and experimental study. FASEB J 19:482–484
Müller R (2005) Long-term prediction of three-dimensional bone architecture in simulations of pre-, peri- and post-menopausal microstructural bone remodeling. Osteoporos Int 16:S25–S35
Müller R, Hayes WC (1997) Biomechanical competence of microstructural bone in the progress of adaptive bone remodeling. Proc SPIE 3149:69–81
Müller R, Rüegsegger P (1996) Analysis of mechanical properties of cancellous bone under conditions of simulated bone atrophy. J Biomech 29:1053–1060
Pivonka P, Zimak J, Smith DW, Gardiner BS, Dunstan CR, Sims NA, Martin TJ, Mundy GR (2008) Model structure and control of bone remodeling: a theoretical study. Bone 43:249–263
Potter LK, Greller LD, Cho CR, Nuttall ME, Stroup GB, Suva LJ, Tobin FL (2005) Response to continuous and pulsatile PTH dosing: a mathematical model for parathyroid hormone receptor kinetics. Bone 37:159–169
Roux W (1881) Der Kampf der Theile im Organismus. Ein Beitrag zur Vervollständigung der mechanischen Zweckmässigkeitslehre. Leipzig
Ruffoni D, Fratzl P, Roschger P, Klaushofer K, Weinkamer R (2007) The bone mineralization density distribution as a fingerprint of the mineralization process. Bone 40:1308–1319
Ruimerman R, Hilbers P, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R (2005a). A theoretical framework for strain-related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation. J Biomech 38:931–941
Ruimerman R, van Rietbergen B, Hilbers P, Huiskes R (2005b). The effects of trabecular-bone loading variables on the surface signaling potential for bone remodeling and adaptation. Ann Biomed Eng 33:71–78
Sangiorgio SN, Longjohn DB, Dorr LD, Ebramzadeh E (2011) Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations. J Biomech 44:235–243
Santos L, Romeu JC, Canhao H, Fonseca JE, Fernandes PR (2010) A quantitative comparison of a bone remodeling model with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and analysis of the inter-individual biological variability of femoral neck T-score. J Biomech 43:3150–3155
Schmitz MJ, Clift SE, Taylor WR, Hertig D, Warner MD, Ploeg HL, Bereiter H (2004) Investigating the effect of remodelling signal type on the finite element based predictions of bone remodelling around the thrust plate prosthesis: a patient-specific comparison. Proc Inst Mech Eng, H J Eng Med 218, pp 417–424
Schulte FA (2011) In silico bone biology in a murine model of bone adaptation. Diss. ETH No. 19679, Zurich
Schulte FA, Lambers FM, Webster DJ, Kuhn G, Müller R (2011) In vivo validation of a computational bone adaptation model using open-loop control and time-lapsed micro-computed tomography. Bone 49:1166–1172
Silva MJ, Gibson LJ (1997) Modeling the mechanical behavior of vertebral trabecular bone: effects of age-related changes in microstructure. Bone 21:191–199
Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Galante JO (1992) Remodeling and ingrowth of bone at two years in a canine cementless total hip-arthroplasty model. J Bone Jt Surg, Am Vol 74:239–250
Taylor D, Hazenberg JG, Lee TC (2007) Living with cracks: damage and repair in human bone. Nat Mater 6:263–268
Testi D, Cappello A, Sgallari F, Rumpf M, Viceconti M (2004) A new software for prediction of femoral neck fractures. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 75:141–145
Van der Linden JC, Verhaar JAN, Weinans H (2001) A three-dimensional simulation of age-related remodeling in trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 16:688–696
Van der Meulen MCH, Huiskes R (2002) Why mechanobiology? A survey article. J Biomech 35:401–414
Webster D, Müller R (2011) In silico models of bone remodeling from macro to nano-from organ to cell. Wires Syst Biol Med 3:241–251
Weinbaum S, Cowin SC, Zeng Y (1994) A model for the excitation of ostecytes by mechanical loading-induced bone fluid shear stresses. J Biomech 27:339–360
Wolff J (1892) Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Hirschwald, Berlin
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the European Union for the Osteoporotic Virtual Physiological Human project (VPHOP FP7-ICT2008-223865) and computational time from the Swiss National Supercomputing Center (CSCS, Manno, Switzerland).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Levchuk, A., Müller, R. (2013). In Vivo Validation of Predictive Models for Bone Remodeling and Mechanobiology. In: Holzapfel, G., Kuhl, E. (eds) Computer Models in Biomechanics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5464-5_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5464-5_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5463-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5464-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)