Abstract
Few religious symbols have ignited such public and widespread debate as the headscarf; since the 1980s, controversies in the political, judicial, and educational realms have reached across the European continent. In Germany, the headscarf debate, or Kopftuchstreit, is intrinsically connected to the country’s notions of secularism as it applies specifically to teachers; teachers who wear headscarves are denied teaching jobs not only because they are civil servants and supposed to represent German culture and ideals but because their religious beliefs are seen as threatening and incongruent with the German value system. The German Kopftuchstreit centers on two defining court cases: in one, a naturalized German educator is denied the right to wear a headscarf in the classroom because the courts defined the headscarf as inherently political, while the other grants the native-born educator the right to her headscarf because it was not perceived as a threat to the students. By framing my examination of the current literature on these court cases through the lens of intersectionality, this chapter posits that female Muslim teachers who are not ethnic Germans experience multiplicative oppressions based on their ethnicity as it intersects with their gendered religious identity, which contribute to the differing verdicts in these otherwise very similar court cases. By identifying the structural elements contributing to the invisibility of female Muslim educators, this chapter seeks to disengage hegemonic educational practices while simultaneously engaging the intersectional identity of this population.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Ius soli, the right of soil, is a foundational concept in citizenship laws which enables citizenship rights for anyone born within a nation-state. Ius sanguinis, the right of blood, allows citizenship to be recognized not based on place of birth but rather on the nationality of the parents. Until 2000, Germany’s citizenship law was modeled on ius sanguinis, but it now recognizes both.
- 2.
- 3.
Mae Henderson’s direct quote is as follows: “It is not that black women…have had nothing to say, but rather that they have had no say.”
References
Altinordu, A. (2004). The meaning(s) of the headscarf: The German Kopftuchstreit. Conference paper, American Sociological Association, pp. 1–23. San Francisco, CA.
Barbieri, W. A. (1998). Ethics of citizenship: Education and group rights in Germany. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Beale, F. (1970). Double jeopardy: To be black and female. In T. Cade (Ed.), The black woman (pp. 146–155). New York: Signet.
Bloemraad, I., Koretweg, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2008). Citizenship and immigration: Multiculturalism, assimilation, and challenges to the nation-state. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 153–179.
Borovali, M. (2009). Islamic headscarves and slippery slopes. Cardozo Law Review, 30(6), 2593–2611.
Brah, A., & Phoenix, A. (2004). Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(3), 75–86.
Chang, R. S., & Culp, J. M. (2002). After intersectionality. University of Kansas Law Review Symposium, 71(2), 485–491.
Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170–180.
Collins, P. H. (2000). Coming to voice, coming to power: Black Feminist thought as critical social theory. In J. Glazer-Raymo, B. Townsend, & B. Ropers-Huilman (Eds.), Women in higher education: A feminist perspective (Ashe reader series 2nd ed., pp. 34–52). Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing (original work published in 1997).
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139, 139–167.
Crenshaw, K. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In M. A. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). New York: Routledge.
Dill, B. T., McLaughlin, A. E., & Nieves, A. D. (2006). Future directions of feminist research: Intersectionality. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook on feminist research (pp. 629–638). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Dustin, M., & Phillips, A. (2008). Whose agenda is it? Abuses of women and abuses of culture in Britain. Ethnicities, 8(3), 405–424.
Ehrenreich, N. (2002). Subordination and symbiosis: Mechanisms of mutual support between subordinating systems. University of Kansas Law Review Symposium, 71(2).
Ehrkamp, P. (2006). “We Turks are no Germans”: Assimilation discourses and the dialectical construction of identities in Germany. Environment and Planning, 38, 1673–1692.
Fogel, R. S. (2007). Headscarves in German public schools: Religious minorities are welcome in Germany, unless – God forbid – They are religious. New York Law School Review, 51, 620–653.
Göktürk, D., Gramling, D., & Kaes, A. (Eds.). (2007). Germany in transit: Nation and migration 1955–2005. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Goldberg, A. (2002). Islam in Germany. In S. T. Hunter (Ed.), Islam, Europe’s second largest religion: The new social, cultural, and political landscape (pp. 29–50). London: Praeger.
Grillo, T. (1995). Anti-essentialism and intersectionality: Tools to dismantle the master’s house. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 10, 16–30.
Häuβler, U. (2001). Muslim dress-code in German state schools. European Journal of Migration and Law, 3, 457–474.
Hohmann, M. (2003). Speech on the day of German unity. In D. Göktürk, D. Gramling, & A. Kaes (Eds.), Germany in transit: Nation and migration 1955–2005 (pp. 145–147). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs, 14(1), 42–72.
Knapp, G. A. (2005). Reclaiming baggage in fast traveling theories. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12(3), 249–265.
Levit, N. (2002). Introduction: Theorizing the connections among systems of subordination. University of Kansas Law Review Symposium, 71(2), 227–249.
Mahalingam, R., Balan, S., & Haritatos, J. (2008). Engendering immigrant psychology: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 326–336.
Mandel, R. (1989). Turkish Headscarves and the ‘Foreigner Problem’. New German Critique, 46, 27–46.
Mandel, R. (2008). Cosmopolitan anxieties: Turkish challenges to citizenship and belonging in Germany. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.
Merz, F. (2000). Immigration and identity: On the freedom-based German guiding culture. In D. Göktürk, D. Gramling, & A. Kaes (Eds.), Germany in transit: Nation and migration 1955–2005 (pp. 313–314). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Mueller, C. (2006). Integrating Turkish communities: A German dilemma. Population Research & Policy Review, 25, 419–441.
Murphy-Shigematsu, S. (2004). Expanding the borders of the nation: Ethnic diversity and citizenship education in Japan. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Diversity and citizenship education: Global perspectives (pp. 303–332). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nash, J. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89, 1–15.
Rockhill, K. (2000). Dis/connecting literacy and sexuality: Speaking the unspeakable in the classroom. In J. Glazer-Raymo, B. Townsend, & B. Ropers-Huilman (Eds.), Women in higher education: A feminist perspective (Ashe reader series 2nd ed., pp. 391–412). Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing (original work published in 1997).
Ropers-Huilman, B. (2008). Women faculty and the dance of identities. In J. Glazer-Raymo (Ed.), Unfinished agendas: New and continuing gender challenges in higher education (pp. 35–51). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rostock, P., & Berghahn, S. (2008). The ambivalent role of gender in redefining the German nation. Ethnicities, 8(3), 345–364. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
Rottmann, S. B., & Marx Ferree, M. (2008). Citizenship and intersectionality: German feminist debates about headscarf and antidiscrimination laws. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 15(4), 481–513.
Schneider, J. (2002). Discourses of exclusion: Dominant self-definitions and “the Other” in German society. Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe, 2(1), 13–21.
Taylor, C. (2009). Forward: What is secularism? In G. B. Levey & T. Modood (Eds.), Secularism, religion and multicultural citizenship (pp. xi–xxii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Terkessidis, M. (2007). German guiding culture: The game of origins. In D. Göktürk, D. Gramling, & A. Kaes (Eds.), Germany in transit: Nation and migration 1955–2005 (pp. 316–319). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Todd, S. (2007). Unveiling cross-cultural conflict: Gendered cultural practice in polycultural society. In Philosophy of education: 2006 (pp. 283–291). Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.
Turkish Federation of Berlin. (2007). Ten-point plan of the Turkish federation of Berlin for combating intolerance toward women. In D. Göktürk, D. Gramling, & A. Kaes (Eds.), Germany in transit: Nation and migration 1955–2005 (p. 381). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
vom Bruck, G. (2008). Naturalising, neutralising women’s bodies: The “headscarf affair” and the politics of representation. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 15, 51–79.
von Campenhausen, A. F. (2004). The German headscarf debate. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2004(2), 665–699.
Weber, B. (2004). Cloth on her head, constitution in hand. German Politics and Society, 22(3), 33–64.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2009). Intersectionality and feminist politics. In M. T. Berger & K. Guidroz (Eds.), The intersectional approach: Transforming the academy through race, class & gender (pp. 25–43). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sandford-Gaebel, K. (2013). Germany, Islam, and Education: Unveiling the Contested Meaning(s) of the Headscarf. In: Gross, Z., Davies, L., Diab, AK. (eds) Gender, Religion and Education in a Chaotic Postmodern World. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5270-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5270-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5269-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5270-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)