Skip to main content

Energy Efficiency Policy in the USA: The Impact of the Industrial Assessment Centres (IAC) Programme and State and Regional Climate Policy Actions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dynamics of Environmental and Economic Systems
  • 1455 Accesses

Abstract

The impact that two US policies have had on energy consumption and carbon emissions of small and medium enterprises (SME) is analysed in this chapter. The first policy is the Industrial Assessment Centres (IAC) programme from the Department of Energy (DOE) of the US government in which assessments are offered to companies to identify energy efficiency (EE) measures. A probit model is used for a clearer understanding of EE investment determinants in SMEs. The second consists of the US State and Regional Climate Policy actions of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Panel data is used to analyse the impact of both policies, combining information on emissions and energy consumption per unit of real GDP for 51 US states over 19 years with data on EE investments as a consequence of the first policy, and, finally, 30 climate policies implemented at state and regional levels. The results show that some policies are more effective than others in reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions. There are also notable differences across states regarding climate policy and investment decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Boyd et al. (2008) for more information on industrial plant manufacturing energy use.

  2. 2.

    For more information, see http://www.iac.rutgers.edu

  3. 3.

    See Abadie et al. (2010) for more details on how this is estimated.

  4. 4.

    (SIC) The Standard Industrial Classification that represents the principle product manufactured by the plant.

  5. 5.

    Note that for some years no recommendation was implemented in some states since savings and costs were equal to zero.

  6. 6.

    Note that only executed recommendations offer information on energy consumption and emissions.

  7. 7.

    Nominal dollars have been adjusted to the value of 2005 dollars.

  8. 8.

    See http://www.epa.gov/statelocalclimate/index.html

References

  • Abadie, L. M., Ortiz, R. A., & Galarraga, I. (2010). Determinants of energy efficiency investments in the U.S (BC3 Working Paper Series, 17). Bilbao: Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. T., & Newell, R. G. (2004). Information programs for technology adoption: The case of energy-efficiency audits. Resource and Energy Economics, 26, 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, G., Dutrow, E., & Tunnenssen, W. (2008). The evolution of ENERGY STAR® energy performance indicator for benchmarking industrial plant manufacturing energy use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 709–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunse, K., Vodika, M., Schönsleben, P., Brülhart, M., & Ernest, F. O. (2011). Integrating energy efficiency performance in production management – Gap analysis between industrial needs and scientific literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 667–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, H. L. F., Verhoef, E. T., & Nijkamp, P. (2001). Energy saving by firms: Decision-making, barriers and policies. Energy Economics, 23, 717–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCanio, S. J. (1998). The efficiency paradox: Bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments. Energy Policy, 26, 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCanio, S. J., & Watkins, W. E. (1998). Investment in energy efficiency: Do the characteristics of firms matter? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, I. M. (2009). How bad can short termism be?—A study of the consequences of high hurdle discount rates and low payback thresholds. Management Accounting Research, 20, 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhammer, W. (2004). Industrial energy efficiency. In C. J. Cleveland (Ed.), Encyclopedia of energy (pp. 383–393). New York: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40, 3–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (1993). Econometric analysis (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1219–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. B., Haddad, B. M., & Paton, B. (2000). The economics of energy efficiency: Insights from voluntary participation programs. Energy Policy, 28, 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2007). Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO 2 emissions. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2007/tracking_emissions.pdf

  • Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2004). Economics of energy efficiency. Encyclopedia of Energy, 2, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissock, J. K., & Eger, C. (2008). Measuring industrial energy saving. Applied Energy, 85, 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linares, P., & Labandeira, X. (2010). Energy efficiency: Economics and policy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(3), 573–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthulingam, S., Corbett, C. J., Benartzi, S., & Oppenheim, B. (2009). Managerial biases and energy saving: An empirical analysis of the adoption of process improvement recommendations. Working Paper UCLA Anderson School of Management. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1347150

  • Neuhoff, K. (2008). Tackling carbon: How to price carbon for climate policy (Report by Climate Strategies). Cambridge: Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, B. (2001). Efficiency gains within firms under voluntary environmental initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohdin, P., Thollander, P., & Solding, P. (2007). Barriers to and drivers for energy efficiency in the Swedish foundry industry. Energy Policy, 35, 672–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, P., & Söderström, M. (2003). Industrial energy efficiency: The need for investment decision support from a manager perspective. Energy Policy, 31, 1623–1634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thollander, P., & Ottosson, M. (2010). Energy policies for increased industrial energy efficiency: Evaluation of a local energy programme for manufacturing SMEs. Energy Policy, 35, 5774–5783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn, B., & Martin, M. (2000). Industrial energy efficiency decision making. Energy Policy, 28(12), 831–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. E., & Butler, D. M. (2004). A lot more to do: The promise and peril of panel data in political science. Available online at http://www.stanford.edu/class/polisci353/2004spring/reading/wilson_butler.pdf

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ibon Galarraga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table A.1 Summary of data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abadie, L.M., Ortiz, R.A., Galarraga, I., Markandya, A. (2012). Energy Efficiency Policy in the USA: The Impact of the Industrial Assessment Centres (IAC) Programme and State and Regional Climate Policy Actions. In: Costantini, V., Mazzanti, M. (eds) The Dynamics of Environmental and Economic Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5089-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics