Skip to main content

Mapping Miracles: Early Medieval Hagiography and the Potential of GIS

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
History and GIS

Abstract

Medieval history has welcomed the spatial turn, and there is an evidential and historiographical bias towards land and property issues in the field. Several significant collaborative medieval projects make use of GIS, but few individual historians have embraced GIS for early medieval research. GIS makes map-making accessible to anyone, including historians new to the technology, and facilitates the use of maps as research tools rather than simply as outputs. The interrogation of mapped data can reveal spatial patterns in narratives that were previously obscured, raising new research questions and posing new theories. GIS analysis demonstrated a geographical disparity between punitive and positive miracles for Sainte Foy’s miracle collection at Conques, confirming the socio-political outlook of the punitive miracles. At Bobbio, GIS could help solve a mystery surrounding the route taken by a procession of holy relics. If successful this could help clarify important tenth-century political and jurisdictional interactions between Bobbio and other local power brokers. Certain methodological concerns demand closer attention before the early medieval historian might fully commit to GIS. Nevertheless, the potential for revisiting medieval sources with GIS technologies offers exciting possibilities, as much for the individual historian as for larger-scale projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I thank Julia Barrow and Keith Lilley for their comments on an earlier version of this chapter.

  2. 2.

    http://www.qub.ac.uk/urban_mapping/index.htm and http://www.medievalchester.ac.uk/about/, both last accessed March 2012. The resulting publications particularly by Keith Lilley give examples of the implications of the research, for example, Lilley (2009). On the field of HGIS from a historical geographer’s perspective, see Lilley (2011a) and Lilley (2011b).

  3. 3.

    http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/mwgrid/, last accessed March 2012.

  4. 4.

    http://www.lancelot-project.pitt.edu/lancelot-project.html, last accessed March 2012.

  5. 5.

    http://www.goughmap.org, last accessed March 2012, on which see, for example, Lilley and Lloyd (2009) and Lloyd and Lilley (2009).

  6. 6.

    http://darmc.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do, last accessed March 2012.

  7. 7.

    http://www.francia.ahlfeldt.se/index.php, last accessed March 2012.

  8. 8.

    On which, see Layers (2010, 1–3).

  9. 9.

    Good introductions to this are Wickham (1994) and Davies and Fouracre (1995).

  10. 10.

    http://www.york.ac.uk/history/history-in-action/digging-into-data, last accessed March 2012.

  11. 11.

    http://www.langscape.org.uk/index.html, last accessed March 2012.

  12. 12.

    Individual historians are beginning to use GIS for making their own maps, for example, Armstrong (2008, 128); see also the chapter by Alexander von Lünen and the interview with Gunnar Olsson in this volume.

  13. 13.

    As pointed out in Gregory and Ell (2007, 10).

  14. 14.

    The broader context and further references for the arguments made herein are to be found in Taylor (2012).

  15. 15.

    In particular, the debate referring to “feudal revolution”, which began with the seminal study of Duby (1953) and exchange in the pages of Past and Present, sets many of the parameters of the debate: Bisson (1994), Barthélemy and White (1996) and Reuter and Wickham (1997). Literature on different components of the complex paradigm presented by Duby is now vast.

  16. 16.

    The rhetorical nature of medieval hagiographical texts is now fully acknowledged, with terms such as “monastic weapons” and “propaganda” applied to them: Rosenwein et al. (1991, 765), Ward (1987, 2) and Rollason (1985, 90).

  17. 17.

    A concept originally advocated in Lauwers (2005). See also Devroey and Lauwers (2007).

  18. 18.

    Bresslau (1934), henceforth MSC.

  19. 19.

    “Viewshed analysis” is a standard function to be found in most GIS packages.

  20. 20.

    A practice also known elsewhere on the continent: Dreslerová and Mikuláš (2010).

  21. 21.

    The most recent edition of the Latin text is that of Robertini (1994), hereon as LMSF. It is translated by Sheingorn (1995). On dating and authorship, see Robertini (1994).

  22. 22.

    Those remaining for Sainte-Foy are mainly held in the Conques cartulary, cf. Desjardins (1879).

  23. 23.

    See the interview with Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie in this book about the re-districting of France in the wake of the French Revolution.

  24. 24.

    Foy’s punishment miracles should be considered a “vengeance script” (White, 2006, 172). Vengeance itself was part of normative feuding activity which was constructive in the building of power relations, as much as it could be destructive, for which the classic study is Miller (1990).

  25. 25.

    See also the chapter by Alexander von Lünen in this book for a discussion on this issue; Alexi Baker and Detlev Mares/Wolfgang Moschek also discuss this briefly in their respective chapters.

  26. 26.

    See, for example, Margary (1973) and Talbert and Elliott (2010).

  27. 27.

    See Ortenberg (1990) and Masschaele (1993). Other useful resources for this include Matthews (2007) and Renouard (1968).

  28. 28.

    Bedos-Rezak (1994, 322). Mindful that these documents present methodological issues in their own right, due to the conscious and discriminate editing of their compilers and the process of copying, cartularies are nevertheless an extraordinary resource for a time period in which dense records do not survive (Cf. Guyotjeannin et al. (1993) and Kosto and Winroth (2002)).

  29. 29.

    A process recently studied and re-dated by Le Jan (2000, 58).

  30. 30.

    Recent computer technology has been used to help date medieval records, such as one strand of the Documents of Early England Data Set (DEEDS) project; see, for example, Spencer (2002).

  31. 31.

    On creating historical gazetteers, see Mostern and Johnson (2008) and Mostern (2008).

  32. 32.

    http://www.davidrumsey.com, last accessed March 2012, see also Rumsey and Williams (2002, 16) and also http://www.oldmapsonline.org, last accessed March 2012.

  33. 33.

    Talbert (2000); for a list of the latter’s sources, see http://www.early-medieval-gis.blogspot.fr/, last accessed March 2012.

  34. 34.

    http://demo.geogarage.com/cassini/ or http://webservices.cartosphere.com/, both last accessed March 2012.

References

  1. Armstrong J (2008) Local society and the defence of the English frontier in fifteenth-century Scotland: the war measures of 1482. Florilegium 25:127–149

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barthélemy D, White SD (1996) Debate: the ‘feudal revolution’: I and II. Past & Present 152:196–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bedos-Rezak B (1994) Diplomatic sources and medieval documentary practices: an essay in interpretative methodology. In: van Engen J (ed) The past and future of medieval studies, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (In.), pp 313–343

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bisson TN (1994) The feudal revolution. Past & Present 142:6–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bresslau H (1934) Miracula sancti Columbani. MGH Scr 30(II):993–1015

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davies W, Fouracre P (eds) (1995) Property and power in the early middle ages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Desjardins G (ed) (1879) Cartulaire de l’abbaye de Conques en Rouergue. Picard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  8. Devroey JP, Lauwers M (2007) L’espace des historiens medievistes: quelques remarques en guise de conclusion. In: Abbé JL (ed) Construction de l’espace au moyen age : pratiques et representations: XXXVIIe congrès de la SHMES: Mulhouse, 2–4 June 2006, Publications de la Sorbonne, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dreslerová D, Mikuláš R (2010) An early medieval symbol carved on a tree trunk: pathfinder or territorial marker? Antiquity 84:1067–1075

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duby G (1953) La société aux XIe et XIIIe siècles dans la région Mâconnaise. Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gregory IS, Ell PS (2007) Historical GIS: technologies, methodologies and scholarship. Cambridge Studies in Historical Geography, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Guyotjeannin O, Morelle L, Parisse M (eds) (1993) Les cartulaires: actes de la table ronde organisée par l’École Nationale des Chartes et le G.D.R. 121 du C.N.R.S. Ecoles des Chartes, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kosto A, Winroth A (eds) (2002) Charters, cartularies and archives: the preservation and transmission of documents in the Medieval West. Pontificial Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lauwers M (2005) Naissance du cimetière. Lieux sacrés et terre des morts dans l’Occident médiéval. Aubier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  15. Layers E (2010) Turning toward place, space and time. In: Bodenhamer DJ, Corrigan J, Harris TM (eds) The spatial humanities: GIS and the future of humanities scholarship. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Le Jan R (2000) Continuity and change in the tenth-century nobility. In: Duggan A (ed) Nobles and nobility in medieval Europe: concepts, origins, transformations. Boydell, Woodbridge, pp 53–68

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lilley K (2009) City and cosmos: the medieval world in Urban form. Reaktion, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lilley K (2011a) Digital cartographies and medieval geographies. In: Daniels S, DeLyser D, Entrikin JN, Richardson D (eds) Envisioning landscapes, making worlds: geography and the humanities. Routledge, London/New York, pp 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lilley K (2011b) Geography’s medieval history: a forgotten enterprise? Dialog Hum Geography 1(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lilley K, Lloyd C (2009) Mapping the realm: a new look at the Gough Map of Britain (c.1360). Imago Mundi 61(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lloyd C, Lilley K (2009) Cartographic veracity in medieval mapping: analyzing geographical variation in the Gough map of Great Britain. Ann Assoc Am Geograp 99(1):27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Margary I (1973) Roman roads in Britain, 3rd edn. Baker, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Masschaele J (1993) Transport costs in medieval England. Econ Hist Rev 46:266–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matthews S (2007) Travel and travellers between England and Italy in the Anglo-Saxon centuries. Archaeopress, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller W (1990) Bloodtaking and peacemaking: feud, law, and society in Saga Iceland. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mostern R (2008) Historical gazetteers: an experiential perspective, with examples from Chinese history. Histor Method 41(1):39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mostern R, Johnson I (2008) From named place to naming event: creating gazetteers for history. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 22(10):1091–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nuvolone F (2000) Viaggiatori e pellegrini a Bobbio all’inizio ai miracula Columbani. Archivum Bobiense 3:73–119

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ogilby J (1675) Britannia volume the first. Or, An illustration of the kingdom of England and dominion of Wales: by a geographical and historical description of the principal roads thereof. Printed by the author, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ortenberg V (1990) Archbishop Sigeric’s journey to Rome in 990. Anglo-Saxon England 19:197–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Renouard Y (1968) Etudes d’histoire medieval, vol 2. S.E.V.P.E.N., Paris

    Google Scholar 

  32. Reuter T, Wickham C (1997) Debate: the ‘feudal revolution’, III and IV. Past & Present 155:177–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Robertini L (1994) Liber miraculorum sancte fidis. Centro italiano di studi sull’alto Medioevo, Spoleto

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rollason D (1985) The miracles of St. Benedict: a window on early medieval France. In: Mayr-Harting H, Moore R (eds) Studies in medieval history presented to R.H.C. Davis. Hambledon, London, pp 73–90

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenwein B (1989) To be the neighbor of Saint Peter: the social meaning of Cluny’s property, 909–1049. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenwein BH, Head T, Farmer SA (1991) Monks and their enemies: a comparative approach. Speculum 66:764–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rumsey D, Williams M (2002) Historical maps in GIS. In: Knowles AK (ed) Past time, past place. GIS for History, ESRI, Redlands, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sheingorn P (1995) Book of Sainte Foy. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sigal PA (1985) L’homme et le miracle dans la France médiévale: XIe-XIIe siècle. Editions du Cerf, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spencer A (2002) Dating charters using textual evidence. In: Keats-Rohan KS (ed) Resourcing sources. The use of computers in developing prosopographical methodology, prosopographica et genealogica, vol 7. Unit for Prosopographical Research, Linacre College/University of Oxford, Oxford, pp 193–200

    Google Scholar 

  41. Talbert R (2000) Barrington atlas of the Greek and Roman world. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  42. Talbert RJA, Elliott T (2010) Rome’s world: the Peutinger map reconsidered. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  43. Taylor F (2012) Miracula, Saints’ cults and socio-political landscapes: Bobbio, Conques and post-Carolingian society. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  44. Theuws F, Jong MD, van Rhijn C (eds) (2001) Topographies of power in the Early Middle Ages. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tosi M (1981) Il trasferimento di S. Colombano da Bobbio a Pavia : 17–30 luglio [929]. Archivum Bobiense 3:129–150

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ward B (1987) Miracles and the medieval mind: theory, record and event 1000–1215, Rev. edn. Wildwood House, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  47. White S (2006) Garsinde v. Sainte Foy: argumentation, threat and vengeance in eleventh-century monastic litigation. In: Jamroziak E, Burton JE (eds) Religious and laity in western Europe, 1000–1400: interaction, negotiation, and power. Europa sacra, vol 2. Brepols, Turnhout, pp 169–182

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wickham C (1994) Land and power: studies in Italian and European social history, 400–1200. British School at Rome, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faye Taylor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, F. (2013). Mapping Miracles: Early Medieval Hagiography and the Potential of GIS. In: von Lünen, A., Travis, C. (eds) History and GIS. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5009-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics