Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

GIS and Research Into Historical “Spaces of Practice”: Overcoming the Epistemological Barriers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
History and GIS

Abstract

Henri Lefebvre’s argument that “(social) space is a (social) product” inadequately theorized in terms of its surface geometry has been highly influential in inspiring the “spatial turn” in social theory that has made such an impact on historical studies. The development of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) as a method available to historical geographers and historians stands in ambivalent relation to this project. On the one hand Historical GIS (HGIS) offers historians a powerful way to organize, query and visualize spatial data, enabling them to “think spatially”. On the other hand, it comprises a technically complex set of quantitative methods that is vulnerable to the accusation that it sustains the formalist fallacies of modernism and the division of space into exclusive “subjective” and “objective” epistemologies that Lefebvre did so much to overcome. This chapter does not seek either to vindicate or condemn the use of GIS in historical research so much as to raise a series of epistemological issues that arise for traditional modes of historical explanation when doing so and to argue that these require further consideration. It is argued that if these can be addressed, a significant contribution of HGIS to future historical research lies in its potential to provide an appropriate methodological platform for the identification of rich descriptions of historical “spaces of practice” through archive-based empirical research. Such spatial descriptions that pertain primarily to the non-representational qualities of everyday practices and touch on the embodied nature of historical experience can help to redress the prevailing emphasis on modes of spatial representation. However, the challenge remains for HGIS to avoid an uncritical emphasis on visualization and to encourage the emergence of an open-ended method for including spatial description in historical explanation while avoiding simplistic models of environmental causation in which the “spatial” and the “social” become artificially polarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This interesting process that the philosopher of science Hacking (1983) calls “the creation of phenomena” will be returned to later in this chapter.

  2. 2.

    Cf. Kingston (2010), Biernacki and Jordan (2002) and Gunn and Morris (2001).

  3. 3.

    Cf. Lefebvre (1991 [1974]), Bourdieu (1990), Giddens (1984) and Harvey (1973).

  4. 4.

    For example Shoemaker (2004) and Gunn (2000), or Corfield (1990).

  5. 5.

    See Griffiths (2008); also Tuan (1978).

  6. 6.

    Hoskins (1955), Beresford (1967) and Dyos (1961); see also Ell (2011).

  7. 7.

    The chapter by von Lünen raises some epistemological issues involved in historical “reconstruction”.

  8. 8.

    My thanks to Charles Travis for this useful formulation.

  9. 9.

    See von Lünen’s chapter for a discussion of Sombart’s idea.

  10. 10.

    See “Towards Successful Suburban Town Centres” Project, UCL. Funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Ref: EP/D06595X/1. http://gow.epsrc.ac.uk/NGBOViewGrant.aspx?GrantRef=EP/D06595X/1, last accessed 22 Apr 2012.

References

  1. Baker ARH (2003) Geography and history: bridging the divide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley M (2006) Past and presence: revisiting historical ontology. Hist Theory 45:349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beresford M (1967) New towns of the middle ages: town plantation in England, Wales and Gascony. Lutterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biernacki R, Jordan J (2002) The place of space in the study of the social. In: Joyce P (ed) The social in question: new bearings in history and the social sciences. Routledge, London/New York, pp 133–150

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Braudel F (1976) The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean world in the age of Philip II, vol 2. Harper & Row, New York/London. Translated by S. Reynolds

    Google Scholar 

  7. Braudel F (1980) On history. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London. Translated by S. Matthews

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cannadine D (1977) Victorian cities how different? Soc Hist 2:114–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Conzen MRG (1960) Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers, Publication 27, George Philip, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conzen MP (2010) The elusive common denominator in understanding urban form. Urban Morphol 14(1):55–58

    Google Scholar 

  11. Corfield P (1990) Walking the city streets: the urban Odyssey in eighteenth-century England. J Urban Hist 16(2):132–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Darnton R (1984) The great cat massacre and other episodes in French cultural history. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dyos H (1961) Victorian suburb: a study of the growth of Camberwell. Leicester University Press, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ell P (2011) Local history in the twenty-first century: information communication technology, e-resources, grid computing, Web 2.0 and a new paradigm. In: Dyer C, Hopper A, Lord E, Tringham N (eds) New directions in local history since Hoskins. University of Hertforshire Press, Hatfield, pp 247–266

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gaddis JL (2002) The landscape of history. How historians map the past. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gardiner P (1961) The nature of historical explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gibson J (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston/London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gieryn T (2000) A space for place in sociology. Ann Rev Sociol 26:463–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gregory IS, Ell PS (2007) Historical GIS: technologies, methodologies and scholarship. Cambridge Studies in Historical Geography, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Griffiths S (2008) Historical space and the interpretation of urban transformation: the spatiality of social and cultural change in Sheffield c1770–1910. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Griffiths S (2010) Spatial transformation and urban culture in Sheffield c.1750–1830: patterns of change and continuity in civic ceremonial and popular processions. Unpublished paper presented at annual British society of eighteenth century studies 39th conference, St Hugh’s College, Oxford, 5–7 January 2010

    Google Scholar 

  23. Griffiths S (2011a) Temporality in Hillier and Hanson’s theory of spatial description: some implications of historical research for space syntax. J Space Syntax 1(2):73–96

    Google Scholar 

  24. Griffiths S (2011b) The use of space syntax in historical research: current practice and future possibilities. In: Proceedings of the eighth international space syntax symposium, Santiago, pp 1–26. http://www.sss8.cl/media/upload/paginas/seccion/8193_1.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2012

  25. Griffiths S (2012) Public funeral processions and community identity in nineteenth-century Sheffield: the eighteenth-century as a period of transition between aristocratic and civic traditions. Unpublished paper presented to the annual conference of the social history society, University of Brighton 3–5 April 2012

    Google Scholar 

  26. Griffiths S, Jones C, Vaughan L, Haklay M (2010) The persistence of suburban centres in Greater London: combining Conzenian and space syntax approaches. Urban Morphol 14(2):85–99

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guildi J (2011) The roads to power. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gunn S (2000) The public culture of the Victorian middle class. Ritual and authority and the english industrial city 1840–1914. Manchester University Press, Manchester/New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gunn S, Faire L (eds) (2012) Research methods for history. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gunn S, Morris R (eds) (2001) Identities in space: contested terrains in the western city since 1850. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hacking I (1983) Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Harvey D (1973) Social justice and the city. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hillier B (1996) Space is the machine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hillier B (2008) Space and spatiality: what the built environment needs from social theory. Constr Res Inf 36(3):216–230

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hillier B, Hanson J (1984) The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Hillier B, Leaman A (1973) The man-environment paradigm and its paradoxes. Archit Des 43:507–511

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hillier B, Vaughan L (2007) The city as one thing. Prog Plan 67(3):205–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoskins W (1955) The making of the english landscape. Hodder and Stoughton, London

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jerram L (2011) Streetlife: the untold history of Europe’s twentieth century. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jones B (2006) Recreating nineteenth century Sheffield: The Sheffield urban study project. http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/matshef/pbj/MSpbj.htm. Last accessed 31 Mar 2012

  41. Joyce P (2003) The rule of the freedom: liberalism and the modern city. Verso, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kingston R (2010) Mind over matter? History and the spatial turn. Cult Soc Hist 7(1):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lefebvre H (1991 [1974]) The production of space. Carlton & Blackwell, Malden/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lilley K (2012) GIS, spatial technologies and digital mapping. In: Gunn S, Faire L (eds) Research methods for history. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 121–140

    Google Scholar 

  45. Massey D (2005) For space. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mayne A, Murray T (eds) (2001) The Archaeology of urban landscapes: explorations in slumland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  47. McDonald S (2006) Materializing Sheffield. http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/matshef/index.html. Last accessed 31 Mar 2012

  48. Netto V (2008) Practice, space, and the duality of meaning. Environ Plan D Soc Space 26(2):359–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pooley C (2000) Patterns on the ground: urban form, residential structure and the social construction of space. In: Daunton M (ed) The Cambridge urban history of Britain, vol 3, 1840–1950. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 429–465

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shoemaker R (2004) The London mob: violence and disorder in eighteenth-century England. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  51. Thrift N (2008) Non-representational theory: space, politics, affect. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tilley C (1994) A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths and monuments. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tuan Y (1978) Space, time, place: a humanistic frame. In: Carlstein T, Parkes D, Thrift N (eds) Making sense of time. Timing space and spacing time, vol 1. Wiley, Chichester, pp 7–20

    Google Scholar 

  54. Urry J (2007) Mobilities. Polity, Cambridge/Malden

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vaughan L, Griffiths S, Haklay M, Jones C (2009) Do the suburbs exist? Discovering complexity and specificity in suburban built form. Trans Inst Br Geograp 34(4):475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of the Built Environment, University College London, London, UK

    Sam Griffiths

Authors
  1. Sam Griffiths
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Griffiths .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Geography, University of Portsmouth, Lion Terrace, Buckingham Building, Portsmouth, PO1 3HE, United Kingdom

    Alexander von Lünen

  2. , Trinity College, University of Dublin, Trinity Long Room Hub, Dublin, Ireland

    Charles Travis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Griffiths, S. (2013). GIS and Research Into Historical “Spaces of Practice”: Overcoming the Epistemological Barriers. In: von Lünen, A., Travis, C. (eds) History and GIS. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5009-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation