Skip to main content

Baroque Modes and the Production of Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science in the Age of Baroque

Abstract

In his Art of Painting (Fig. 1.1) Johannes Vermeer opens a curtain and lets the observer peek at the crafting of an image. The lavishly dressed painter, his back to the observer, is busy putting to paper the figure of Clio, the muse of history, draped in blue and holding the symbols of her art: the book and the trumpet. On the wall behind her is an elaborate map of the Netherlands (the west facing up), framed by miniature depictions of Dutch towns. Vermeer “juxtapose[s] two kinds of pictorial image” wrote Svetlana Alpers of this painting in her deservedly celebrated analysis: an image fraught with “meanings (art as emblem)” on the one hand, and on the other—an image which serves as a careful “description (art as mapping)” (Alpers 1984, 166). But Vermeer is not commenting on art alone. “The aim of Dutch painters was to capture on a surface a great range of knowledge and information about the world” (Alpers 1984, 122), and Vermeer is setting a contrast between two modes of knowledge: the theatrical, poetic, historical narrative represented by Clio; and the visual exactness and immediacy of the descriptio—the mathematically drawn, factual map (Alpers 1984, 119–123; 166–167).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alpers, Svetlana. 1984. The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal, Mieke. 2001. Quoting Caravaggio: Contemporary art, preposterous history. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1963. Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buci-Glucksmann, Christine. 1994. Baroque reason: The aesthetic of modernity (trans: Camiller, P.; intr: B.S. Turner). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R.G. 1945. The idea of nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croce, Benedetto. 1990. Benedetto croce: Essays on literature and literary criticism (trans. and ann: Moss, M.E.). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, Alistair C. 1994. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwik. 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact (trans: Bradley, F. and T.J. Trenn), ed. T.S. Kuhn and R.K. Merton. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2005. Metaphysical images and mathematical practices: The archaeology of the inverse square law part I. History of Science xliii: 391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2006. The use and non-use of mathematics: The archaeology of the inverse square law part II. History of Science xliv: 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2010a. Baroque optics and the disappearance of the observer. Journal of History of Ideas 71(2): 191–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2010b. Empiricism without the senses: How the instrument replaced the eye. In The body as object and instrument of knowledge, ed. O. Gal and C. Wolfe, 121–148. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2011. The controversy over the comets: What was it really about? In Controversies in the scientific revolution, ed. Victor Boantza and Marcelo Dascal, 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2012. Baroque science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2012. Nature’s drawing. Synthese 185(3): 429–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootenboer, Hanneke. 2005. The rhetoric of perspective: Realism and illusionism in seventeenth-century Dutch still-life painting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. 1982. Language, truth and reason. In Rationality and relativism, ed. M. Hollis and S. Lukes, 48–66. Oxford: Blackwell: [Enlarged in: Styles of scientific reasoning, In Post-analytic philosophy, ed. J. Rajchmann, and West C, 146–165. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. 1992a. ‘Style’ for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23(1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. 1992b. Statistical language, statistical truth and statistical reason: The self-authentification of a style of scientific reasoning. In The social dimensions of science, ed.E. McMullin, 130–157. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A.R. 1962 (2nd ed.). The scientific revolution 1500–1800: The formation of the modern scientific attitude. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallyn, Fernand. 1993. The poetic structure of the world: Copernicus and Kepler. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maravall, José Antonio. 1986. The culture of the baroque: Analysis of a historical structure (trans: Cochran, Terry). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panofsky, Erwin. 1995. What is baroque? In Three essays on criticism, ed. Irving Lavin, 17–90. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweber S., and M. Wachter. 2000. Complex systems, modelling and simulation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31(4): 583–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigerist, Henry E. 1929. William Harvey’s Stellung in der Europaeischer Geistesgeschichte. Archives der Kulturgeschichte 19: 158–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellek, René. 1963. The concept of baroque in literary scholarship. In Concepts of criticism, 69–127. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Helen C., et al. 1971. Seventeenth-century verse and prose, vol. 1. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wölfflin, Heinrich. 1950. Principles of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art. Mineola: Dover Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ofer Gal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gal, O., Chen-Morris, R. (2012). Baroque Modes and the Production of Knowledge. In: Gal, O., Chen-Morris, R. (eds) Science in the Age of Baroque. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 208. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4807-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics