Abstract
In his Art of Painting (Fig. 1.1) Johannes Vermeer opens a curtain and lets the observer peek at the crafting of an image. The lavishly dressed painter, his back to the observer, is busy putting to paper the figure of Clio, the muse of history, draped in blue and holding the symbols of her art: the book and the trumpet. On the wall behind her is an elaborate map of the Netherlands (the west facing up), framed by miniature depictions of Dutch towns. Vermeer “juxtapose[s] two kinds of pictorial image” wrote Svetlana Alpers of this painting in her deservedly celebrated analysis: an image fraught with “meanings (art as emblem)” on the one hand, and on the other—an image which serves as a careful “description (art as mapping)” (Alpers 1984, 166). But Vermeer is not commenting on art alone. “The aim of Dutch painters was to capture on a surface a great range of knowledge and information about the world” (Alpers 1984, 122), and Vermeer is setting a contrast between two modes of knowledge: the theatrical, poetic, historical narrative represented by Clio; and the visual exactness and immediacy of the descriptio—the mathematically drawn, factual map (Alpers 1984, 119–123; 166–167).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alpers, Svetlana. 1984. The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bal, Mieke. 2001. Quoting Caravaggio: Contemporary art, preposterous history. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Benjamin, Walter. 1963. Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Buci-Glucksmann, Christine. 1994. Baroque reason: The aesthetic of modernity (trans: Camiller, P.; intr: B.S. Turner). London: Sage Publications.
Collingwood, R.G. 1945. The idea of nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Croce, Benedetto. 1990. Benedetto croce: Essays on literature and literary criticism (trans. and ann: Moss, M.E.). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Crombie, Alistair C. 1994. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. London: Duckworth.
Fleck, Ludwik. 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact (trans: Bradley, F. and T.J. Trenn), ed. T.S. Kuhn and R.K. Merton. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2005. Metaphysical images and mathematical practices: The archaeology of the inverse square law part I. History of Science xliii: 391–414.
Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2006. The use and non-use of mathematics: The archaeology of the inverse square law part II. History of Science xliv: 49–68.
Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2010a. Baroque optics and the disappearance of the observer. Journal of History of Ideas 71(2): 191–217.
Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2010b. Empiricism without the senses: How the instrument replaced the eye. In The body as object and instrument of knowledge, ed. O. Gal and C. Wolfe, 121–148. New York: Springer Verlag.
Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2011. The controversy over the comets: What was it really about? In Controversies in the scientific revolution, ed. Victor Boantza and Marcelo Dascal, 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2012. Baroque science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2012. Nature’s drawing. Synthese 185(3): 429–466.
Grootenboer, Hanneke. 2005. The rhetoric of perspective: Realism and illusionism in seventeenth-century Dutch still-life painting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1982. Language, truth and reason. In Rationality and relativism, ed. M. Hollis and S. Lukes, 48–66. Oxford: Blackwell: [Enlarged in: Styles of scientific reasoning, In Post-analytic philosophy, ed. J. Rajchmann, and West C, 146–165. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985].
Hacking, Ian. 1992a. ‘Style’ for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23(1): 1–20.
Hacking, Ian. 1992b. Statistical language, statistical truth and statistical reason: The self-authentification of a style of scientific reasoning. In The social dimensions of science, ed.E. McMullin, 130–157. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hall, A.R. 1962 (2nd ed.). The scientific revolution 1500–1800: The formation of the modern scientific attitude. London: Longman.
Hallyn, Fernand. 1993. The poetic structure of the world: Copernicus and Kepler. New York: Zone Books.
Maravall, José Antonio. 1986. The culture of the baroque: Analysis of a historical structure (trans: Cochran, Terry). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Panofsky, Erwin. 1995. What is baroque? In Three essays on criticism, ed. Irving Lavin, 17–90. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Schweber S., and M. Wachter. 2000. Complex systems, modelling and simulation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31(4): 583–609.
Sigerist, Henry E. 1929. William Harvey’s Stellung in der Europaeischer Geistesgeschichte. Archives der Kulturgeschichte 19: 158–68.
Wellek, René. 1963. The concept of baroque in literary scholarship. In Concepts of criticism, 69–127. New Haven: Yale University Press.
White, Helen C., et al. 1971. Seventeenth-century verse and prose, vol. 1. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Wölfflin, Heinrich. 1950. Principles of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art. Mineola: Dover Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gal, O., Chen-Morris, R. (2012). Baroque Modes and the Production of Knowledge. In: Gal, O., Chen-Morris, R. (eds) Science in the Age of Baroque. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 208. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4807-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4807-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4806-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4807-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)