Abstract
Studying Vygotskij’s ideas from his earlier work such as “The Psychology of Art” to his later work (“Thinking and Speech”) is a fascinating experience of immersion in a world of ideas. The evolution of some of these ideas can be followed throughout his work (like the notion of ‘zone of proximal development’, or ‘sign’); others remain notions expressed in common language not yet transformed into academic concepts (like activity, leading activity, play). It was the work of his colleagues and followers to develop these ideas further into a coherent theory of human development. Leont’ev, for example, elaborated the notion of activity (dejatel’nost’) and leading activity (veduščaja dejatel’nost’) into an activity theory; El’konin has developed the notion of play and leading activity into a theory of ontogenetic development; Božovic worked on the notions of personality and the social situation of development; Zaporožec contributed significantly to the elaboration of the theories of movement and perception, and so on. The evolution of Vygotskij’s ideas has been described in a number of accomplished works (Kozulin 1990; van der Veer and Valsiner 1991; Wertsch 1985; see for a brief historical summary regarding early childhood education: Veraksa and van Oers 2011). Diverse readings of Vygotskij still exist (see for example van Oers 2011).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind. The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.
Cazden, C. B. (1996). Selective traditions: Readings of Vygotsky in writing pedagogy. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning and schooling (pp. 165–187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chaiklin, S. (2011a). The role of practice in cultural-historical science. In M. Kontopodis, C. Wulf, & B. Fichtner (Eds.), Children, development and education. Cultural, historical and anthropological perspectives (pp. 227–246). Dordrecht: Springer.
Chaiklin, S. (2011b). Social scientific research and societal practice: Action research and cultural-historical research in methodological light from Kurt Lewin and Lev S. Vygotsky. Mind, Culture and Activity, 18(2), 129–147.
Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. London: Routledge.
Dolya, G. (2010). Vygotsky in action in the early years. The “Key to Learning” curriculum. New York: Routledge.
Fleer, M. (2010). Early learning and development. Cultural-historical concepts of play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology. A biography of ideas. Brighton: HarvesterWheatsheaf.
Tuna, A., & Hayden, J. (Eds.). (2010). Early childhood programs as the doorway to social cohesion. Application of Vygotsky’s ideas from an East-West perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
van der Veer, R. (2008). Multiple readings of Vygotsky. In B. van Oers, W. Wardekker, E. Elbers, & R. van der Veer (Eds.), The transformation of learning. Advances in cultural-historical activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky. A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Oers, B. (2009). Developmental education: improving participation in cultural practices. In M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard, & J. Tudge (Eds.), Childhood studies and the impact of globalization: Policies and practices at global and local levels – World Yearbook of Education 2009 (pp. 293–317). New York: Routledge.
van Oers, B. (2010a). Children’s enculturation through play. In L. Brooker & S. Edwards (Eds.), Engaging play (pp. 195–209). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
van Oers, B. (2010b). The emergence of mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 23–37.
van Oers, B. (2011). Where is the child? Controversy in the Neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18, 84–88.
van Oers, B., & Duijkers, D. (2012). Teaching in a play-based curriculum: Theory, practice and evidence of Developmental Education for young children. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(1), 1–24.
Veraksa, N., & van Oers, B. (2011). Early childhood Education from a Russian perspective. Editorial to the special issue. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(1), 5–18.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Educational psychology. Boca Raton: St Lucie Press.
Wardekker, W. L. (2000). Criteria for the quality of inquiry. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 259–272.
Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Oers, B. (2012). Conclusion: Actual and Future Consequences of Implementing and Researching Developmental Education. In: van Oers, B. (eds) Developmental Education for Young Children. International perspectives on early childhood education and development, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4617-6_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4617-6_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4616-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4617-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)