Skip to main content

Assessment of Airway Hyperresponsiveness: Comparison of Spirometry and Body Plethysmography

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Respiratory Regulation - Clinical Advances

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 755))

Abstract

While methacholine (MCH) testing is commonly used in the clinical diagnosis of asthma, the detection of airway narrowing often relies on either spirometry or body plethysmography, however comparative studies are rare. In this study we performed MCH testing in 37 patients with variable shortness of breath at work and in 37 patients with no history of airway disease. The inclusion criteria were: no acute respiratory infection within 6 weeks, no severe diseases, normal baseline specific airway resistance (sRaw), normal baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), Tiffeneau index >70%, no previous treatment with steroids within 14 days and no short acting bronchodilators within 24 h. Cumulative doses of 0.003, 0.014, 0.059, 0.239 and 0.959 mg MCH were inhaled by a dosimeter method. A FEV1 decrease of ≥20% from baseline and a 100% increase of sRaw to ≥2.0 kPa/s was defined as end-of-test-criterion. Provocation doses were calculated by interpolation. Performance of lung function parameters was compared using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis. ROC analysis resulted in an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.74 for FEV1 vs. 0.82 for sRaw. The corresponding Youden Indices (J) were 0.46 for FEV1 and 0.57 for sRaw. The Youden Index of sRaw was higher and sensitivity and specificity (73%/84%) were rather well-balanced, in contrast to FEV1 (54%/92%). In conclusion, in cumulative MCH challenges sRaw was found to be the overall most useful parameter for the detection of bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Body plethysmography yielded a balanced sensitivity-specificity ratio with higher sensitivity than spirometry, but comparable specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, S. D., Charlton, B., Weiler, J. M., Nicols, S., Spector, S. L., Pearlman, D. S., & A 305 Study Grroup. (2009). Comparison of mannitol and methacholine to predict exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a clinical diagnosis of asthma. Respiratory Research, 10, 4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baur, X., Nowak, D., Triebig, G., & Schneider, J. (2005). Arbeitsmedizinische Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Arbeitsmedizin und Umweltmedizin eV-Lungenfunktionsprüfungen in der Arbeitsmedizin. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed, 40(6), 358–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockcroft, D. W., & Berscheid, B. A. (1983). Measurement of responsiveness to inhaled histamine: Comparison of FEV1 and SGaw. Annals of Allergy, 51(3), 374–377.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cockcroft, D. W., & Davis, B. E. (2006). The bronchoprotective effect of inhaling methacholine by using total lung capacity inspirations has a marked influence on the interpretation of the test result. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 117(6), 1244–1248.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cockcroft, D. W., Killian, D. N., Mellon, J. J. A., & Hargreave, F. E. (1977). Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: A method and clinical survey. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 7(3), 235–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cockcroft, D. W., Berscheid, B. A., & Murdock, K. Y. (1983). Unimodal distribution of bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine in a random human population. Chest, 83(5), 751–754.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crapo, R. O., Casaburi, R., Coates, A. L., Enright, P. L., Hankinson, J. L., Irvin, C. G., MacIntyre, N. R., McKay, R. T., Wanger, J. S., Anderson, S. D., Cockcroft, D. W., Fish, J. E., & Sterk, P. (2000). Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 161(1), 309–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criée, C. P., Sorichter, S., Smith, H. J., Kardos, P., Merget, R., Heise, D., Berdel, D., Köhler, D., Magnussen, H., Marek, W., Mitfessel, H., Rasche, K., Rolke, M., Worth, H., Jörres, R. A., & Working Group for Body Plethysmography of the German Society for Pneumology and Respiratory Care. (2011). Body plethysmography – Its principles and clinical use. Respiratory Medicine, 105(7), 959–971.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, M., Pfeiffer, D., & Smith, R. D. (2000). Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 45(1–2), 23–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, D. J., Fabbri, L. M., Hughes, J. M., Banks, D. E., Barkman, H. W. Jr., Connolly, M. J., Jones, R. N., & Weill, H. (1986). Modification of the methacholine inhalation test and its epidemiologic use in polyurethane workers. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 133(4), 600–604.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5(3), 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juniper, E. F., Frith, P. A., & Hargreave, F. E. (1981). Airway responsiveness to histamine and methacholine: Relationship to minimum treatment to control symptoms of asthma. Thorax, 36(8), 575–579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid, I., Morris, Z. Q., & Digiovine, B. (2009). Specific conductance criteria for a positive methacholine challenge test: Are the American Thoracic Society guidelines rather generous? Respiratory Care, 54(9), 1168–1174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lötvall, J., Inman, M., & O’Byrne, P. (1998). Measurement of airway hyperresponsiveness: New considerations. Thorax, 53(5), 419–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merget, R., Jörres, R. A., Heinze, E., Haufs, M. G., Taeger, D., & Brüning, T. (2009). Development of a 1-concentration-4-step dosimeter protocol for methacholine testing. Respiratory Medicine, 103(4), 607–613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nadel, J. A., & Tierney, D. F. (1961). Effect of a previous deep inspiration on airway resistance in man. Journal of Applied Physiology, 16, 717–719.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, G., Sparrow, D., Taylor, D., Segal, M., & Weiss, S. (1987). Analysis of dose–response curves to methacholine. An approach suitable for population studies. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 136(6), 1412–1417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popa, V., & Singleton, J. (1988). Provocation dose and discriminant analysis in histamine bronchoprovocation. Are the current predictive data satisfactory? Chest, 94(3), 466–475.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schisterman, E. F., Perkins, N. J., Liu, A., & Bondell, H. (2005). Optimal cut-point and its corresponding Youden Index to discriminate individuals using pooled blood samples. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 16(1), 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N., & Lengauer, T. (2005). ROCR: Visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 21(20), 3940–3941.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slats, A. M., Janssen, K., van Schadewijk, A., van der Plas, D. T., Schot, R., van den Aardweg, J. G., de Jongste, J. C., Hiemstra, P. S., Mauad, T., Rabe, K. F., & Sterk P. J. (2007). Bronchial inflammation and airway responses to deep inspiration in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 176(2), 121–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sterk, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Quanjer, P. H., Cockcroft, D. W., O’Byrne, P. M., Anderson, S. D., Juniper, E. F., & Malo, J. L. (1993). Airway responsiveness. Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. European Respiratory Journal, 16, 53–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffeneau, D. R. (1957). Examen pulmonaire de l’asthmatique, déductions diagnostiques, pronostiques et thérapeutiques, par Robert Tiffeneau (pp. 55–75). Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Lende, R., Visser, B. F., Wever-Hess, J., de Vries, K., & Orie, N. G. (1973). Distribution of histamine threshold values in a random population. Revue de l’Institut D’hygiène Des Mines (Hasselt), 28(4), 186–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, A. J., Peat, J. K., Salome, C. M., Yan, K., Anderson, S. D., Schoeffel, R. E., McCowage, G., & Killalea, T. (1987). Prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma in a rural adult population. Thorax, 42(5), 361.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Merget .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nensa, F., Kotschy-Lang, N., Smith, HJ., Marek, W., Merget, R. (2013). Assessment of Airway Hyperresponsiveness: Comparison of Spirometry and Body Plethysmography. In: Pokorski, M. (eds) Respiratory Regulation - Clinical Advances. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 755. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4546-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics