Skip to main content

Sustainability Standards and Their Implications for Agroecology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Agriculture, Conservation and Ecotourism: Societal Influences

Abstract

Agroecology has helped produce a movement where consumers are concerned about more than price. The qualities sought include the process by which a product is grown or produced. When supply-chains are long, it is difficult to know whether to believe any particular production quality claimed on a label. This review describes the evolution of market, government (state) and civil society efforts to devise credible certification schemes that would allow consumers to use their dollars to build healthy ecosystems that are socially just and economically secure for producers and workers. Market groups now control governmentally sanctioned certifiers, such as the International Standards Organization and the ISO 14000 family of standards, regulation and enforcement mechanisms. At the same time, numerous market-led and civil-society led certifying efforts are competing to determine what is ecologically sound and socially just. These mechanisms and their negotiations are discussed and the future of sustainability standards for agroecology assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackrill R, Kay A (2011) EU biofuels sustainability standards and certification systems: how to seek WTO-compatibility. J Agric Econ 62:551–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain C, Ransom E, Worosz M (2010) Constructing credibility: using technoscience to legitimate strategies in agrifood governance. J Rural Soc Sci 25:160–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Barham E (2002) Towards a theory of value-based labeling. Agric Hum Values 19:349–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos S, Dolan C (2006) Transformations of global food: opportunities and challenges for fair and ethical trade. In: Barrientos S, Dolan C (eds) Ethical sourcing in the global food system. Earthscan, London, pp 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley T (2010) Transnational private regulation in practice: the limits of forest and labor standards certification in Indonesia. Bus Polit 12(3), Article 7, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield M (1999) Ethical trade: a review of developments and issues. Third World Q 20(4):753–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski L, Thévenot L (2006) On justification – the economies of worth. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Boström M, Klintman M (2006) State-centered versus nonstate-driven organic food standardization: a comparison of the US and Sweden. Agric Hum Values 23:163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boström M, Klintman M (2011) Eco-standards, product labeling and green consumerism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher D (2011) Palm oil and tropical deforestation. Union of Concerned Scientists. http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/solutions/forest_solutions/palm-oil-and-forests.html#Palm%20oil%20and%20tropical%20deforestation. Accessed 26 July 2011

  • Brasher P (2010) Wal-Mart wants Iowans to farm by its principles. Des Moines Register, November 7, D1and D4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratt C, Hallstedt S, Robèrt KH, Broman G, Oldmark J (2011) Assessment of eco-labeling criteria development from a strategic sustainability perspective. J Clean Prod 19(14):1631–1638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretton Woods Project (2011) Open for business: World Bank to reinvest in palm oil amid criticism. http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/art-568287. Accessed 26 July 2011

  • Clayton KC, Preston WP (2003) The political economy of differentiating markets: facing reality inside the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Am J Agric Econ 85:737–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consumers Union (2011) Consumer Reports. Greener Choices Eco-labels Center. http://www.greenerchoices.org/eco-labels/eco-home.cfm?redirect=1. Accessed 26 Dec 2011

  • Daviron B, Vagneron I (2011) From commoditisation to de-commoditisation and back again: discussing the role of sustainability standards for agricultural products. Dev Policy Rev 29:91–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espach RH (2009) Private environmental regimes in developing countries: globally sown, locally grown. Palgrave MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner R (2003) Private environmental governance and international relations: exploring the links. Global Environ Polit 3:72–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forest Peoples Programme (2011) World Bank lifts suspension on financing palm oil. http://www.forestpeoples.org/topics/palm-oil-rspo/news/2011/04/world-bank-lifts-suspension-financing-palm-oil. Accessed 26 July 2011

  • Fox T, Vorley B (2006) Small producers: constraints and challenges in the global food system. In: Barrientos S, Dolan C (eds) Ethical sourcing in the global food system. Earthscan, London, pp 163–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidberg S (2004) The ethical complex of corporate food power: environment and Plan D. Soc Space 22:513–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs D, Kalfagianni A, Havinga T (2011) Actors in private food governance: the legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agr Hum Values 28:353–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulponi L (2006) Private voluntary standards in the food system: the perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries. Food Policy 31:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage D (2009) Wal-Mart to set sustainability standards. Information Week, July 16. http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218501046. Accessed June 2011

  • Galan MB, Peschard D, Boizard H (2007) ISO 14001 at the farm level: analysis of five methods for evaluating the environmental impact of agricultural practices. J Environ Manag 82:341–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G, Garcia-Johnson R, Sasser E (2001) The NGO-industrial complex. Foreign Policy, July/August, pp 56–65. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2001/07/01/the_ngo_industrial_complex?print=yes&hidecomments=yes&page=full. Accessed 26 Dec 2011

  • Giovannucci D, Koekoek KJ (2003) The state of sustainable coffee: a study of twelve major markets. International Coffee Organization and International Institute for Sustainable Development, London/Winnipeg

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannucci D, Ponte S (2005) Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry. Food Policy 30:284–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen P (2011) Mechanisms of private meta-governance: an analysis of global private governance for sustainable development. Int J Strateg Bus Alliances 2:189–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D (2003) The quality ‘turn’ and alternative food practices: reflections and agenda. J Rural Stud 19:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D, Dupuis EM (2002) Knowing food and growing food: beyond the production–consumption debate in the sociology of agriculture. Soc Ruralis 42:5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulbrandsen LH (2004) Overlapping public and private governance: can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime? Global Environ Polit 4:75–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M (1996) Ecological modernisation as cultural politics. In: Lash S, Szersxynski B, Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment, and modernity. Sage, London, pp 246–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka M, Busch L (2008) Third-party certification in the global agrifood system: an objective or socially mediated governance mechanism? Soc Ruralis 48:73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka M, Bain C, Busch L (2005) Third-party certification in the global agrifood system. Food Policy 30:354–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson S, Reardon T (2005) Private agri-food standards: implications for food policy and the agri-food system. Food Policy 30(3):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill LD (1990) Grain grades and standards: historical issues shaping the future. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (International Standards Organization) (2000) Environmental labels and declarations – general principles. ISO 14020:2000(E), International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2011) ISO 14000 Environmental management – ISO 14000 essentials. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_14000_essentials. Accessed 26 Dec 2011

  • Kaplinsky R (2006) Revisiting the revisited terms of trade: will China make a difference? World Dev 34:981–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein N (2009) No logo. Picador, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummer C (2010) The great grocery smackdown. The Atlantic, March. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/03/the-great-grocery-smackdown/7904/. Accessed 26 July 2011

  • Lewandowski I, Faaij A (2006) Steps towards the development of a certification system for sustainable bio-energy trade. Biomass Bioenerg 30:83–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton A (2005) Partnering for sustainability: business–NGO alliances in the coffee industry. Dev Pract 15:600–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little D (2003) The paradox of wealth and poverty. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning S, von Hagen O (2010) Linking local experiments to global standards: how project networks promote global institution-building. Scand J Manag 26:398–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning S, Boons F, von Hagen O, Reinecke J (2011) National contexts matter: the co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains. Ecol Econ. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800911003624

  • Markevičius A, Katinas V, Perednis E, Tamašauskienė M (2010) Trends and sustainability criteria of the production and use of liquid biofuels. Renew Sust Energy Rev 14:3226–3231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy M (2003) Organic certification in the United States and Europe. Washington tree fruit postharvest conference, Wenatchee, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael P (2009) The agrofuels project at large. Crit Sociol 35:825–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo CJ, Wolf SA (2005) Empirical assessment of eco-certification – the case of Ecuadorian bananas. Organ Environ 18:287–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol A (2001) Globalization and environmental reform: the ecological modernisation of the global economy. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol A (2010) Environmental authorities and biofuel controversies. Environ Polit 19:61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson J, Pritchard B (2009) Value chain struggles: institutions and governance in the plantation districts of South India. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadvi K, Wältring F (2004) Making sense of global standards. In: Schmitz H (ed) Local enterprises in the global economy: issues of governance and upgrading. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 53–94

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2010) Toward sustainable agricultural systems in the 21st century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke D (2005) Market movements. Nongovernmental organization strategies to influence global production and consumption. J Ind Ecol 9:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overdevest C (2009) Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Soc Econ Rev 8:47–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg P (2004) Private environmental governance and the sustainability transition: functions and impacts of NGO-business partnerships. In: Jacob K, Binder M, Wieczorek A (eds) Governance for industrial transformation. Environmental Policy Research Centre, Berlin, pp 52–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg PH (2005) The Forest Stewardship Council: risk and potential of private forest governance. J Environ Dev 14:356–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson R (2007) Beyond women workers: gendering CSR. Third World Q 28(4):731–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Rametsteiner E, Simula M (2003) Forest certification – an instrument to promote sustainable forest management? J Environ Manag 67:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds L (2000) Re-embedding global agriculture: the international organic and fair trade movements. Agric Hum Values 17:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds L (2002) Consumer/producer links in fair trade coffee networks. Sociol Ruralis 42:404–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon T, Berdegue J (2002) The rapid rise of supermarkets in Latin America: challenges and opportunities for development. Dev Policy Rev 20:371–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon T, Codron JM, Busch L, Bingen J, Harris C (2001) Global change in agrifood grades and standards: agribusiness strategic responses in developing countries. Int Food Agribus Manage Rev 2(3):421–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WI (2002) Remapping development in light of globalisation: from a territorial to a social cartography. Third World Q 23:1047–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupert M (2005) Reflections on some lessons learned from a decade of globalisation studies. New Polit Econ 10:457–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarlat N, Dallemand JF (2011) Recent development of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: a global overview. Energy Policy 39:1630–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten G, Glasbergen P (2011) Creating legitimacy in global private governance: the case of the roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Ecol Econ 70:1891–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva Castañeda L (2012) A forest of evidence: third-party certification and multiple forms of proof: a cast study on oil palm plantations in Indonesia. Agr Hum Values (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stupak I, Lattimore B, Titus BD, Tattersall Smith C (2011) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest fuel production and harvesting: a review of current standards for sustainable forest management. Biomass Bioenerg 35:3287–3308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Sustainability Consortium (2011) http://www.sustainabilityconsortium.org Accessed 26 July 2011

  • Thévenot L (2001) Organized complexity: conventions of coordination and the composition of economic arrangements. Eur J Soc Theory 4:405–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utting P (2005) Corporate responsibility and the movement of business. Dev Pract 15:375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dam J, Junginger M, Faaij A, Jürgens I, Best G, Fritsche U (2008) Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification. Biomass Bioenerg 32:749–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dam J, Junginger M, Faaij APC (2010) From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:2445–2472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbergh MP (2007) The new Wal-Mart effect: the role of private contracting in global governance. UCLA Law Rev 54:913

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall E, Weersink A, Swanton C (2001) Agriculture and ISO 14000. Food Policy 26:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmart Corporate (2011) Sustainability index. http://walmartstores.com/sustainability/9292.aspx Accessed 26 July 2011

  • Wezel A, Jauneau J-C (2011) Agroecology: interpretations, approaches and their links to nature conservation, rural development and ecotourism. In: Campbell WB, Lopez Ortiz S (eds) Issues in agroecology – present status and future prospectus, vol 1, Integrating agriculture, conservation, and ecotourism: examples from the field. Springer Science + Business Media, BV, Dordrecht, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank/International Finance Corporation (2011) World Bank Group framework and IFC strategy for engagement in the palm oil sector. http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/agriconsultation.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/Jan6_RevisedFramework/$FILE/FactSheet_Revised+WBG+Framework+and+IFC+Strategy_January+2011.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2011

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the intellectual support provided by Solutions from the Land (http://www.sfldialogue.net/) and the International Sociological Association Research Committee on Agriculture and Food.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelia Butler Flora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flora, C.B., Bain, C., Call, C. (2012). Sustainability Standards and Their Implications for Agroecology. In: Campbell, W., López Ortíz, S. (eds) Integrating Agriculture, Conservation and Ecotourism: Societal Influences. Issues in Agroecology – Present Status and Future Prospectus, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4485-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics