Abstract
The conflict between the sciences and the humanities results from an implicit endorsement by most scientists and humanists of representationalist theories of truth. I argue that a pragmatic account of truth, as modified by John Dewey’s notion of philosophical reconstruction, affords us the means of reaching rapprochement. I draw on the work of C. P. Snow, Jerome Kagan, and Edward Slingerland to develop a neurophilosophical pragmatist account of how to reconstruct the relationship between the two cultures. I draw on recent work on mirror neuron systems and suggest that a new metaphor for thinking about consciousness may serve well the reconstructive project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cozolino, L. (2006). The neuroscience of human relationships: Attachment and the developing social brain. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Dewey, J. 1910 (1988). How we think. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey (Vol. 6). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. 1920/1948 (1988). Reconstruction in philosophy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey (Vol. 12). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. 1925/1929 (1988). Experience and nature. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey (Vol. 1). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. 1929 (1988). The quest for certainty. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey (Vol. 4). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. 1938 (1988). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey (Vol. 12). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. 1948 (1988). Introduction: Reconstruction as seen Twenty-Five Years Later in reconstruction in philosophy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey (Vol. 12). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Franks, D. (2010). Neurosociology: The nexus between neuroscience and social psychology. New York: Springer.
Hickman, L. (2001). Philosophical tools for technological culture. In S. Rice (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2001. Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.
Hickman, L. (2007a). Some strange things they say about pragmatism: Robert Brandom on the pragmatists’ semantic ‘mistake’. Cognition, 8(1), 105–113.
Hickman, L. (2007b). Pragmatism as post-postmodernism: Lessons from John Dewey. New York: Fordham University Press.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Kagan, J. (2009). The three cultures: Natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in the 21st century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCumber, J. (2001). Time in the ditch: American philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Rockwell, W. T. (2005). Neither brain nor ghost: A nondualist alternative to mind-brain identity theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rockwell, W. T. (2011). Beyond eliminative materialism: Some unnoticed implications of Churchland’s pragmatic pluralism. Contemporary Pragmatism, 8(1), 173–190.
Schulkin, J. (2000). Roots of social sensibility and neural function. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Schulkin, J. (2004). Bodily sensibility: Intelligent action. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Schulkin, J. (2006). Effort: A behavioral neuroscience perspective on the will. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schulkin, J. (2009). Cognitive adaptation: A pragmatist perspective. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sellars, W. (1963). Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In W. Sellars (Ed.), Science, perception and reality (pp. 1–40). Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 1991.
Shook, J., & Solymosi, T. (2012). Neuropragmatism: A way forward. In J. Giordano (Ed.), Neuroscience, neurotechnology, and neuroethics. New York/Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slingerland, E. (2008). What science offers the humanities: Integrating body and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Snow, C. P. 1959 (1998). The two cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Solymosi, T. (2011a). Neuropragmatism, old and new. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(3), 347–368. (published online April 2011).
Solymosi, T. (2011b). A reconstruction of freedom in the age of neuroscience: A view from neuropragmatism. Contemporary Pragmatism, 8(1), 153–171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Solymoski, T. (2013). Can the Two Cultures Reconcile? Reconstruction and Neuropragmatism. In: Franks, D.D., Turner, J.H. (eds) Handbook of Neurosociology. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4472-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4473-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)